COM: [Walkerville] DTEI Building > Hotel | 11lvls | $106m

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

COM: [Walkerville] DTEI Building > Hotel | 11lvls | $106m

#1 Post by AtD » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:32 am

Today's AFR reports the former DTEI building in Walkerville has been sold and will be converted to apartments. The 1960s 9 level office building has 18,000sqm of space and sits on a 1.2 hectare site. It sold for $10m

User avatar
jk1237
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 1756
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 11:22 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#2 Post by jk1237 » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:40 am

Great news. Although its only 9 levels, its a pretty large building. Anyone knows how it compares in size to the former ETSA (now air) building on Greenhill Rd.
Pretty smart move buying this. On the banks of Linear Park, beautiful old suburb of Walkerville, near city, developer would prob make a tidy profit on this one

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#3 Post by AG » Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:45 am

Not only does the site contain a large building, but it also contains a reasonably sized car park space on its south side, and there's another car park on the opposite side of river that connects to St Peters that was created to serve the building as well. I wonder if this has been included in the contract as well. The car park to the south could be redesigned for more efficient use to the developer's benefit. There's also the new shopping centre that hasn't made much progress "under construction" directly to its north. I'm not sure of the size of the building compared to AIR, but the site area is a fair bit larger.

(I can see this building from my place and walk past it often)

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#4 Post by AtD » Thu Feb 04, 2010 11:46 am

Does anyone have any current photos of the site to add to this thread?

how_good_is_he
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:32 pm

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#5 Post by how_good_is_he » Thu Feb 04, 2010 1:22 pm

Any idea who bought it?

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#6 Post by AtD » Thu Feb 04, 2010 8:57 pm

No, sorry. The article didn't mention.

User avatar
Splashmo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#7 Post by Splashmo » Thu Feb 04, 2010 10:30 pm

Awesome location and great views of the city and the hills - hopefully the re-design of the building will match.

User avatar
Xaragmata
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1613
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
Location: Adelaide / West
Contact:

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#8 Post by Xaragmata » Fri Feb 05, 2010 12:22 pm

AtD wrote:Does anyone have any current photos of the site to add to this thread?
Yesterday, with Walkerville Village site:

Image


Image


Image


Image

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#9 Post by AtD » Fri Feb 05, 2010 7:59 pm

Thanking you kindly.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#10 Post by rhino » Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:33 pm

Would that building be considered Brutalist?
cheers,
Rhino

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5864
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#11 Post by Will » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:06 pm

rhino wrote:Would that building be considered Brutalist?
Even though I dont like the architecture of the building, it is nevertheless significant.

The Building is regarded as the first brutalist high-rise building in Australia. In fact, it was designed at a time when the term 'brutalist' had not even been invented yet. The building is so significant to the history of high rise building of Australia, that an entire chapter is devoted to it, in the respected book "Tall Buildings: Australian Business Going Up: 1945-1970".

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#12 Post by rhino » Tue Feb 09, 2010 3:25 pm

Thanks Will
cheers,
Rhino

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#13 Post by Omicron » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:42 pm

The fundamental problem with Brutalist buildings is that they are at their most desirable when they exist in their original state, right down to the original fixtures and fittings. I had always thought of the Boston City Hall (1969), for example, as a dreadful ugly thing, but when viewed in its original configuration with plush '70s carpeting, thick wood panelling and ornate fixtures to balance out the harshness of the exposed concrete and sharp lines, it seems to work far better as a whole than its underwhelming half-hearted form of recent times. It's just not an architectural style that lends itself well to modern upgrades or enhancements - you can, for example, add ultra-modern renovations to an Edwardian-era building and have it all work fabulously well, or to use a more local example, add a vast glass entrance to the State Library and do nothing but enhance the quality of the nearby historic wings, but a successful modern extension to a Brutalist building is few and far between.

It's also true, too, that many buildings branded as 'Brutalist' or similar don't quite display the very best elements of the style - the soaring ceilings; the imposing voids; the dramatic use of idle space to convey power and strength. Many simply applied the harsh concrete exteriors to basic square office buldings to create nothing more than hefty Stonehenge edifices sitting like obstinate blocks in the middle of cities. A real shame, too, that concrete back then just didn't have the necessary treatments to withstand much at all - now we see smoke stains, water stains or crumbling from surfaces that were once deliciously smooth and, well, impressively brutal.

A further problem is that the dated ostentatiousness of many interiors designed to complement Brutalist buildings is simply not desirable in the eyes of the vast majority of people. The minimalism of the International style is enjoying a resurgence (think green-tinted glass, acres of polished marble and terazzo, sharp lines, stainless steel and so on), but the combination of buttoned leather, plush velvet and exposed concrete just doesn't appeal to the masses these days.

The fact remains, of course, that far too many Brutalist buildings had an atrocious relationship with their surroundings, and as much as anything, that's part of the problem - in their original form they are the most appealing to look at and spend time in, but they are also the most dated, uninviting and confusing.

User avatar
fishinajar
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 276
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 12:23 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#14 Post by fishinajar » Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:18 pm

Omicron wrote:The fundamental problem with Brutalist buildings ...
An interesting read Omicron.

stumpjumper
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm

Re: PRO: Walkerville DTEI building convert to Apartments | 9lvl

#15 Post by stumpjumper » Thu Mar 11, 2010 5:40 am

Good points, Omnicron. However, I suggest that in this case the pressure in the market for well-situated housing - which units in this building certainly would be - will overcome any aesthetic objections to the Brutalist style. In fact, as long as they don't paint the concrete exterior, the maintenance portion of the strata fees will be kept to a minimum!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests