[COM] Oaklands Crossing | $174m
[COM] Re: #COM: Oaklands Park Interchange
I'm thinking that the fixed vertical info booth that norman photoed above is going to be some sort of digital lcd display. Its got a tough grille over it, but the reason why i think this is because they seem to have waited for the security cameras to go up before actually setting it up.
- Düsseldorfer
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:52 am
[COM] Re: #COM: Oaklands Park Interchange
wow that box is pretty low for an LCD display...and i'm just wondering why they would have another 4-8 LCD screens installed when they already have 8 RRT displaysmuzzamo wrote:I'm thinking that the fixed vertical info booth that norman photoed above is going to be some sort of digital lcd display. Its got a tough grille over it, but the reason why i think this is because they seem to have waited for the security cameras to go up before actually setting it up.
[COM] Re: #COM: Oaklands Park Interchange
Good question. Its just a hunch, otherwise why wouldn't they have already set it up? Maybe it could be used for transadelaide info messages like the ones in Adelaide Railway station? Its certainly a heavy duty box, and the size of the grille would mean that you couldn't use it for normal timetables.Düsseldorfer wrote:wow that box is pretty low for an LCD display...and i'm just wondering why they would have another 4-8 LCD screens installed when they already have 8 RRT displays
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: #COM: Oaklands Park Interchange
Perhaps (and this is just throwing it out there to see if the cat will lick it up) the grille is for mounting things upon and not behind?muzzamo wrote:Good question. Its just a hunch, otherwise why wouldn't they have already set it up? Maybe it could be used for transadelaide info messages like the ones in Adelaide Railway station? Its certainly a heavy duty box, and the size of the grille would mean that you couldn't use it for normal timetables.Düsseldorfer wrote:wow that box is pretty low for an LCD display...and i'm just wondering why they would have another 4-8 LCD screens installed when they already have 8 RRT displays
Geeze, the whole place looks like some giant beached whale carcass ... OF THE FUTURE!
>> Rail Real Time "On Track" << TM (C) AdelaideMetro
WHY do they have to brand EVERYTHING? It's just a friigin' information board FFS. It doesn't need a brand identity.
Anyway the station is one thousand times better than the worn out 1950s things we mostly have.
>> A move in the right direction! << TM (C) Mono.
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
-
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 537
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 9:13 pm
[COM] Re: #COM: Oaklands Park Interchange
I mostly agree, but having stood on that platform on a 21 degree day, at 2pm and being blasted with cold breezes, I have to say this station just doesn't do a good job at sheltering humans. I hate to think what its like at night time, or when its raining.monotonehell wrote: Anyway the station is one thousand times better than the worn out 1950s things we mostly have.
>> A move in the right direction! << TM (C) Mono.
I do hope Port Adelaide gets rebuilt real soon, the 1950s version of that was impressive. The current shell of a station is an eyesore and looks to be made from scrap yard timber and parts.
AdelaideNow: Now with 300% more Liberal Party hacks, at no extra cost.
- Düsseldorfer
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 288
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 3:52 am
[COM] Re: #COM: Oaklands Park Interchange
I think with Oaklands some transperant wind shelters could be easilly built on the platforms, maybe even a waiting room on one or both of the platforms...fabricator wrote:I mostly agree, but having stood on that platform on a 21 degree day, at 2pm and being blasted with cold breezes, I have to say this station just doesn't do a good job at sheltering humans. I hate to think what its like at night time, or when its raining.
I do hope Port Adelaide gets rebuilt real soon, the 1950s version of that was impressive. The current shell of a station is an eyesore and looks to be made from scrap yard timber and parts.
and with Port Adelaide station, that elevated station in it's current condition is such an eye-sore. IMO it should become an underground/sunken station and at ground level it could be a sort of public space/bus interchange with a tram stop (if/when the tram is built).
[COM] Re: Oaklands rail crossing
$2m study into Morphett Rd rail under/overpass
Guardian Messenger
Local News
1 Jul 11 @ 10:59am by Kane McKay
THE State Government will this month begin a study into the feasibility of building a rail overpass or underpass at Morphett Rd.
The $2 million study will also look at ways of easing traffic congestion around the Oaklands Park Railway Station, with the findings expected to be available by June 2013.
A spokeswoman for the Transport Department said the study would attempt to determine the impact of recent developments in the area.
“The study will take into account the implications of a number of recent developments, including increased traffic generated by the State Aquatic Centre and redevelopment of the Marion Domain,” the spokeswoman said.
“Other factors include the introduction of a 30-year plan for greater Adelaide, and a planned increase in rail services following the extension of this line to Seaford”.
- notmichaeljfox
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:16 pm
[COM] Re: #PRO: Oaklands Rail Underpass
A bit late isn't it? Wouldn't this have been better when they rebuilt the station?
[COM] Re: #PRO: Oaklands Rail Underpass
They built the Oaklands rail station with the provision in mind that it wouldn't be affected by any future construction works caused by the construction of an under/overpass adjacent.notmichaeljfox wrote:A bit late isn't it? Wouldn't this have been better when they rebuilt the station?
Don't worry.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[COM] Re: #PRO: Oaklands Rail Underpass
This would be a good candidate for Fed Govt funding (Infrastructure Australia). Should not be difficult to justify.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 354
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm
[COM] Re: #PRO: Oaklands Rail Underpass
They arent going to underground the station so what matter does it have if they build an road overpass or underpass next to it. The rail line will still be at ground level.
[COM] Re: #PRO: Oaklands Rail Underpass
I believe they will be elevating the railway and raising the station. Something I heard on the radio yesterday morning.
cheers,
Rhino
Rhino
[COM] Re: #PRO: Oaklands Rail Underpass
Bullshit.rhino wrote:I believe they will be elevating the railway and raising the station. Something I heard on the radio yesterday morning.
There is no way that they would have built the Oaklands station, less than 5 years old, to rebuild it again.
Not to mention, they have just resleepered the Noarlunga Line through the station. Again, why all the time and effort, only to rip it up again?
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[COM] Re: #PRO: Oaklands Rail Underpass
doubt they'd demolish the station, most likely it will be a road bridge over the tracks, is the cheapest option and could be built very fast with minimal disruption. Also gives the station an overpass, all they need to add is stairs and lifts.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 1 guest