[COM] Adelaide Oval Redevelopment
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
In my opinion, I think that the PAFC board's prediction that crowd attendances will increase significantly with the move to AO is a load of propaganda that was designed to win supporters over to back a development which the board knows will give them a better stadium return, which ultimately is the key to their financial success as a club. Arguments like "We don't like AAMI because it's a the Crows' homeground", and "Adelaide Oval is our spiritual homeground because we won a bunch of flags there in the 1950s" is the absolute biggest load of bull I have ever heard. Geographically speaking, AAMI is FAR closer to Port Adelaide than Adelaide (eventhough the crows represent a composite); basically the North Western burbs is real PA territory. Port have no link to AO, and i'll find it a little amusing when their attendances slump back to where they are today after the initial excitement of a new location wears off (but it wont matter as the club will be financially better off, and I dont care because i'm a crows fan and want footy in the city anyway )
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
I'm one of those non-Port living members, rhino, and I've been a member since Russell Ebert, Greg Boulton and Bucky Cunningham were playing.
I think Power membership is around 36,000 (Crows have over 50,000 - no-one knows why). There are a lot of Power members spread around the place, me included, but I worked in the Port for three years and it was obvious then and still is I think (although I've never seen a list of members' addresses) that the Port area has a high concentration of Port and therefore Power members. The Crows has no such area.
My point about players being locals no longer applies to Port's list, but I think it still applies to a lot of Power members who are also or were Port Magpie members.
I think Power membership is around 36,000 (Crows have over 50,000 - no-one knows why). There are a lot of Power members spread around the place, me included, but I worked in the Port for three years and it was obvious then and still is I think (although I've never seen a list of members' addresses) that the Port area has a high concentration of Port and therefore Power members. The Crows has no such area.
My point about players being locals no longer applies to Port's list, but I think it still applies to a lot of Power members who are also or were Port Magpie members.
I've wondered about that. Again, I have no figures, but there seem to be fewer pensioner Power fans at AAMI matches than there were a few years ago. This could be a false impression, or it could mean that Port is losing and not replacing its older fans. I don't go to many Magpies matches, so I can't say there.Rhino wrote: This seems to go against what the Club itself thinks. Numbers are dropping off at AAMI, and the club thinks they will do better at AO
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
Found this interesting....
http://www.austadiums.com/forum/viewtop ... &start=405
Stolen from hereAdelaide_United_Red wrote:Friday Night Blockbuster at the old Girl last night...Sturt moved their home game from suburban Unley Oval to AdOval and the results are a big WIN for FNF in the city IMO...
Sturt average home crowd for 2010: 3,849(SANFL site]
Last nights crowd: 7,049
scores:
Sturt…6-12-48
Nwd….19-12-126
Goals
Sturt…Crane, Duldig x 2, Stokes, Wingard
Nwd….Aish x 5, Eagleton x 4, Gallagher x 3, Persinos x 2, Terlich, Bown, Dawe, Bode, Rowe
**Young Jesse Aish had one of the best solo footy goals I've seen in the third quarter. took possession on the 50(members side), sold a couple of dummies, hand passed it to himself over a couple of Sturt players, then ran in and kicked the major from an acute angle at about 35 meters out. If you can find highlights, do yourselves a favour as Molly would say and check it out:)
Quarters
Sturt…2-4...3-7...3-10.….6-12-48
Nwd….4-3...7-6...13-10...19-12-126
I spoke to as many members as I could last night(about 10 of all ages and most were indicating that they were inclined to vote yes unless something out of the ordinary happened to change their mind. Definitely a case of younger members gung-ho for it, older ones happy to be more cautious.small sample size of course.
Interesting point from my observation, to a man they were convinced that the State govt would 'make it happen' regardless of the vote of 20,000 SACA members;)
Funnily enough, with no special trains/buses put on(its 'only SANFL) it did seem to me that most folks either parked in the city and walked down or were on the standard Friday night PT. AND of course those precious view of the Adelaide Hills mean Jack schit at niht;) but that's one more thing for the old fuddy duddies to bitch about that has no consequence to the end result .
http://www.austadiums.com/forum/viewtop ... &start=405
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
with the government proposing free PT for matches with a game ticket this will surely bring more pensionors back to the game won't it?stumpjumper wrote:I've wondered about that. Again, I have no figures, but there seem to be fewer pensioner Power fans at AAMI matches than there were a few years ago. This could be a false impression, or it could mean that Port is losing and not replacing its older fans. I don't go to many Magpies matches, so I can't say there.
Wouldn't $$ be the no1 reason for them not coming? Along with ease of access and comfort, all these things should be better at AO.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
I agree. That is interesting. Especially after all the hoohah, you'd expect better than two goals from Duldig.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
You're onto something flavze. After spending that much on the AO, it would be good to see however many seats remain after the various memberships have been accommodated, offered free (by ballot if necessary) to the non-member mug punters who have paid for it.
It would be a nice gesture, for a few weeks at least.
It would be a nice gesture, for a few weeks at least.
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
Just so I'm clear, are you suggesting that they would offer tickets to AFL matches for free?stumpjumper wrote:You're onto something flavze. After spending that much on the AO, it would be good to see however many seats remain after the various memberships have been accommodated, offered free (by ballot if necessary) to the non-member mug punters who have paid for it.
It would be a nice gesture, for a few weeks at least.
"The Beauty of Grace is that it makes life not fair." - Relient K
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
To be fair, who wants to watch the footy at Dog Crap Park?crawf wrote:Found this interesting....
Stolen from hereAdelaide_United_Red wrote:Friday Night Blockbuster at the old Girl last night...Sturt moved their home game from suburban Unley Oval to AdOval and the results are a big WIN for FNF in the city IMO...
Sturt average home crowd for 2010: 3,849(SANFL site]
Last nights crowd: 7,049
scores:
Sturt…6-12-48
Nwd….19-12-126
Goals
Sturt…Crane, Duldig x 2, Stokes, Wingard
Nwd….Aish x 5, Eagleton x 4, Gallagher x 3, Persinos x 2, Terlich, Bown, Dawe, Bode, Rowe
**Young Jesse Aish had one of the best solo footy goals I've seen in the third quarter. took possession on the 50(members side), sold a couple of dummies, hand passed it to himself over a couple of Sturt players, then ran in and kicked the major from an acute angle at about 35 meters out. If you can find highlights, do yourselves a favour as Molly would say and check it out:)
Quarters
Sturt…2-4...3-7...3-10.….6-12-48
Nwd….4-3...7-6...13-10...19-12-126
I spoke to as many members as I could last night(about 10 of all ages and most were indicating that they were inclined to vote yes unless something out of the ordinary happened to change their mind. Definitely a case of younger members gung-ho for it, older ones happy to be more cautious.small sample size of course.
Interesting point from my observation, to a man they were convinced that the State govt would 'make it happen' regardless of the vote of 20,000 SACA members;)
Funnily enough, with no special trains/buses put on(its 'only SANFL) it did seem to me that most folks either parked in the city and walked down or were on the standard Friday night PT. AND of course those precious view of the Adelaide Hills mean Jack schit at niht;) but that's one more thing for the old fuddy duddies to bitch about that has no consequence to the end result .
http://www.austadiums.com/forum/viewtop ... &start=405
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
thechap - it is a bit of a stretch, I admit, but considering what the AFL stands to gain (if the Centre for Economic Studies' projections are correct) it could be a great way of introducing the facility to the public, and it would be great to see the redevelopment start with a few full houses. It would be a good test of the facilities as well.
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
Are you serious?
It is more of a stretch... nothing is free in this world
It is more of a stretch... nothing is free in this world
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 10:10 pm
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
OK then - what about an open day, when no fixtures are scheduled? I'm thinking... free beer!
Seriously, it would be nice for non-SACA/footy members just to see what our $ have bought.
Seriously, it would be nice for non-SACA/footy members just to see what our $ have bought.
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
when the western stand was completed, non-saca memebrs got to sit in it for one day at a redbacks sheild game IIRC, free tickets on the other hand, are highly unlikely. I dont think they would have any issues selling the thing out in the first contest, especially if it's a showdown.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 522
- Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2008 9:32 pm
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
I think the last time free beer was given out was when a guy was trying to get people to see his singing frog.stumpjumper wrote:OK then - what about an open day, when no fixtures are scheduled? I'm thinking... free beer!
-
- Banned
- Posts: 504
- Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 4:47 pm
[COM] Re: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment Thread - Now Includes Poll!
i like this ideastumpjumper wrote:OK then - what about an open day, when no fixtures are scheduled? I'm thinking... free beer!
Seriously, it would be nice for non-SACA/footy members just to see what our $ have bought.
If 50 million believe in a fallacy, it is still a fallacy..." Professor S.W. Carey
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], whatstheirnamesmom and 7 guests