Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
Straze
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:50 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#166 Post by Straze » Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:14 am

With housing estates currently at Virginia and been proposed at Buckland Park and Two Wells, what town next.. St Kilda, Middle Beach or maybe Port Gawler.
Do yourself a favour and come to South Australia.

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#167 Post by skyliner » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:11 pm

They've got to get into closing the gaps and mid rise much more quicky to prevent this massive sprawl. Brisbane let it happen without infill and now it is everywhere - appearing and disappearing too frequently - outer suburbs just too far from CBD and all needed facilities. What keeps trhis going of course is cheaper land and thus housing.

SA - STATE ON THE MOVE
Jack.

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#168 Post by Prince George » Sat Feb 13, 2010 10:52 pm

Straze wrote:With housing estates currently at Virginia and been proposed at Buckland Park and Two Wells, what town next.. St Kilda, Middle Beach or maybe Port Gawler.
Thanks to the Northern Expressway, expect to see more at Freeling or Kapunda.

fabricator
Legendary Member!
Posts: 537
Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:13 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#169 Post by fabricator » Sun Feb 14, 2010 10:47 am

Prince George wrote:
Straze wrote:With housing estates currently at Virginia and been proposed at Buckland Park and Two Wells, what town next.. St Kilda, Middle Beach or maybe Port Gawler.
Thanks to the Northern Expressway, expect to see more at Freeling or Kapunda.
Which will be getting rail line extensions (as per the 30 year plan), and is recent discussions the state government have decided to only allow major housing estates in these areas (and Gawler East) if the rail line is part of the project.

Unlike Virginia/Buckland Park/Two Wells which is still unmentioned. Heck we haven't even heard the state government talking about bus services to this area.
AdelaideNow: Now with 300% more Liberal Party hacks, at no extra cost.

iTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#170 Post by iTouch » Wed Feb 17, 2010 5:30 pm

Unlike Virginia/Buckland Park/Two Wells which is still unmentioned. Heck we haven't even heard the state government talking about bus services to this area.
My retarded solution to this retarded idea: A 600m tall Residential tower so the residents can use parachutes to get to the nearest bus stop
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)

Straze
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:50 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#171 Post by Straze » Wed Feb 17, 2010 9:58 pm

I am against this proposed housing development because it is stupid and irresponsible. Why? There is no regular public transport, not enough employment areas nearby, lack of community facilities i.e shops, banks, doctor surgerys, parks, schools and police stations. Therefore residents will generally be forced to drive as far as Salisbury or Elizabeth, which is bad for the environment and peoples budgets.
Do yourself a favour and come to South Australia.

iTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:37 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#172 Post by iTouch » Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:30 pm

I just looked at the place where buckland park is. Shouldnt this topic be in the Metro forum due to it being literally next to Virginia (a metro area) or is this a different Buckland park?
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2097
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#173 Post by AG » Sat Feb 20, 2010 10:39 pm

iTouch(myself) wrote:I just looked at the place where buckland park is. Shouldnt this topic be in the Metro forum due to it being literally next to Virginia (a metro area) or is this a different Buckland park?
Virginia is not part of the Adelaide metropolitan area, it is located just beyond the boundary.

User avatar
ChrisRT
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:24 am
Location: Radelaide!

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#174 Post by ChrisRT » Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:43 am

fabricator wrote: Unlike Virginia/Buckland Park/Two Wells which is still unmentioned. Heck we haven't even heard the state government talking about bus services to this area.
The EIS includes a public transport requirements analysis including demand modeling for rail services to Virginia. Some planned bus routes are also detailed. See - http://planning.sa.gov.au/index.cfm?obj ... B13562BF61

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#175 Post by monotonehell » Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:56 pm

ChrisRT wrote:
fabricator wrote: Unlike Virginia/Buckland Park/Two Wells which is still unmentioned. Heck we haven't even heard the state government talking about bus services to this area.
The EIS includes a public transport requirements analysis including demand modeling for rail services to Virginia. Some planned bus routes are also detailed. See - http://planning.sa.gov.au/index.cfm?obj ... B13562BF61
There's still more questions than answers so far. It's a chicken and egg situation with the EIS only coming to a reserved conclusion (which is no conclusion at all). The developers intend to run a 'community bus' that will link to the four services a day 900 bus at Virginia. But there's a question as to who will take over the costs of running this service after the developers wish to stop providing it. The Playford council don't wish to. The State wont until there's a sufficient number of residents out there to call for a service. The mention of the rail service is finger crossing on behalf of the developers, as the State has no plans to provide such.

So the bottom line is, unless this development gets past stage two there will be no PT or no school. There's no employment opportunities in the area, unless you count the planned shops (if they happen). The whole plan is still sounding like a car dependent slum in waiting.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3783
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#176 Post by Waewick » Sun Feb 21, 2010 10:46 pm

the more you read the more concern you get.

its going to be interesting development to say the least.

how_good_is_he
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:32 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#177 Post by how_good_is_he » Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:45 pm

I agree with the above but the wild card is if it becomes predominantly defence housing [v.close to Edinburgh] & so they don't have to rely on the traditional 1st homebuyer/new estate buyers [which may be limited].

User avatar
Paulns
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 470
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:55 am

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#178 Post by Paulns » Tue Feb 23, 2010 9:16 am

how_good_is_he wrote:but the wild card is if it becomes predominantly defence housing [v.close to Edinburgh] & so they don't have to rely on the traditional 1st homebuyer/new estate buyers [which may be limited].
Doubt it, the Playford Alive project and new estates around Blakeview (Delfin's Blakes Crossing), will already have the Defence housing stiched up. By the time this Buckland Park development gets up if it it does? Playford Alive will already be well established, the Army will already be settled at RAAF Base Edinburgh and there will be no to very little need for DHA (Defence Housing Authority) to worry about Buckland Park. After all 7RAR will be here this time next year anyway.
"SA GOING ALL THE WAY".

Straze
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:50 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#179 Post by Straze » Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:05 pm

Is the Army Depot moving soon from Broadmeadows, according to the Playford Alive brochure the land will be used for housing. I have been past on the train and was suprised by how much land there is, i wouldnt mind this area being transformed into a high density TOD.
Do yourself a favour and come to South Australia.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#180 Post by Omicron » Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:01 pm

I haven't hardly considered objective arguments in this case because the subjective ones are so painfully overwhelming that my (limited) brain struggles to extend to rationality. It's a dreadful hole of a location in the middle of hideous flat wastelands that will be populated by residents who have to live there, rather than those who want to. It's cut off from the ocean because there are miles and miles of thick mangroves in the way, it's an entire day trip into town, and it will inevitably be filled with unattractive homes built by clueless people (propped up by artificial government incentives and hence really can't afford a home anyway) who manage to make a brand-new house look fifteen years out-of-date and show a complete and utter inability to maintain a respectable garden.

There, I said it.

[/rant]

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests