Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
With housing estates currently at Virginia and been proposed at Buckland Park and Two Wells, what town next.. St Kilda, Middle Beach or maybe Port Gawler.
Do yourself a favour and come to South Australia.
- skyliner
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
- Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
They've got to get into closing the gaps and mid rise much more quicky to prevent this massive sprawl. Brisbane let it happen without infill and now it is everywhere - appearing and disappearing too frequently - outer suburbs just too far from CBD and all needed facilities. What keeps trhis going of course is cheaper land and thus housing.
SA - STATE ON THE MOVE
SA - STATE ON THE MOVE
Jack.
- Prince George
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 974
- Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
- Location: Melrose Park
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Thanks to the Northern Expressway, expect to see more at Freeling or Kapunda.Straze wrote:With housing estates currently at Virginia and been proposed at Buckland Park and Two Wells, what town next.. St Kilda, Middle Beach or maybe Port Gawler.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:13 pm
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Which will be getting rail line extensions (as per the 30 year plan), and is recent discussions the state government have decided to only allow major housing estates in these areas (and Gawler East) if the rail line is part of the project.Prince George wrote:Thanks to the Northern Expressway, expect to see more at Freeling or Kapunda.Straze wrote:With housing estates currently at Virginia and been proposed at Buckland Park and Two Wells, what town next.. St Kilda, Middle Beach or maybe Port Gawler.
Unlike Virginia/Buckland Park/Two Wells which is still unmentioned. Heck we haven't even heard the state government talking about bus services to this area.
AdelaideNow: Now with 300% more Liberal Party hacks, at no extra cost.
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
My retarded solution to this retarded idea: A 600m tall Residential tower so the residents can use parachutes to get to the nearest bus stopUnlike Virginia/Buckland Park/Two Wells which is still unmentioned. Heck we haven't even heard the state government talking about bus services to this area.
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
I am against this proposed housing development because it is stupid and irresponsible. Why? There is no regular public transport, not enough employment areas nearby, lack of community facilities i.e shops, banks, doctor surgerys, parks, schools and police stations. Therefore residents will generally be forced to drive as far as Salisbury or Elizabeth, which is bad for the environment and peoples budgets.
Do yourself a favour and come to South Australia.
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
I just looked at the place where buckland park is. Shouldnt this topic be in the Metro forum due to it being literally next to Virginia (a metro area) or is this a different Buckland park?
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Virginia is not part of the Adelaide metropolitan area, it is located just beyond the boundary.iTouch(myself) wrote:I just looked at the place where buckland park is. Shouldnt this topic be in the Metro forum due to it being literally next to Virginia (a metro area) or is this a different Buckland park?
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
The EIS includes a public transport requirements analysis including demand modeling for rail services to Virginia. Some planned bus routes are also detailed. See - http://planning.sa.gov.au/index.cfm?obj ... B13562BF61fabricator wrote: Unlike Virginia/Buckland Park/Two Wells which is still unmentioned. Heck we haven't even heard the state government talking about bus services to this area.
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
There's still more questions than answers so far. It's a chicken and egg situation with the EIS only coming to a reserved conclusion (which is no conclusion at all). The developers intend to run a 'community bus' that will link to the four services a day 900 bus at Virginia. But there's a question as to who will take over the costs of running this service after the developers wish to stop providing it. The Playford council don't wish to. The State wont until there's a sufficient number of residents out there to call for a service. The mention of the rail service is finger crossing on behalf of the developers, as the State has no plans to provide such.ChrisRT wrote:The EIS includes a public transport requirements analysis including demand modeling for rail services to Virginia. Some planned bus routes are also detailed. See - http://planning.sa.gov.au/index.cfm?obj ... B13562BF61fabricator wrote: Unlike Virginia/Buckland Park/Two Wells which is still unmentioned. Heck we haven't even heard the state government talking about bus services to this area.
So the bottom line is, unless this development gets past stage two there will be no PT or no school. There's no employment opportunities in the area, unless you count the planned shops (if they happen). The whole plan is still sounding like a car dependent slum in waiting.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
the more you read the more concern you get.
its going to be interesting development to say the least.
its going to be interesting development to say the least.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 9:32 pm
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
I agree with the above but the wild card is if it becomes predominantly defence housing [v.close to Edinburgh] & so they don't have to rely on the traditional 1st homebuyer/new estate buyers [which may be limited].
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Doubt it, the Playford Alive project and new estates around Blakeview (Delfin's Blakes Crossing), will already have the Defence housing stiched up. By the time this Buckland Park development gets up if it it does? Playford Alive will already be well established, the Army will already be settled at RAAF Base Edinburgh and there will be no to very little need for DHA (Defence Housing Authority) to worry about Buckland Park. After all 7RAR will be here this time next year anyway.how_good_is_he wrote:but the wild card is if it becomes predominantly defence housing [v.close to Edinburgh] & so they don't have to rely on the traditional 1st homebuyer/new estate buyers [which may be limited].
"SA GOING ALL THE WAY".
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
Is the Army Depot moving soon from Broadmeadows, according to the Playford Alive brochure the land will be used for housing. I have been past on the train and was suprised by how much land there is, i wouldnt mind this area being transformed into a high density TOD.
Do yourself a favour and come to South Australia.
Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development
I haven't hardly considered objective arguments in this case because the subjective ones are so painfully overwhelming that my (limited) brain struggles to extend to rationality. It's a dreadful hole of a location in the middle of hideous flat wastelands that will be populated by residents who have to live there, rather than those who want to. It's cut off from the ocean because there are miles and miles of thick mangroves in the way, it's an entire day trip into town, and it will inevitably be filled with unattractive homes built by clueless people (propped up by artificial government incentives and hence really can't afford a home anyway) who manage to make a brand-new house look fifteen years out-of-date and show a complete and utter inability to maintain a respectable garden.
There, I said it.
[/rant]
There, I said it.
[/rant]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest