#Official Mining Thread

Developments in Regional South Australia. Including Port Lincoln, Victor Harbor, Wallaroo, Gawler and Mount Barker.
Message
Author
User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#631 Post by Wayno » Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:46 pm

Now is not the time to annoy mining companies

I typically like the Greens, and agree 3.5% for mining royalties is a bit slim, but the timing of this proposal is woeful. Get the open-cut ODX up and running, then increase the royalty rate.

4 days til the ODX EIS is released!

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009 ... n=business
Greens MP Mark Parnell says BHP Billiton should be paying higher royalties for its Olympic Dam mine in outback South Australia.

Mr Parnell says South Australia is earning a 3.5 per cent royalty from the mine, but a rate of 10 per cent is paid in Queensland, for example.

He says the SA rate should be doubled and the money put into a future fund, especially as the company plans to expand the gold, copper and uranium mine.

"Now with this proposed Olympic Dam expansion it's a non renewable resource, we need to make sure that the South Australian community gets a decent return for this investment if in fact it is to go ahead," he said.

"The best time for us as a community to negotiate with BHP Billiton is before the approvals have been granted.

"Once they've been given approval to expand their mine it'll be too late to then turn around and say 'By the way, can we have higher royalties?'"
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3650
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#632 Post by SRW » Mon Apr 27, 2009 9:50 pm

Wayno wrote: I typically like the Greens, and agree 3.5% for mining royalties is a bit slim, but the timing of this proposal is woeful. Get the open-cut ODX up and running, then increase the royalty rate.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009 ... n=business
"Once they've been given approval to expand their mine it'll be too late to then turn around and say 'By the way, can we have higher royalties?'"
Perhaps that's why? I haven't the time to look up the relevant information, but does anyone know off the top of their head if royalty rates can be changed post-approval?
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#633 Post by Wayno » Tue Apr 28, 2009 7:52 am

SRW wrote:
"Once they've been given approval to expand their mine it'll be too late to then turn around and say 'By the way, can we have higher royalties?'"
Perhaps that's why? I haven't the time to look up the relevant information, but does anyone know off the top of their head if royalty rates can be changed post-approval?
could be, but it's just another govt tax - which as we know can typically change at any time...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Howie
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4874
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#634 Post by Howie » Fri May 01, 2009 8:06 am


Olympic Dam ready for public comment

Article from: The Advertiser

CHRIS RUSSELL

May 01, 2009 12:01am

THE public will be able to comment on the South Australian economy's biggest project, the expansion of the Olympic Dam mine, from today.

BHP Billiton will release its long-awaited environmental and economic impact statement on the multi-billion dollar project at 3pm.

The statement is the company's blueprint on how it intends to proceed with expanding the copper, uranium and gold mine at Roxby Downs and how this will transform the state.

At more than 4000 pages, Olympic Dam Expansion: Draft Environmental Impact Statement 2009 is the biggest EIS ever undertaken.

READ THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FIRST ON ADELAIDENOW.COM.AU

Public comment will be invited by the Urban Development and Planning Department from today until August 7 – a longer consultation period than normal.

Public forums with government and BHP Billiton representatives will be held in Adelaide, Whyalla, Port Augusta, Roxby Downs, Alice Springs and Darwin from May 25 to June 5.

Copies of the EIS can be purchased from the planning department and selected local council offices at $50 for the two-volume statement and $300 for the two volumes plus a full set of appendices.

BHP Billiton will donate proceeds to charity.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#635 Post by Wayno » Fri May 01, 2009 8:56 am

Be ready for the onslaught of Environmentalists voicing their concerns about the ODX expansion :roll:

ODX is simply a big hole in the ground, and far far away from any water supplies to worry about ground discharge. I'm sure "dangerous radioactive material" stories will be front page of the Advertiser for a few weeks too...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#636 Post by Prince George » Fri May 01, 2009 11:34 am

Howie wrote:
READ THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FIRST ON ADELAIDENOW.COM.AU
Oh, please tell me that there's a comment forum on AdelaideNow for this EIS, that's where the real debate will be :)

User avatar
Howie
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4874
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#637 Post by Howie » Fri May 01, 2009 11:37 am

How about we beat them to it by posting it first :D

UrbanSG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 1848
Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2005 8:55 am

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#638 Post by UrbanSG » Fri May 01, 2009 3:31 pm

It's HUGE..... there's too much to post :D

http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/odxEis/do ... uments.jsp

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#639 Post by Wayno » Fri May 01, 2009 4:23 pm

UrbanSG wrote:It's HUGE..... there's too much to post :D

http://www.bhpbilliton.com/bb/odxEis/do ... uments.jsp
damn! even the exec summary is 60pages - well there goes my weekend...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#640 Post by Wayno » Fri May 01, 2009 4:53 pm

ODX Factoid - World Demand

I'm going to drip feed interesting factoids from the ODX EIS as i read it.

World demand for copper and uranium are 2 key reasons why the ODX expansion will most likely start in 2010 soon after all approvals are gained:
  • * Copper - 35 additional mines the size of ODX are required to meet world copper demand by 2018 (ODX will be the 4th largest copper mine in the world)
    * Uranium - 13 additional mines the size of ODX are required to meet world uranium demand by 2030 (ODX will be the worlds largest uranium mine by a factor of 4)
Wowza!
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#641 Post by Wayno » Fri May 01, 2009 5:59 pm

ODX Factoid - $7b Economic Contribution to SA

An expanded ODX operation will increase SA's economic performance by 9%. It's contribution to the State Economy (aka GSP - Gross State Product) will increase from $1.7b to $7b annually (based on cost of living today).
odx-gsp.JPG
odx-gsp.JPG (54.3 KiB) Viewed 2117 times
This annual $7b figure is interesting. Only $0.25b comes direct from the mine (royalties and employees paying their income taxes). The remainder of the benefit is therefore from direct and indirect associated industries (e.g. local SA companies provide BHP with equipment, employees spending their income, creates jobs for real-estate agents/cafes/butchers/bakers/candle makers/etc, who in turn buy/sell/consume...)
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#642 Post by Wayno » Fri May 01, 2009 9:30 pm

ODX Factoid - Radiation Levels

I suspect the alarmists will soon run this one up the flagpole. Watch AdelaideNow salute the fastest! :lol:

International radiation guidelines require exposure to no more than 20mSv (millisieverts) of radiation per annum. BHP states that front-line ODX employees will receive less than 3.5mSV per year (1/6th of the international guideline). Keep this fact is your back pocket should you encounter any uranium alarmists!

Some more facts about uranium.
* If you lived for 80years and only ever used nuclear powered electricity then the waste produced (needing to be buried/stored from your personal consumption) would be about the size of a bottlecap.

* The per annum nuclear waste from Australia (if we were 100% fueled by nuclear reactors) would be about the size of a car, and that includes the thick-thick-thick walls of a protective enclosure. Now, think about the size of your local car wrecking yard - that would be the equivalent of several hundred years of nuclear operation here in australia...

* Only about 3% of the "nuclear energy" in a fuel rod is actually consumed in a reactor. Scare-mongers will say this means 97% of the radiation remains and needs to be worried about forever. In fact, the highly dangerous portion of each rod is consumed in that 3%. Any volatilily remaining in each rod has a half-life of a few weeks only, so by the time it's buried we are talking very low low radiation levels. Harldy worth panicking about. Again the concern is mostly about the media selling newspapers...

CO2 Sequestration - As a comparison
As a comparison, the Fed Govt is trying (cough - ahem, failing) to sell the concept that they can save the planet by continuing to mine coal en-masse and pump billions of litres of gas waaay underground - and magically keep it there forever! :lol: yeah, right - like gas won't leak out somewhere/somehow. I'll run nude down Rundle Mall at midday on a saturday if this technology ever works! and yes - not a pretty sight...

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#643 Post by monotonehell » Fri May 01, 2009 11:48 pm

Wayno wrote:...CO2 Sequestration - As a comparison
As a comparison, the Fed Govt is trying (cough - ahem, failing) to sell the concept that they can save the planet by continuing to mine coal en-masse and pump billions of litres of gas waaay underground - and magically keep it there forever! :lol: yeah, right - like gas won't leak out somewhere/somehow. I'll run nude down Rundle Mall at midday on a saturday if this technology ever works! and yes - not a pretty sight...
Sequestration is the biggest load of hooey ever. The amount of energy it would take to get the CO2 back to where it can be sequestered alone would take a huge chunk from the energy made burning the coal.

We really need to look elsewhere. There's loads of solar related and geothermal energy flipping about the country. That would augment a nuclear power industry reasonably well. We don't need to put all our eggs in one basket, as is said.

Solar thermal collector powered desalination plants anyone?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#644 Post by Wayno » Sat May 02, 2009 11:52 am

ODX Factoid - Environmental Concerns

Apparently the EIS is about the environment, so here's some snippets:

The big issues
  • * Desalination - i'm expecting an ongoing stink about this. A large-ish desal plant in the upper regions of the gulf, and near a bunch of cuttlefish. No desal = no mine!!
    * Electricity usage & CO2 emissions - ODX already uses 10% of SA's baseload energy, this will increase to 50% over time. Expect BHP to be under intense pressure to use environmentally friendly sources for their electricity (wind, thermal, wave, etc). Counter-intuitively, this could really push SA to the forefront in carbon-free electricity generation
Smaller issues
  • * Dirt & Dust - ODX will need special measures to avoid dust storms pushing into NSW & Victoria. The solution will mainly involve the use of water (not sure if it needs to be desalinated water for this purpose?)
    * Radiation - see my post above, not a big deal...
    * Native Flora & Fauna - again not a big deal, but they need to tick this box
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3090
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: #Official Mining Thread

#645 Post by rhino » Mon May 04, 2009 7:26 am

Wayno,

Thankyou for the drip feed. Most of us don't have the time to read the EIS, so your efforts are appreciated.

Big thumbs up!
cheers,
Rhino

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests