COM: [Glenelg] Bay Junction Shopping Centre | $60m
- Xaragmata
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
- Location: Adelaide / West
- Contact:
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
Memory of what was:
What is now, from Monday:
What is now, from Monday:
- Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3832
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
- Contact:
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
That Bayside Village signage is appallingly bad.
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
I hope they are going to paint that bare concrete. It looks shite!
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
i drove past the rear of this (Augusta St - one block back running parallel to Jetty Rd) and it looks appalling. The ramp up to the 2nd level car parking is almost a corkscrew, and the stairs on the corner of Augusta/Rose st look like they were designed by children the way they conspicuously jutt out.
A *meh* rating for the whole thing...
A *meh* rating for the whole thing...
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
lol who the heck came up with the idea to squash the trees?
looks embarassing
that picture needs to be captioned with "epic fail"
looks embarassing
that picture needs to be captioned with "epic fail"
- baytram366
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 469
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 4:06 pm
- Contact:
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
The trees are not actually that funny if you think about it.
The reason why they like are that is becuase the Council has deemed these trees significant and refused the developers permission to cut them down. So instead of kicking up a big legal fight with the council, the builders simply built around the trees and are just hoping and waiting for them to die so they then become a hazard and have to be removed.
This makes me quite angry actually...
The reason why they like are that is becuase the Council has deemed these trees significant and refused the developers permission to cut them down. So instead of kicking up a big legal fight with the council, the builders simply built around the trees and are just hoping and waiting for them to die so they then become a hazard and have to be removed.
This makes me quite angry actually...
Baytram 366's Flickr:
www.flickr.com/photos/baytram366
www.flickr.com/photos/baytram366
- Queen Anne
- Donating Member
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 3:32 pm
- Location: Adelaide
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
Wow, if that's true, I'm disgusted! It would be enough to stop me shopping there.baytram366 wrote:The trees are not actually that funny if you think about it.
The reason why they like are that is becuase the Council has deemed these trees significant and refused the developers permission to cut them down. So instead of kicking up a big legal fight with the council, the builders simply built around the trees and are just hoping and waiting for them to die so they then become a hazard and have to be removed.
This makes me quite angry actually...
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
I work in here, and I have to say honestly. It's not the best thing since sliced bread. Another copy-pasta of shopping centre clones elsewhere.
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
How about some pics crawf ?
The photos I've seen of it don't look too good.
The photos I've seen of it don't look too good.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:13 pm
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
I await the council's motion to have the concrete cut away to prevent damage to these trees. At the developer's expense of course.baytram366 wrote:The trees are not actually that funny if you think about it.
The reason why they like are that is becuase the Council has deemed these trees significant and refused the developers permission to cut them down. So instead of kicking up a big legal fight with the council, the builders simply built around the trees and are just hoping and waiting for them to die so they then become a hazard and have to be removed.
This makes me quite angry actually...
AdelaideNow: Now with 300% more Liberal Party hacks, at no extra cost.
-
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 10:58 pm
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
Perhaps so, but the last one really, really, really needed to be replaced... it was falling apart. I'm gonna put this in the 'pass - but missed opportunity' category. If only the original plans for apartments on top were approved.Shuz wrote:I work in here, and I have to say honestly. It's not the best thing since sliced bread. Another copy-pasta of shopping centre clones elsewhere.
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
ghs wrote:How about some pics crawf ?
The photos I've seen of it don't look too good.
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
sorry crawf that entry was meant to go in the swimming centre thread
I was meaning can you put up some pics of the darwin wave pool ?
I was meaning can you put up some pics of the darwin wave pool ?
Re: #U/C: | Bay Junction | $60m | 3lvls | Retail | Glenelg
Well, the Bayside Village appears to be no Burnside Village...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: A-Town and 4 guests