[COM] 115 King William Street | 91m | 26lvls | Office
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
I really like it. Looks cool
Sounds a bit silly, but its the type of building you see in cities like New York or Chicago
Sounds a bit silly, but its the type of building you see in cities like New York or Chicago
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
To be honest I think it is horrible and will ruin King William Street.
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
its one of those buildings that has to be either fairly small or fairly tall. it can't be middlesize as it looks like a stunted minda
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
I like it. It's a shame about the King Will height restrictions. Really irritating actually.
More 80+ developments though and out skyline iwll change some what. Can't wait for Harris Scarfe building to get under way.
More 80+ developments though and out skyline iwll change some what. Can't wait for Harris Scarfe building to get under way.
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
It does amuse me that these height restrictions of ours are such as if Westpac House never existed. Newsflash: it does. OMIGOSH PLANEZ WILL CRASH. HERITAGE IZ ROOINED.
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
does the harris scruff building project exceed height limits?
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
No, height limits are higher on that side of the city.iTouch(myself) wrote:does the harris scruff building project exceed height limits?
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
Interesting that no Western perspective is provided.
Keep Adelaide Weird
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
When will this be sent to the council for approval?
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
There's an elevation here:SRW wrote:Interesting that no Western perspective is provided.
http://www.adelaidecitycouncil.com/adcc ... proval.pdf p4
But no perspective because the building is less visible from the west anyway.
Also interesting to note that the floor levels exactly match the building to the south.
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
Thank you for the PDF. I just wanted confirmation that there are windows to that face.
Keep Adelaide Weird
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
I think someone mentioned this before, but it is a bit odd that a 25 level building has no lift foyers. The ground floor shows letable space for the entire floor, but with no common area for security or tenants above to gain access to the lifts.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
- wilkiebarkid
- Donating Member
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Adelaide
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
The ACC has voted NO to this one (too tall for the location and doesn't compliment surrounding heritage buildings!), however it doesn't rest with them as it is more than $10m.
- Nathan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3816
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 1:09 pm
- Location: Bowden
- Contact:
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
Doesn't complement the surrounding heritage buildings? Like what, the Adam Internet building??wilkiebarkid wrote:The ACC has voted NO to this one (too tall for the location and doesn't compliment surrounding heritage buildings!), however it doesn't rest with them as it is more than $10m.
- wilkiebarkid
- Donating Member
- Posts: 601
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:19 am
- Location: Adelaide
[COM] Re: PRO: 115 King William St | 86M | 25lvls | Office
We are fortunate that the ACC decision doesn't count for anything. This building would be great for KWS. I guess it will be the tallest building in the street, and nicely standing out amongst the 15-18 story wall.Nathan wrote:Doesn't complement the surrounding heritage buildings? Like what, the Adam Internet building??wilkiebarkid wrote:The ACC has voted NO to this one (too tall for the location and doesn't compliment surrounding heritage buildings!), however it doesn't rest with them as it is more than $10m.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 6 guests