Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
-
stumpjumper
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm
#571
Post
by stumpjumper » Sat Jul 24, 2010 1:22 pm
I blame this syndrome on the Advertiser.
I blame it on Mike Rann.
The current RAH site is next to the East End precinct, Rundle Street has numerous pubs and a couple clubs and plenty of drunks. There is also a pub right across the road from the RAH, and PJ Obriens etc right around the side to that. It's never been an issue, so why would be an issue on the other end of North Terrace?
I'd say the main interaction between the present RAH and the East End pubs is that the pubs benefit greatly from being near the 9,000 (? - IIRC) employees of the RAH. It would be the same for the West End pubs if the hospital moved there. I managed the East End business association for a couple of years and I know the huge economic value of the hospital's staff and visitors to the East End. The continual presence of shift workers moving through the East End is also an important factor in 'keeping things nice' down there. Depending on what use is made of the remnant buildings of the RAH if the hospital is moved, the character of the East End could change considerably. Whatever the use might be, it won't involve the thousands of people who use the buildings now.
-
crawf
- Donating Member
- Posts: 5521
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#572
Post
by crawf » Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:31 pm
stumpjumper wrote:I blame this syndrome on the Advertiser.
I blame it on Mike Rann.
Don't we know it.
-
Will
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#573
Post
by Will » Sat Jul 24, 2010 10:58 pm
crawf wrote:stumpjumper wrote:I blame this syndrome on the Advertiser.
I blame it on Mike Rann.
Don't we know it.
The Advertiser has been throwing around the term 'world class' for decades now. I have newspaper articles from the 90's which are littered with the term.
-
Hooligan
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 907
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:03 pm
#574
Post
by Hooligan » Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:58 pm
I blame Mike Rann for the war in Iraq.
-
ricecrackers
- Banned
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:47 pm
#575
Post
by ricecrackers » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:18 pm
rev wrote:
People need to stop throwing around terms like world class so easily.
I blame this syndrome on the Advertiser.
We don't need things to be up to "world class" we need things to be right for Adelaide.
It's a valid argument because it's true actually. There are plenty of people who hold some pretty dated and defeatist attitudes when it comes to Adelaide and South Australia.
thats an Aussie thing
cultural cringe...inferiority complex whatever...its a syndrome of being an isolated country which is more of an economy than a real country and being of little relative importance in the world
If 50 million believe in a fallacy, it is still a fallacy..." Professor S.W. Carey
-
peas_and_corn
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:32 pm
#576
Post
by peas_and_corn » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:19 pm
Hooligan wrote:I blame Mike Rann for the war in Iraq.
The 1990 one!
-
monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
-
Contact:
#577
Post
by monotonehell » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:35 pm
ricecrackers wrote:thats an Aussie thing
It's not an Adelaide thing, it's not an Aussie thing, it happens all over the World. I read similar forums and comments pages from all over the place. And I'd challenge anyone to work out where the posts were talking about if all references to place names were removed.
I see the same discussions of "Iconic", "World class", "NIMBYs", "grass is always greener", "I'll have what she's having" "wont someone think of the children" and so on in every public discussion I've visited.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
ricecrackers
- Banned
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:47 pm
#578
Post
by ricecrackers » Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:19 am
I predict that if ostraya doesnt win the 2022 world cup bid this thing will get shelved because of a lack of business case
we'll still have phase 1 though
If 50 million believe in a fallacy, it is still a fallacy..." Professor S.W. Carey
-
Isiskii
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 3:29 pm
#579
Post
by Isiskii » Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:15 am
Just over a month to go yet before the August 31st deadline.
I don't feel confident that it will go ahead. The SANFL and SACA are both very selfish organizations. It's hard to see the two coming to a compromise resolution; and it seems that the overwhelming majority of SACA members are set to block the proposal anyway.
-
mattblack
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1108
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am
#580
Post
by mattblack » Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:29 am
ricecrackers wrote:I predict that if ostraya doesnt win the 2022 world cup bid this thing will get shelved because of a lack of business case
we'll still have phase 1 though
Im not sure if your a member or not (Ill guess not), but the presentation to the members about a month ago was very impressive and the business case was very strong. Not at one time during the meeting was the world cup bid bought up. This is a non issue in regards to proceeding with the development. There were concerns with certain aspects of the development with the members but things such as the carparking will be addressed in the final proposal. Other issues like loosing the view from the the members stand to the parklands to the west and drop in pitches were pretty much ridiculed by all but a small minority. If the proposal is comprehensive enough it will be passed for one reason, more money for the SACA.
-
ricecrackers
- Banned
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:47 pm
#581
Post
by ricecrackers » Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:49 pm
mattblack wrote:ricecrackers wrote:I predict that if ostraya doesnt win the 2022 world cup bid this thing will get shelved because of a lack of business case
we'll still have phase 1 though
Im not sure if your a member or not (Ill guess not), but the presentation to the members about a month ago was very impressive and the business case was very strong. Not at one time during the meeting was the world cup bid bought up. This is a non issue in regards to proceeding with the development. There were concerns with certain aspects of the development with the members but things such as the carparking will be addressed in the final proposal. Other issues like loosing the view from the the members stand to the parklands to the west and drop in pitches were pretty much ridiculed by all but a small minority. If the proposal is comprehensive enough it will be passed for one reason, more money for the SACA.
its great for SACA members and the SACA...the issue is the lack of business case for the half billion dollars in government funds...as well as the compensation the SANFL are demanding
this is not the SACA's money...dont pretend that it is
If 50 million believe in a fallacy, it is still a fallacy..." Professor S.W. Carey
-
stumpjumper
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm
#582
Post
by stumpjumper » Tue Jul 27, 2010 5:28 pm
If Rann, Foley and co decide that there is not much upside for them in pushing for 'phase 2' to be built, or if it otherwise becomes clear that the government could score points by withdrawing funding, they could probably find a way before everything is signed off. If there is a second dip of GFCV, for example, and in any case, that half billion must be looking very tempting as tactical expenditure to government members in marginal seats. A cynic might say that the scheme has done its job - it helped get the ALP over the line at the March 2010 election.
-
contractor
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:41 pm
#583
Post
by contractor » Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:57 pm
stumpjumper wrote:If Rann, Foley and co decide that there is not much upside for them in pushing for 'phase 2' to be built, or if it otherwise becomes clear that the government could score points by withdrawing funding, they could probably find a way before everything is signed off. If there is a second dip of GFCV, for example, and in any case, that half billion must be looking very tempting as tactical expenditure to government members in marginal seats. A cynic might say that the scheme has done its job - it helped get the ALP over the line at the March 2010 election.
That's the Labor spin machine for you.
Should be interesting to see what happens at the Federal election with Kate Ellis being the sitting member for Adelaide, incidently being held before the 31st August deadline.
-
Xaragmata
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
- Location: Adelaide / West
-
Contact:
#584
Post
by Xaragmata » Thu Jul 29, 2010 3:35 am
-
ricecrackers
- Banned
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:47 pm
#585
Post
by ricecrackers » Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:31 pm
I still find it hard to imagine 15000 people fitting in that stand...considering thats the capacity of Hindmarsh, it just doesnt look that big
If 50 million believe in a fallacy, it is still a fallacy..." Professor S.W. Carey
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], Semrush [Bot] and 4 guests