Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
-
bm7500
- Donating Member
- Posts: 901
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#331
Post
by bm7500 » Fri May 07, 2010 10:54 am
kenget wrote:
Nice find.. no hotel though
Provision for the hotel has been included in the plans. There are 2 more pdf documents that form part of this document:
http://www.aal.com.au/corporate/planning.aspx
In addition to this, there will be alowance of a corridor in the traffic management plan to provide a future light rail link to the front of the terminal
What is also interesting is that whilst this is only a prelinimary draft, according to the timelines provided some relocation of business and the GA terminal is already underway
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA
-
Brando
- Donating Member
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2005 3:11 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#332
Post
by Brando » Tue May 11, 2010 6:24 pm
Am i correct in saying there will be no footbridge connecting the car park to the elevated level for depatures?
That will be crazy to go through all this trouble of building a multi story car park and expect people to still have to walk in the weather elements.
-
Paulns
- Donating Member
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:55 am
#333
Post
by Paulns » Wed May 12, 2010 8:19 am
Brando wrote:That will be crazy to go through all this trouble of building a multi story car park and expect people to still have to walk in the weather elements.
I agree.
Does anyone know if this proposal for the carpark and plaza will still allow you to use the elevated ramp for drop offs at departures as is now??
"SA GOING ALL THE WAY".
-
Ho Really
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2715
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
- Location: In your head
#334
Post
by Ho Really » Thu May 13, 2010 12:27 pm
yousername wrote:Ho Really wrote:[...]
Adelaide Airport Ltd managing director Phil Baker was...Asked about additional international carriers coming to Adelaide, he said "We are very close to one or two; and also one or two we have been close to are moving away.
[...]
Strange, no comments from anyone regarding this? Wouldn't want to see either Malaysia, Singapore or Cathay Pacific go. Maybe it will be Air New Zealand that will go after Virgin Blue's announcement it's planning to create an alliance with the kiwis on the trans-Tasman market (see article below). If that's true it will be sad to see them go, but I would rather that than lose the asian air carriers.
Any thoughts on what Phil Baker meant?
Cheers
I thought he was talking about having been in talks with up to four carriers to start routes to ADL - two of which have decided against coming here.
You are right. I miss-read the whole statement
Not sure what the Virgin Blue-Air New Zealand alliance will do to the Trans-Tasman service, but I hope I'm wrong about the kiwis leaving us.
Wouldn't mind knowing who the two airlines were that decided not to come here.
Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
-
bm7500
- Donating Member
- Posts: 901
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#335
Post
by bm7500 » Fri May 14, 2010 11:20 am
In a rather dissapointing development.. Emirates have indicated they won't be flying to ADL while there's a curfew in force.
"Speaking yesterday at The West Australian's Leadership Matters series, Emirates divisional vice-president commercial Richard Vaughan warned that the airline would not fly to Adelaide because of its curfew. "When Adelaide wakes, we might be interested," he said."
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/br ... es-growth/
Its sad to hear that Adeaide is still considered a sleepy city and one that is hampered by its airport curfew....
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA
-
skyliner
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
- Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)
#336
Post
by skyliner » Fri May 14, 2010 4:27 pm
Brings to mind the shock we had when we came there in 1973 - pubs closed at 6.00PM and no service stations open after 6.00 till you got to Darlington. All others operated by 20c coins. Things HAVE changed a bit since then, but still disappointing to read Emirates comment.
SA - STATE ON THE MOVE
Jack.
-
duke149
- Sen-Rookie-Sational
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:27 pm
#337
Post
by duke149 » Thu May 27, 2010 12:11 pm
bm7500 wrote:Its sad to hear that Adeaide is still considered a sleepy city and one that is hampered by its airport curfew....
Considered because its fact. We need the people who have bought a house next to the airport to realise they bought a house next to the airport.
I don't complain that cars drive next to my house at night because I know I bought a house on a main road.
-
crawf
- Donating Member
- Posts: 5527
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#338
Post
by crawf » Thu May 27, 2010 1:22 pm
Sydney has a airport curfew...
-
bm7500
- Donating Member
- Posts: 901
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#339
Post
by bm7500 » Thu May 27, 2010 2:37 pm
crawf wrote:Sydney has a airport curfew...
Very true! With the same curfew hours as Adelaide....and yet Sydney airport handles many international airlines everyday including no fewer than 5 daily services by Emirates!!
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA
-
Paulns
- Donating Member
- Posts: 470
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:55 am
#340
Post
by Paulns » Fri May 28, 2010 10:49 pm
bm7500 wrote:Very true! With the same curfew hours as Adelaide....and yet Sydney airport handles many international airlines everyday including no fewer than 5 daily services by Emirates!!
Yeah but Sydney has 4 times the population of Adelaide and they still consider Adelaide a large town. You can't compare.
"SA GOING ALL THE WAY".
-
frank1
- Donating Member
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:54 pm
#341
Post
by frank1 » Sat May 29, 2010 1:23 am
Sydney not only has the population, but australian aviation started there and it has over 100,000 employees.
I think adelaide actually does pretty well for itself considering its geographic location and population....i mean it does handle 7million ppl/year.
-
bm7500
- Donating Member
- Posts: 901
- Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#342
Post
by bm7500 » Sun May 30, 2010 1:44 pm
Paulns wrote:bm7500 wrote:Very true! With the same curfew hours as Adelaide....and yet Sydney airport handles many international airlines everyday including no fewer than 5 daily services by Emirates!!
Yeah but Sydney has 4 times the population of Adelaide and they still consider Adelaide a large town. You can't compare.
I'm not trying to compare, just pointing out the facts. Sydney has 4 times the population as you say but 5 times the number of flights by EK!!!
It is a fact that Adelaide is underserviced by International airlines, in fact a large number of people travel to Melbourne on Virgin Blue flights that connect directly to Emirates flights, according to a Melbourne airport souce enough pax to justify our own direct service.
The problem is that there is a stigma about Adelaide being a tough market to crack and even harder to sustain a new airservice and crew base here. Few new International airlines will fly to Adelaide until there is a change of perception, one that could have been changed by developments such as Olympic Dam etc, but that may now not come to fruition thanks to the Rudd Government's Mining Tax.... but thats a whole other story...
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA
-
rubberman
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2006
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
#343
Post
by rubberman » Sun May 30, 2010 6:20 pm
I don't want to derail the thread, but I cannot let that mining tax thing go past.
There is every reason to believe that the mining tax may increase the likelihood of airlines coming to Adelaide.
At the present, there is an argument out there that the winners from the tax are likely the shareholders, government, and workers. The losers are likely to be top management. Hence the hoo-hah.
Like I said, this is not really the place to discuss it, but do check out the various pro and con arguments out there - it is not as simple as the mining management would like you to believe.
-
Maximus
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:05 pm
- Location: The Bush Capital (Canberra)
#344
Post
by Maximus » Tue Jun 01, 2010 12:05 pm
bm7500 wrote:In a rather dissapointing development.. Emirates have indicated they won't be flying to ADL while there's a curfew in force.
"Speaking yesterday at The West Australian's Leadership Matters series, Emirates divisional vice-president commercial Richard Vaughan warned that the airline would not fly to Adelaide because of its curfew. "When Adelaide wakes, we might be interested," he said."
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/br ... es-growth/
Its sad to hear that Adeaide is still considered a sleepy city and one that is hampered by its airport curfew....
Do we know
why Emirates (and other airlines) cite the curfew for not flying to Adelaide? I don't imagine that flights landing between 11pm - 6am would be all that popular with passengers. But presumably it has something to do with cost (and/or scheduling in Dubai)...?
It's = it is; its = everything else.
You're = you are; your = belongs to.
Than = comparative ("bigger than"); then = next.
-
Aidan
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2140
- Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
- Location: Christies Beach
#345
Post
by Aidan » Tue Jun 01, 2010 1:27 pm
Maximus wrote:bm7500 wrote:In a rather dissapointing development.. Emirates have indicated they won't be flying to ADL while there's a curfew in force.
"Speaking yesterday at The West Australian's Leadership Matters series, Emirates divisional vice-president commercial Richard Vaughan warned that the airline would not fly to Adelaide because of its curfew. "When Adelaide wakes, we might be interested," he said."
Do we know
why Emirates (and other airlines) cite the curfew for not flying to Adelaide? I don't imagine that flights landing between 11pm - 6am would be all that popular with passengers. But presumably it has something to do with cost (and/or scheduling in Dubai)...?
I'd heard it was a scheduling issue relating to the time the flights take. Dubai to Adelaide is too short, and extending the flight to NZ is made difficult by the curfew. But the five daily flights to Sydney undermine that argument somewhat.
As for unpopular flight times, most passengers find it difficult to sleep on the plane anyway and nearly everyone would be jetlagged. Under these circumstances even a 3am landing is unlikely to be a problem for passengers.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 3 guests