Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Pat28
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 4:42 pm

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#91 Post by Pat28 » Sun Jul 27, 2008 1:22 pm

If Buckland Park is Planned PROPERLY, not like the winding rambschackle hotschpotsch of Golden Grove, or Davoren Park with linear roads so a looping a bus service and links would work PROPERLY getting the most out of the buses at the same time whilst encouraging people to use the service.
So how does one plan for a new boganville?
Besser Verkehr in den Bergen

User avatar
Wilfy 2007
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:54 pm

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#92 Post by Wilfy 2007 » Sun Jul 27, 2008 3:07 pm

Pat28 wrote:If Buckland Park is Planned PROPERLY, not like the winding rambschackle hotschpotsch of Golden Grove, or Davoren Park with linear roads so a looping a bus service and links would work PROPERLY getting the most out of the buses at the same time whilst encouraging people to use the service.
So how does one plan for a new boganville?
Pat28,

Been looking at the maps of this development and it is quite feasible to run a Branch Railway line off the SG line at Gawler River Road, following Port Gawler Road and Horseshoe Court, then in a quarter circle into the Town centre of the Development.
Only real problems I can see is that a bridge over Port Wakefield road will need to be built and a bridge over Gawler River where it goes into the Town Centre.

It's certainly doable, just gotta have the money spent on it.

Regards,

Somebody
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 6:06 pm
Location: Australia (East Coast)

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#93 Post by Somebody » Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:54 pm

Some train running along a freight line to Adelaide every couple of hours would not be a solution to the area's transport needs.
The Gold Coast - Australia's centre for insipid, tacky & boring.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#94 Post by monotonehell » Sun Jul 27, 2008 5:57 pm

Somebody wrote:Some train running along a freight line to Adelaide every couple of hours would not be a solution to the area's transport needs.
Yeah but it would link to the Gawler - Elizabeth - Salisbury part of the line which would be the likely areas where most residents would work.

BUT I think by the looks of it this development is going to be very car oriented. :(
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Wilfy 2007
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:54 pm

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#95 Post by Wilfy 2007 » Sun Jul 27, 2008 8:27 pm

Think outside of the square people.
It is doable.
You just need to think about it.

Regards,

Somebody
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 6:06 pm
Location: Australia (East Coast)

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#96 Post by Somebody » Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:13 pm

What?
The Gold Coast - Australia's centre for insipid, tacky & boring.

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#97 Post by AtD » Sun Jul 27, 2008 9:47 pm

Physically possible? Sure. Economic feasible… uh…

P.K.
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#98 Post by P.K. » Thu Jul 31, 2008 8:59 pm

Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:The more I read on climate change the more I am convinced that we are now looking at the more the extreme of predicted impacts including rise in sea level. I am wondering at what point government or for that matter insurer’s step in to stop coastal and low lying projects. Or will my kids be paying for huge levy banks in 30 or 40 years.
It won’t be long and we are calling this Buckland lakes!
You do realise that the height above sea level for this area is the same as Port Adelaide, Semaphore, Glenelg, the adelaide airport etc etc...

Jim
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 241
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 7:46 pm
Location: North Adelaide

Re: #Proposed: Buckland Park Development

#99 Post by Jim » Thu Jul 31, 2008 9:20 pm

P.K. wrote:
Jim wrote:
Jim wrote:The more I read on climate change the more I am convinced that we are now looking at the more the extreme of predicted impacts including rise in sea level. I am wondering at what point government or for that matter insurer’s step in to stop coastal and low lying projects. Or will my kids be paying for huge levy banks in 30 or 40 years.
It won’t be long and we are calling this Buckland lakes!
You do realise that the height above sea level for this area is the same as Port Adelaide, Semaphore, Glenelg, the adelaide airport etc etc...
Yes, and the port already floods on king tides, the Pat's a mess at Glenelg

User avatar
Wilfy 2007
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:54 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#100 Post by Wilfy 2007 » Fri Dec 19, 2008 6:14 pm

Gidday,

Has there been any progress with this development?

Been a while since I saw any info about it.

Regards,

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#101 Post by Prince George » Sun Feb 01, 2009 1:38 am

Was this project canned? The Planning SA site has this terse single line on the list of previous major project applications:
Buckland Park Rural Land Division | 440 rural living allotments | Refused | Vosporos Pty Ltd
EDIT - actually, that must have been an older proposal by the same people, the current one is still awaiting assessment and hasn't produced its environment impact statement for public comment yet.

stanley
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:24 am

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#102 Post by stanley » Fri Apr 03, 2009 2:12 am

looks like in a months time we will know for sure if the development will go ahead..

Brando
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 773
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:11 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#103 Post by Brando » Tue May 05, 2009 5:42 pm

Greens blast Bucklands Park

May 04, 2009 09:45pm

THE GREENS want the State Government to reject the $2 billion Buckland Park development describing it as a "massive ghetto".

The Walker Corporation proposes to build 12,000 housing blocks over 25 years in the satellite city near Virginia.

Greens MLC Mark Parnell says the nearest services, including hospitals and employment opportunities were more than 20km away, with most residents expected to commute long distances to work.

"I cannot think of a worse housing plan – sticking tens of thousands of people outside the urban growth boundary, on a flood plain, next to a smelly composting facility in a heavily car-dependent commuter suburb," he said.

"The Buckland Park project is a massive ghetto in waiting as people attracted by relatively cheap land are marooned by high petrol prices."
http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/stor ... 01,00.html

If the Delfin plan goes ahead on the salt plains, i seriously doubt this proposal will..

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4581
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#104 Post by AtD » Tue May 05, 2009 5:45 pm

I agree with the Greens. This will be a car dependant bedroom community at best, and a ghetto at worse.

User avatar
Wilfy 2007
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:54 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#105 Post by Wilfy 2007 » Tue May 05, 2009 6:00 pm

AtD wrote:I agree with the Greens. This will be a car dependant bedroom community at best, and a ghetto at worse.
AtD,

It will only be car dependant if the SA Government do not build a branch line off the SG line which goes north to Crystal Brook.
A U shape connection could be made into the northern end of the Proposed Buckland Park Town centre in my opinion.

Regards,

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests