This story shows the difference in heritage attitudes in the city of Melbourne, at least of those who are approving constructions...
http://www.theage.com.au/national/stork ... -gb3p.html
This 67 story building will be on the site of a to-be-demolished 150 year old pub which isn't considered to be of heritage importance because of alterations carried out in 1925
New Melbourne skyscraper to replace historic pub
-
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 7:16 pm
Re: New Melbourne skyscraper to replace historic pub
Looks like one of the blandest buildings I've ever seen.
Re: New Melbourne skyscraper to replace historic pub
the qantas building looks just as bad as the one on north tce :p
Re: New Melbourne skyscraper to replace historic pub
Both extremes of opinion are bad.Hindley Street Alley wrote:This story shows the difference in heritage attitudes in the city of Melbourne, at least of those who are approving constructions...
http://www.theage.com.au/national/stork ... -gb3p.html
This 67 story building will be on the site of a to-be-demolished 150 year old pub which isn't considered to be of heritage importance because of alterations carried out in 1925
Here in Adelaide we are at the other extreme.
The best way forward is to protect our heritage whilst at the same time not going down the 'character' path.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests