It could be, but certainly not in it's current state. I agree, the focus should be on bringing it up as a fantastic urban park, all the way around. Rundle, Rymill and Botanic Parks are ok (though not amazing), but the rest is unappealing scrub land. We have the space and location nailed, but maybe we need to look at how other cities with outstanding city parks do it, to get an idea on how to approach the content so to speak.stumpjumper wrote:That entity could be described as one of the world's great urban parks, on a par with Central Park in New York or London's great urban parks.
I think the park lands trail they're working on is a good start, with a circuit all the way around the city, but that also lacks anything interesting to actually jog or ride past. The loop around Tokyo's imperial palace is great (even if you disregard the palace grounds inside).
Obviously the big issue is money. The population of the CBD isn't very high, and none of the neighbouring councils (who also adjoin the parklands and benefit from them) contribute 1c towards helping. Something needs to budge there. Maybe by encouraging denser/higher/better development facing the parklands (pie crust effect or not) it will increase demand and incentive to actually improve the parklands they face.