[COM] Urbanest | 59/53m | 20/18lvls | Apartments

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#361 Post by monotonehell » Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:00 pm

AG wrote:
bm7500 wrote:Great pics X, shame about the impact of that large expanse of blank Eastern facing wall though :roll:
It wasn't ever going to be anything but a blank wall due to building design regulations that relate to the safety of adjacent buildings built right up to their property boundaries. It isn't really worth whinging about, particularly if another similar sized building gets built next door in future. You don't exactly want a window staring right into the neighbouring building, do you?
Considering the building next door looks like it's not going anywhere perhaps they'll give the blank concrete an aesthetic treatment of some sort.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

iTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:37 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#362 Post by iTouch » Wed Jul 07, 2010 9:18 pm

AG wrote:
bm7500 wrote:Great pics X, shame about the impact of that large expanse of blank Eastern facing wall though :roll:
It wasn't ever going to be anything but a blank wall due to building design regulations that relate to the safety of adjacent buildings built right up to their property boundaries. It isn't really worth whinging about, particularly if another similar sized building gets built next door in future. You don't exactly want a window staring right into the neighbouring building, do you?
depends... if the neighbouring building happens to contain Playboy bunnies then maybe... if it happens to contain an inner-city retirement village then Russian Roulette may become a nice tourist attraction for Urbanest :)
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)

User avatar
Zills
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:59 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#363 Post by Zills » Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:48 pm

AG wrote:
bm7500 wrote:Great pics X, shame about the impact of that large expanse of blank Eastern facing wall though :roll:
It wasn't ever going to be anything but a blank wall due to building design regulations that relate to the safety of adjacent buildings built right up to their property boundaries. It isn't really worth whinging about, particularly if another similar sized building gets built next door in future. You don't exactly want a window staring right into the neighbouring building, do you?
why does no one understand this!?

iTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:37 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#364 Post by iTouch » Thu Jul 08, 2010 6:38 pm

it's now taller then the old QANTAS building, and is getting to be almost as tall as the Stamford (I don't think it'll reach it though, but yer :P)
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#365 Post by Prince George » Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:48 am

zills_86 wrote:
AG wrote:
bm7500 wrote:Great pics X, shame about the impact of that large expanse of blank Eastern facing wall though :roll:
It wasn't ever going to be anything but a blank wall due to building design regulations that relate to the safety of adjacent buildings built right up to their property boundaries. It isn't really worth whinging about, particularly if another similar sized building gets built next door in future. You don't exactly want a window staring right into the neighbouring building, do you?
why does no one understand this!?
You may understand it, and still bemoan it.

User avatar
Zills
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 100
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 8:59 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#366 Post by Zills » Fri Jul 09, 2010 6:26 pm

Prince George wrote:You may understand it, and still bemoan it.
[/quote]

heheh very well spoken prince george.

User avatar
bm7500
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#367 Post by bm7500 » Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:19 am

bm7500 wrote:Great pics X, shame about the impact of that large expanse of blank Eastern facing wall though :roll:
Prince George wrote:
zills_86 wrote:
AG wrote: It wasn't ever going to be anything but a blank wall due to building design regulations that relate to the safety of adjacent buildings built right up to their property boundaries. It isn't really worth whinging about, particularly if another similar sized building gets built next door in future. You don't exactly want a window staring right into the neighbouring building, do you?
why does no one understand this!?
You may understand it, and still bemoan it.
Thankyou Prince George. i DO understand it very clearly and yes i still bemoan it.....however it doesn't mean that the wall has to be a plain expanse of nothingness. As Mono suggested, i hope they give that facade an interesting treatment to lessen the obvious impact of an otherwise boring wall that is so visible.

On a side note; It appears that with the notably fewer number of new and progressing developments happening in Adelaide at the moment (and as such, posted on this forum), that some of the members of S-A are resorting more and more to nit picking and tiresome argumentative posts just to pass their time....Lets hope for the sake of this forum and more importantly for our great City, that some new developments of significance are announced or started soon.

<End of Rant>
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#368 Post by skyliner » Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:06 pm

In your last para you have touched on something I have also noted bm7500. One would hope that the things you mentioned do halt - unfortunately cuts the tone of the forum down. I end up just skimming this kind of thing.

SA - STATE ON THE MOVE
Jack.

iTouch
Legendary Member!
Posts: 551
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:37 pm

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#369 Post by iTouch » Sat Jul 10, 2010 2:25 pm

who knows? they could put a sign up on that wall as big as the sign for the Crowne Plaza in Hindmarsh square. That sign changes everything and makes the building look fantastic
Don't burn the Adelaide Parkland (preservation society)

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#370 Post by crawf » Sat Jul 10, 2010 3:49 pm

It would be blocked by the Stamford Plaza and old Qantas House

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5860
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#371 Post by Will » Sat Jul 10, 2010 11:24 pm

crawf wrote:It would be blocked by the Stamford Plaza and old Qantas House
Not to mention that the building next to it is NOT heritage listed and hence could be developed anytime soon.

There is no point beautifying a property boundary. It is an unnecessary cost.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#372 Post by AG » Sun Jul 11, 2010 10:47 am

Will wrote:
crawf wrote:It would be blocked by the Stamford Plaza and old Qantas House
Not to mention that the building next to it is NOT heritage listed and hence could be developed anytime soon.

There is no point beautifying a property boundary. It is an unnecessary cost.
On top of that, the blank wall provides the building with fire protection should a fire happen to break out in the neighbouring property.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3650
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#373 Post by SRW » Sun Jul 11, 2010 12:21 pm

AG wrote:
Will wrote:
crawf wrote:It would be blocked by the Stamford Plaza and old Qantas House
Not to mention that the building next to it is NOT heritage listed and hence could be developed anytime soon.

There is no point beautifying a property boundary. It is an unnecessary cost.
On top of that, the blank wall provides the building with fire protection should a fire happen to break out in the neighbouring property.
That's all well and good, but I think there are two points to be made. One is that not all blank walls are made equal; you can have a blank wall that meets all the necessary fire protection requirements, yet still has a treatment which is not aesthetically offensive (if not pleasing). The other, and more important, point is that it is eminently possible to design buildings that are not mindless upward extensions of plot boundaries, and therefore buildings that do not require blank walls. I think this is what some of us would like to see.

Although, that said, I actually like this development and think that it is one of the more acceptable circumstances of a blank wall.
Keep Adelaide Weird

User avatar
Pikey
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2481
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 7:41 am
Location: Sitting Down

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#374 Post by Pikey » Sun Jul 11, 2010 6:23 pm

Don't forget, none of the painting of this building has started yet, we might be pleasantly surprised with a few coats of gray on the eastern boundary.
Walking on over....

| Sensational-Adelaide.com Moderator |

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: UC: Urbanest 140 North Tce | 59&53m | 20&18lvl | Apts

#375 Post by crawf » Wed Jul 14, 2010 4:58 pm

The ugly eastern wall - taken today
Image

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 6 guests