
i enjoyed seeing the progression of the site over the years! thanks!
It is not just tall buildings that helps with the look, we need more people to be around the city, meaning more residential apartments in the city so people will live in the city and be around the city at all times. That to me, is what a developed city is than just tall buildings.Benski81 wrote:Why not join the fanfare. I think this is a great building too and I don't think it's a typical apartment building at all.
I like what they've done with it. It's probably my favourite of the recent development so kudos to the developers.![]()
Developments like these are bulking up the skyline, now we just need a couple more taller buildings to give Adelaide that real developed city look.
Yeah totally agreed, I was more thinking when looking at the city from a distance. I saw a photo of Adelaide that was taken from a distance (I think it was earlier back in this thread) and the lack height was quite noticable.Edgar wrote:It is not just tall buildings that helps with the look, we need more people to be around the city, meaning more residential apartments in the city so people will live in the city and be around the city at all times. That to me, is what a developed city is than just tall buildings.Benski81 wrote:Why not join the fanfare. I think this is a great building too and I don't think it's a typical apartment building at all.
I like what they've done with it. It's probably my favourite of the recent development so kudos to the developers.![]()
Developments like these are bulking up the skyline, now we just need a couple more taller buildings to give Adelaide that real developed city look.
But I also welcome more modern buildings in the city.
Yes I do mean the facade, but not just that. I think that the office section seems eerily like another clone of city centre, and if the residential section was chopped off and flown over to Glenelg or Newport Quays it would hardly look out of place at all; from that point of view it seems very typical. And beyond that, it's typical in some more subtle ways. I don't mean this as an attack on the designers & builders: obviously they do take a lot of responsibility for how the building turns out, but everyone on this site knows that council, governments, the "market", and the wider public all have a part to play in what ultimately gets built in Adelaide.jk1237 wrote:in what sense do you mean typical Prince George? Im assuming you mean the outside facade
General Manager Omi would like his new city apartment building to be free of uncultured riff-raff, thank you. One does not live amongst the hired help.Prince George wrote:
And is there any "affordable" housing as part of this "major project"? Not as far as I can tell, it seems to just be 50-ish very expensive apartments so a hundred-odd people with six-figure salaries can walk to their offices (and still have parking for a couple of cars, but that's another story). Why did we need a major project to give a bunch of lawyers, dentists, and GMs some ritzy digs?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], PD2/20 and 4 guests