Aidan wrote:The term bogan refers to a specific cultural group. I could refer to them as feral Australians instead, but I thought it would make sense to use the term more commonly used.
'Bogan' is not a neutral term. Even the Macquarie regards it as "mildly derogatory", as it does 'feral'. In fact, I can only think of one time that I have ever heard 'feral' applied to people in anything other than a negative sense.
This gets back to what I was saying before about needing "others" where the problems lie. Behind a statement like "how can we prevent bogan suburbs from becoming violent", as opposed to a choice like "how can we curb violence", is the suggestion that the problem is the bogans themselves, barely controlling their simmering violent tendencies, hence Shuz hoping they move to Sydney (I only hope in jest). There's an element of smugness to this thinking, and complacency, once the problem group gets named it almost absolves us of responsibility. "Oh, if only we could get rid of those bogans (or Nimby's, tree-huggers, red-necks, dole-bludgers, Abos, fat-cats, gays, evangelicals, wogs, the yellow peril, bureaucrats, single mothers, deadbeat dads, lazy unions, greedy bosses, bike-nazis, cars), we wouldn't have this problem". The sad fact is that there is practically no problem in our society that does not implicate me in some way, but "naming the problem" often means that I just delay or avoid accepting that.
Language is the house of the mind, it deserves more care and attention than many people commonly give it.