Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#136 Post by drsmith » Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:58 pm

The blocks adjacent to the salt pans could potentially be advertised as sea front property.

fabricator
Legendary Member!
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:13 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#137 Post by fabricator » Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:03 pm

drsmith wrote:The blocks adjacent to the salt pans could potentially be advertised as sea front property.
Yes, and the ones right on Port Wakefield Road can be advertised as 'close to transport'.

Anyone else suspect this could be a suburb for truck drivers ?
AdelaideNow: Now with 300% more Liberal Party hacks, at no extra cost.

User avatar
bm7500
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#138 Post by bm7500 » Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:34 am

AG wrote:Just to give those an idea of where the Buckland Park development is proposed to take place relative to the existing urban areas and planned infrastructure, here is a map from the Department of Planning and Local Government:
http://www.planning.sa.gov.au/images/dm ... iteMap.jpg
Thanks for the map, it gives a good indication as to where the site actually is. And yes there is definately a need to incorporate a future rail line/spur into this development, otherwise Port Wakefield Road is going to become a nightmare!
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#139 Post by drsmith » Sun Aug 09, 2009 12:02 pm

And a grade seperated interchange with Angle Vale Road for access to the development from Port Wakefield Road ?

Port Wakefield Road itself could be upgraded to 6 lanes from the Northern Connector to Angle Vale Road. A rail spur would require additional bridge work to access the development however a suburban service from Virginia (or a station near Angle Vale Road on that line) would not.

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#140 Post by monotonehell » Sun Aug 09, 2009 5:36 pm

drsmith wrote:And a grade seperated interchange with Angle Vale Road for access to the development from Port Wakefield Road ?

Port Wakefield Road itself could be upgraded to 6 lanes from the Northern Connector to Angle Vale Road. A rail spur would require additional bridge work to access the development however a suburban service from Virginia (or a station near Angle Vale Road on that line) would not.
Why we're even entertaining this ludicrous idea of a pocket development at least 12Km from any kind of support services, let alone a rail spur to the middle of nowhere solely to support this outlanders' ghetto, I just don't understand. It flies in the face of the Govt's 30 year plan, it flies in the face of everything we know about urban sprawl, and it flies in the face of common sense.

Look at a damn map people.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#141 Post by drsmith » Sun Aug 09, 2009 7:54 pm

Actually a railway spur could run east of Port Wakefield Road to the Port Wakefield Road/Angle Vale Road intersection. The most significant road the spur would cross would be Old Port Wakefield Road south of Virginia so a level crossing would suffice.

As for the name ditch Buckland Park and call it Salt Pan City.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#142 Post by Omicron » Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:21 am

AG wrote:Just to give those an idea of where the Buckland Park development is proposed to take place relative to the existing urban areas and planned infrastructure, here is a map from the Department of Planning and Local Government:
http://www.planning.sa.gov.au/images/dm ... iteMap.jpg
Wow. That doesn't help its case at all. What a wretched, distant, ill-considered place.

P.K.
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#143 Post by P.K. » Sat Aug 15, 2009 11:05 am

Omicron wrote:
AG wrote:Just to give those an idea of where the Buckland Park development is proposed to take place relative to the existing urban areas and planned infrastructure, here is a map from the Department of Planning and Local Government:
http://www.planning.sa.gov.au/images/dm ... iteMap.jpg
Wow. That doesn't help its case at all. What a wretched, distant, ill-considered place.
OMG is that map true, is it really that far out from gepps cross! wow lucky theres accomodation at bolivar so we can stay overnight when we drive out there!!! i wonder if the road is sealed that far north of adelaide! is it still in SA or that on the NT border!

fabricator
Legendary Member!
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:13 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#144 Post by fabricator » Sat Aug 15, 2009 5:29 pm

P.K. wrote:
Omicron wrote:
AG wrote:Just to give those an idea of where the Buckland Park development is proposed to take place relative to the existing urban areas and planned infrastructure, here is a map from the Department of Planning and Local Government:
http://www.planning.sa.gov.au/images/dm ... iteMap.jpg
Wow. That doesn't help its case at all. What a wretched, distant, ill-considered place.
OMG is that map true, is it really that far out from gepps cross! wow lucky theres accomodation at bolivar so we can stay overnight when we drive out there!!! i wonder if the road is sealed that far north of adelaide! is it still in SA or that on the NT border!
How is the weather there in Burnside ?
Pesky wind still blowing oak leaves onto your BMW, tall trees still interfering with reception of Channel Ten ?

Lets be honest, Buckland Park is too far from the built up area to be considered a suburb, but its not exactly a prime beach side suburb either. It basically a country town, without the town part.
AdelaideNow: Now with 300% more Liberal Party hacks, at no extra cost.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#145 Post by Omicron » Mon Aug 17, 2009 10:48 pm

God forbid people east of town pass judgement on anything north of them, or northerners comment on Glenelg developments, or metropolitan Adelaide residents vote in ACC elections.....

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#146 Post by Shuz » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:17 pm

SA Government approves new suburb at Buckland Park
Sarah Martin From: AdelaideNow February 04, 2010 11:08am

A $2 BILLION satellite city for Adelaide's north has been approved by the State Government.

Walker Corporation's Buckland Park development will take 25 years to complete and aims to house up to 33,000 people.

Walker Corporation's billionaire head, Lang Walker, is in Adelaide for the announcement by Planning Minister Paul Holloway this morning.

The first stage of the development will incorporate 600 residential allotments and a neighbourhood centre and is expected to be completed by 2014.

Mr Walker said he expected the project to create 2200 jobs a year in the construction sector.

``In addition to jobs created to construct the new community, by 2036 we also expect around 10,000 people will be employed in jobs at employment and centre precincts within Buckland Park, with the potential for a further 15,000 jobs to be indirectly generated within the economy,'' he said.

Minister Holloway said the approval had been granted with strict environmental conditions, including the retention of native vegetation along Gawler River.
Shouldn't this be in the Metropolitan Development thread? As it technically lies within the Adelaide Urban Growth Boundary.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#147 Post by Waewick » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:49 pm

I'd question if it should even exist (IRL) :D

i'm trying to get through the government website to understand the development a bit better. It seems like we are going to have 33k people stuck out in the middle on know where?

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2539
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#148 Post by Shuz » Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:08 pm

Well, I think it's fair to say they (the Government) wouldn't approve a "satellite city" of this size, without adequate PT or even freeway links, unless the they knew that Federal funding would be promised to fund the $2.2b Northern Connector proposal. There's too much risk doing so otherwise.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#149 Post by AG » Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:18 pm

Lang Walker was in Adelaide about a couple of weeks ago as well to open up a facility in the Vicinity industrial estate not too far south from Buckland Park which is also being developed by the Walker Corporation so nearby employment opportunities shouldn't be too bad for Buckland Park. However, nothing much about public transport and new infrastructure to the new area seems to have been addressed except for schools (or made public).

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#150 Post by Waewick » Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:38 pm

these types of developments should have at minimum and extension of the train line into them.

but we are in SA so I expect a minor road to be turned into a major road without substaintal development.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest