News & Discussion: Adelaide Airport & Airlines

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Maximus
Legendary Member!
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: The Bush Capital (Canberra)

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#421 Post by Maximus » Thu Mar 10, 2011 12:40 pm

metro wrote:that has to be the biggest joke, Adelaide Airport being called a "regional" airport :lol:
It is, yes. But, on the other hand, it probably gives us a better chance of attracting more international flights than if we were competing on the same footing with Syd/Mel/Bris/Per (as demonstrated by the article above).
muzzamo wrote:Is Adelaide an international hub? How many people transfer from interstate domestic flights to international flights in adelaide?
Few to none, I would have thought. I can't really imagine any realistic scenarios where someone would do this.
It's = it is; its = everything else.
You're = you are; your = belongs to.
Than = comparative ("bigger than"); then = next.

User avatar
Splashmo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#422 Post by Splashmo » Thu Mar 10, 2011 10:30 pm

Maximus wrote:It is, yes. But, on the other hand, it probably gives us a better chance of attracting more international flights than if we were competing on the same footing with Syd/Mel/Bris/Per (as demonstrated by the article above).
Being designated as a regional airport gives us our best chance of attracting international flights. Foreign airlines are allowed to have only so many flights into Australia, and they're hardly going to use up their quota in Adelaide when they could be flying to Sydney or Melbourne.

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#423 Post by Aidan » Sat Mar 12, 2011 3:19 pm

Splashmo wrote:
Maximus wrote:It is, yes. But, on the other hand, it probably gives us a better chance of attracting more international flights than if we were competing on the same footing with Syd/Mel/Bris/Per (as demonstrated by the article above).
Being designated as a regional airport gives us our best chance of attracting international flights. Foreign airlines are allowed to have only so many flights into Australia, and they're hardly going to use up their quota in Adelaide when they could be flying to Sydney or Melbourne.
Even if Adelaide benefits, this seems to me to be very bad policy. Firstly I think quotas are a bad idea - a market based approach is better. Secondly, even if the government insist on quotas, encouraging stopovers without cabotage is either a waste of capacity or an encouragement to fly significantly further than they otherwise would (the classic example being Adelaide to Singapore via Melbourne). Either way it's a waste of fuel.

I think I've said before that I'd like to see cabotage allowed on Adelaide flights stopping at regional airports. I still believe this to be the case, but there are two non-policy obstacles. The first is that few regional airports are set up to handle international passengers. But I'd expect the facilities would be introduced if the airlines wanted to go there. The second problem is more serious: regional airports generally have fairly short runways unsuitable for widebody aircraft. I think the Boeing 787 will solve this problem, but I've not actually seen any data on its runway requirements.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

User avatar
Splashmo
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 373
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:14 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#424 Post by Splashmo » Sat Mar 12, 2011 5:10 pm

Aidan wrote:Even if Adelaide benefits, this seems to me to be very bad policy. Firstly I think quotas are a bad idea - a market based approach is better. Secondly, even if the government insist on quotas, encouraging stopovers without cabotage is either a waste of capacity or an encouragement to fly significantly further than they otherwise would (the classic example being Adelaide to Singapore via Melbourne). Either way it's a waste of fuel.

I think I've said before that I'd like to see cabotage allowed on Adelaide flights stopping at regional airports. I still believe this to be the case, but there are two non-policy obstacles. The first is that few regional airports are set up to handle international passengers. But I'd expect the facilities would be introduced if the airlines wanted to go there. The second problem is more serious: regional airports generally have fairly short runways unsuitable for widebody aircraft. I think the Boeing 787 will solve this problem, but I've not actually seen any data on its runway requirements.
It would be safe to say that a good chunk of all international passengers out of Adelaide are stopping in Melbourne or Sydney anyway, because they're connecting with Qantas, Jetstar or Virgin. It's also worth noting that the Cathay Pacific flight into Adelaide lands here first, before continuing onto Melbourne, so in effect that's a good thing if you're just coming here. It's the same when the Qantas flight to Singapore left Sydney and came through Adelaide before heading overseas. Anything to encourage more flights through Adelaide should be taken onboard. Ideally we'd have pure and simple direct flights, but I don't think the waste of fuel idea applies if you have passengers paying to travel and therefore using that fuel.

When they talk of regional airports as stop-overs, they mean places like Adelaide, Darwin, Cairns, the Gold Coast and Broome - airports that can handle large jets and places where people want to go or depart from. They're not talking about 747s being forced to stop at Whyalla or Coober Pedy.

I think you're a bit confused as well, because I can't conceive a situation where a flight would be stopping at another regional airport before continuing to Adelaide and then onto the big four.

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#425 Post by Aidan » Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:50 pm

Splashmo wrote:
Aidan wrote:Even if Adelaide benefits, this seems to me to be very bad policy. Firstly I think quotas are a bad idea - a market based approach is better. Secondly, even if the government insist on quotas, encouraging stopovers without cabotage is either a waste of capacity or an encouragement to fly significantly further than they otherwise would (the classic example being Adelaide to Singapore via Melbourne). Either way it's a waste of fuel.

I think I've said before that I'd like to see cabotage allowed on Adelaide flights stopping at regional airports. I still believe this to be the case, but there are two non-policy obstacles. The first is that few regional airports are set up to handle international passengers. But I'd expect the facilities would be introduced if the airlines wanted to go there. The second problem is more serious: regional airports generally have fairly short runways unsuitable for widebody aircraft. I think the Boeing 787 will solve this problem, but I've not actually seen any data on its runway requirements.
It would be safe to say that a good chunk of all international passengers out of Adelaide are stopping in Melbourne or Sydney anyway, because they're connecting with Qantas, Jetstar or Virgin.
And usually that's because of a lack of direct flights.
It's also worth noting that the Cathay Pacific flight into Adelaide lands here first, before continuing onto Melbourne, so in effect that's a good thing if you're just coming here. It's the same when the Qantas flight to Singapore left Sydney and came through Adelaide before heading overseas. Anything to encourage more flights through Adelaide should be taken onboard. Ideally we'd have pure and simple direct flights, but I don't think the waste of fuel idea applies if you have passengers paying to travel and therefore using that fuel.
Surely it does if they're paying to travel in a direction that takes them further away from where they actually want to go?
When they talk of regional airports as stop-overs, they mean places like Adelaide, Darwin, Cairns, the Gold Coast and Broome - airports that can handle large jets and places where people want to go or depart from. They're not talking about 747s being forced to stop at Whyalla or Coober Pedy.
Of course, but the Gold Coast runway is significantly shorter than that of Brisbane, for example.
I think you're a bit confused as well, because I can't conceive a situation where a flight would be stopping at another regional airport before continuing to Adelaide and then onto the big four.
I think you're the one who's confused, because I'm not suggesting going on to the big four, and I would not support cabotage to any of them.

I'm thinking of things like:
Adelaide to Honolulu via Sunshine Coast
Adelaide to Manilla via Darwin
Adelaide to Surabaya via Broome - possibly as an extension of Air Asia's flight from our sister city Georgetown (Penang) to Surabaya.

Most places are on the way to somewhere!
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

User avatar
Maximus
Legendary Member!
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: The Bush Capital (Canberra)

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#426 Post by Maximus » Tue Mar 29, 2011 1:31 pm

This from The Advertiser yesterday...
Extra Malaysia Airlines Adelaide flights start
From: The Advertiser * March 28, 2011 12:00AM

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 6029090912

MALAYSIA Airlines will make six direct flights from Kuala Lumpur to Adelaide every week.

The move will add 29,000 extra seats into South Australia each year.

Tourism Minister John Rau said the airline would begin increasing its number of flights from four to six this week.

Mr Rau said the 50 per cent increase built on the state's "growing performance in international tourism".

"Malaysia Airlines continues to show great confidence in South Australia and we look forward to continuing (to) work with them in the future," he said.
It's = it is; its = everything else.
You're = you are; your = belongs to.
Than = comparative ("bigger than"); then = next.

User avatar
rogue
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 659
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 8:45 am
Location: Over here

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#427 Post by rogue » Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:25 pm

From today..

Image

User avatar
bm7500
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 901
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:04 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#428 Post by bm7500 » Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:39 am

Thanks for the picture Rogue, but this update belongs in the New Control Tower Thread here: http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... 6&start=15
ADELAIDE SINGAPORE LONDON BERLIN AMSTERDAM PARIS TOKYO AUCKLAND DOHA DUBLIN HONG KONG BANGKOK REYKJAVIK ROME MADRID BUDAPEST COPENHAGEN ZURICH BRUSSELS VIENNA PRAGUE STOCKHOLM LUXEMBOURG BRATISLAVA NASSAU DUBAI BAHRAIN KUALA LUMPUR HELSINKI GENEVA

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#429 Post by metro » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:04 pm

According to a survey, London-Heathrow airport is the worlds worst, ranked 99th in a survey, Melbourne was ranked 4 spots behind Heathrow and Perth is Australia's worst being ranked far behind Melbourne.

Adelaide got 72nd place, and Sydney was the best in Australia with 67.

Best airports were Singapore, Seoul and Hong Kong

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/trave ... world.html

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2140
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#430 Post by Aidan » Thu Apr 07, 2011 1:44 pm

metro wrote:According to a survey, London-Heathrow airport is the worlds worst, ranked 99th in a survey, Melbourne was ranked 4 spots behind Heathrow and Perth is Australia's worst being ranked far behind Melbourne.

Adelaide got 72nd place, and Sydney was the best in Australia with 67.

Best airports were Singapore, Seoul and Hong Kong

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/trave ... world.html
The SMH coverage is slightly better, but I can't find a link to the list itself. Thus I don't know how the rankings were determined, but Sydney greatly outranking Melbourne suggests that accessibility is a major factor.

Rival airport reviewer Skytrax claims the results cast doubt over the validity of the process.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#431 Post by Ho Really » Thu Apr 07, 2011 8:49 pm

Saw a jet coming in to land on Wednesday (6th April) but couldn't make out the airline. Saw it from Norwood and it would have been over Gilberton or North Adelaide when I caught sight of it. It looked like it had a light blue tail and some other shade along the sides. This would have been around 11:00am. Checked the AAL website in the arvo but the webcam was stuck on one of the previous day's images. Also checked flights in and out, but it may have been too late. Anyone have any idea?

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#432 Post by metro » Thu Apr 07, 2011 9:56 pm

I also saw a plane could have been an A330? unpainted with no airline livery sitting on the tarmac down towards Harbourtown, was there for the whole time as i drove by. Wonder if it's the same plane Ho Really is talking about, i was driving past at about 11:30am on Wed.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#433 Post by Ho Really » Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:38 pm

Metro, was it unpainted? Maybe it was just shadow on the tail that I saw. Hard to say because I was working in the back garden and didn't have my glasses (which helps when viewing things at a distance). If it was a A330 it might be the new A330-200 ordered by Virgin Blue that will be used on the Sydney-Perth and Sydney-Melbourne routes from May 26th. I am only guessing though. Thanks for doing some plane spotting.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#434 Post by Ho Really » Thu Apr 07, 2011 11:58 pm

Aidan wrote:
metro wrote:According to a survey, London-Heathrow airport is the worlds worst, ranked 99th in a survey, Melbourne was ranked 4 spots behind Heathrow and Perth is Australia's worst being ranked far behind Melbourne.

Adelaide got 72nd place, and Sydney was the best in Australia with 67.

Best airports were Singapore, Seoul and Hong Kong

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/trave ... world.html
The SMH coverage is slightly better, but I can't find a link to the list itself. Thus I don't know how the rankings were determined, but Sydney greatly outranking Melbourne suggests that accessibility is a major factor.

Rival airport reviewer Skytrax claims the results cast doubt over the validity of the process.
I actually read the article in the SMH Traveller and some of the comments (and there were 185 of them). Adelaide was mentioned three times, by Melbournians.
Craig from Bayside wrote:
Melbourne Airport - There isn't even protection from the rain when you are dropping off - picking up. Little Adelaide airport is way ahead of Melbourne. Coming home to Melbourne Airport after traveling abroad is always embarrassing/depressing. The Asian airports listed are wonderful.
Nelson from Melbourne wrote:
The problem is there is no real vision or care factor by government and the private operators to improve our airports.

Forget comparing it to Singapore's Changi, Melbourne and Sydney can't even compete with Adelaide's new domestic terminal -- with free wifi, recharging stations, big open windows natural lighting etc.

We can all complain over and over again and nothing is done because at the end of the day, we all NEED to use the airport to travel, so i guess we have to suck it up and put up with it because we have no choice.

If I had to catch an international flight where i have to arrive 3 hours prior to departure, I eat at home because there is NO WAY I'm paying $7.99 for a ham & cheese sandwich, small bag 50g of chips $4.50 and $6.50 for a 350ml can of softdrink.

Melbourne's airport was fine 40 years ago but its getting very very old. The most innovative improvement they have done to Melbourne is installing those new dyson hand dryers - HAHAHA.

But the airport owners who read this blog now will laugh and go back to counting their $$$ because frankly they dont give a crap.

It's just embarrasing for us when international tourists visit our country and see what a hole our airports are. Great first impression!
Inner Westie from Melbourne wrote:
I flew back into Tulla last night from Adelaide and walking down the back stairs of plane and then back up stairs into terminal (what a joke), I thought - this place looks like something from the third world. It is tired, disorganised and has not been updated to reflect increase in passenger numbers. After paying $69 for 2 days parking in long term bay, I really did wonder where the privatised owners were spending their profits? Obviously, they are not. Surely there must be something in the sales contracts about maintaining certain standards? Adelaide was newer and generally more pleasant. However, the third world description really hits when you fly in from places such as Singapore!
Imagine our airport when we get the new car park up, the hotel and a light rail into the city. Like I said somewhere else, our airport is one of the few things we've built right in this city, something that hasn't been done at half measure (albeit cheaply but good) and that can be upgraded/expanded easily. Kudos to the fellas down at West Beach. Now what I want to see is you guys lobby the gov for that light rail asap. That will be the icing on the cake.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Adelaide Airport & Airline News

#435 Post by metro » Fri Apr 08, 2011 12:01 am

Ho Really, It was just white, unpainted. I'm not exactly sure it was an A330, was just my best guess.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot], VinyTapestry849 and 3 guests