Riverlea (Buckland Park) | 12,000 dwellings | $3b

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
Message
Author
User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#181 Post by drsmith » Wed Feb 24, 2010 8:49 pm

It's certainly not the West Virginia that John Denver had in mind.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfi3SSJPG9Y

User avatar
skyliner
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2359
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#182 Post by skyliner » Thu Feb 25, 2010 6:47 pm

That was in Wheeling anyway. No comparison. In my imagination the name had conjured up an attractive area due to associations with Virginia. I did'nt know how unattractive the area was tillI went there on 9/2/10 to look at the expressway. What a pity.

SA - STATE ON THE MOVE
Jack.

User avatar
Wilfy 2007
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:54 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#183 Post by Wilfy 2007 » Sat Mar 20, 2010 8:03 am

Omicron wrote:I haven't hardly considered objective arguments in this case because the subjective ones are so painfully overwhelming that my (limited) brain struggles to extend to rationality. It's a dreadful hole of a location in the middle of hideous flat wastelands that will be populated by residents who have to live there, rather than those who want to. It's cut off from the ocean because there are miles and miles of thick mangroves in the way, it's an entire day trip into town, and it will inevitably be filled with unattractive homes built by clueless people (propped up by artificial government incentives and hence really can't afford a home anyway) who manage to make a brand-new house look fifteen years out-of-date and show a complete and utter inability to maintain a respectable garden.

There, I said it.

[/rant]
Omicron,
My you do have attitude.
Have you forgotten how some of the current suburbs in adelaide started out in their very beginnings.
I remember the Ingle farm K-Mart being built, nothing around it for miles, but hey it is in the middle of suburbia now.
I think we all need a reality check.
Yes, there needs to be development along all the railway lines similar to what has been achieved in Sydney as they have some bigones, but you also need to cater for single income families who cannot afford to live closer to the city.
Believe it or not Adelaide has been doing this for years, but perhaps not on the scale it should have.

Recently i visited the St leanards Station in sydney which is a short walk from the North Shore Hospital. In and around and above the Railway station there are Houses, all types, shopping facilities, walking over passes, a very big facility over all and this is what is need ed in Adelaide.
But whom is going to invest that sort of money. These developments are huge, and of course Sydney has the population.

Of course Adelaides popoulation is projected to grow rapidly as well, but some big infastructure projects need to be built.

Regards,

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#184 Post by monotonehell » Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:20 pm

Wilfy 2007 wrote:...Have you forgotten how some of the current suburbs in adelaide started out in their very beginnings.
I remember the Ingle farm K-Mart being built, nothing around it for miles, but hey it is in the middle of suburbia now.
I think we all need a reality check...
Ingle Farm and the surrounding sprawl is a great example of how NOT to do it. There's no real transport out there other than the bus network. Most people drive. Why would we want to repeat previous mistakes, even further away from existing services and infrastructure?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Wilfy 2007
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 122
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 6:54 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#185 Post by Wilfy 2007 » Wed Mar 24, 2010 8:26 pm

monotonehell wrote:
Wilfy 2007 wrote:...Have you forgotten how some of the current suburbs in adelaide started out in their very beginnings.
I remember the Ingle farm K-Mart being built, nothing around it for miles, but hey it is in the middle of suburbia now.
I think we all need a reality check...
Ingle Farm and the surrounding sprawl is a great example of how NOT to do it. There's no real transport out there other than the bus network. Most people drive. Why would we want to repeat previous mistakes, even further away from existing services and infrastructure?
A bit off topic I know but if the northfield line was kept open it could have gone into Inglefarm and Para Hills.
Regards,

User avatar
PeFe
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 1672
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:47 am

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#186 Post by PeFe » Sun Mar 28, 2010 1:04 am

Buckland Park-all that is wrong with the mindless expansion of suburbia..no transport...no jobs...no schools....no leisure activities. If
I was 16 years old and living in Buckland Park in 2020 I would be playing the Sex Pistols very very loudly as I sang along to the words..
"No Future! No Future for me!"

stumpjumper
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#187 Post by stumpjumper » Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:59 am

There's a statutory public meeting tonight about the rezoning of Buckland Park, north of Adelaide.

In December 2006 and again just before the 2010 election, the government announced an agreement with the developer Vosporos for the development of a new township on the farmland. However, the government made the announcement without rezoning the land.

Now, although it is committed to the developer, the government has to go through a process of public consultation to decide the rezoning.

User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#188 Post by Prince George » Thu Aug 19, 2010 10:05 am

Not that I could attend, but where would that be?

stumpjumper
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#189 Post by stumpjumper » Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:15 pm

I never did find out, Prince G.

I was at Virginia this afternoon, though, and I can report that large areas of Buckland Park are under water, with further areas soggy. Choose your subdivided allotment carefully!

stumpjumper
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1497
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#190 Post by stumpjumper » Mon Sep 06, 2010 5:53 pm

Why would we want to repeat previous mistakes
...because that's what we do best in SA!

User avatar
monotonehell
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5466
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
Location: Adelaide, East End.
Contact:

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#191 Post by monotonehell » Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:48 pm

stumpjumper wrote:I never did find out, Prince G.

I was at Virginia this afternoon, though, and I can report that large areas of Buckland Park are under water, with further areas soggy. Choose your subdivided allotment carefully!
I recently revisited a former residence of mine. It was a sharehouse in the late '90s out that way. I noted that all the former flood plains had been built on. I remember trying to get into uni one some winter days when I couldn't catch a bus, as they had been cancelled because there was so much water flooding across the road.

And now there's houses there? WTF?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.

User avatar
Omicron
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2336
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 2:46 pm

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#192 Post by Omicron » Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:39 pm

monotonehell wrote:
stumpjumper wrote:I never did find out, Prince G.

I was at Virginia this afternoon, though, and I can report that large areas of Buckland Park are under water, with further areas soggy. Choose your subdivided allotment carefully!
I recently revisited a former residence of mine. It was a sharehouse in the late '90s out that way. I noted that all the former flood plains had been built on. I remember trying to get into uni one some winter days when I couldn't catch a bus, as they had been cancelled because there was so much water flooding across the road.

And now there's houses there? WTF?
It's the same story at Murray Bridge - the western bank is now covered by houses.

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2093
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#193 Post by AG » Sun Dec 12, 2010 10:36 pm

I wonder how well this development will be designed to deal with the odd flood that hits the Gawler River like recently, considering the river itself marks the northern boundary of the development.

By the way, this one now has its own website: http://www.bucklandpark.com.au/

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#194 Post by drsmith » Wed Dec 15, 2010 11:39 am

AG wrote:I wonder how well this development will be designed to deal with the odd flood that hits the Gawler River like recently, considering the river itself marks the northern boundary of the development.
As it stands, a fair bit of it would require rubber boots in a 1 in 100 year flood event if you don't want to get your feet wet. Towards the southern end, a boat might be better.

http://www.bucklandpark.com.au/picsmaps ... _Event.pdf

Drainage channels are proposed however.

http://www.bucklandpark.com.au/picsmaps ... annels.pdf

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

#195 Post by drsmith » Wed Dec 15, 2010 12:57 pm

Public transport plan.

http://www.bucklandpark.com.au/picsmaps ... taging.pdf

Of note is what looks like entry and exit ramps at Port Wakefield Road, suggestive of grade seperation.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: baytram366, Bing [Bot] and 1 guest