[COM] Uno Apartments | 53m | 17lvls | Residential
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
Why would they want people to know they designed this %$#* monstrosity.
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
Looking at those photos, it makes you wonder what sort of hallucinogenic drugs these development panels that approve developments are on, when you take into consideration some of the excellent proposals that get knocked back or forced to be watered down.
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
I await to pass judgement until completion...
Sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken
[COM] Re:
I must have psychic abilities. I wrote this in 2006!Will wrote:I am actually not very happy about this development. 100 Waymouth Street or the Workcover building is in my opinion one of the most attractive buildings in the CBD, and I feel this development will block the building with a boring/ ugly concrete wall. As the proposed apartment is for homeless and poor people then I can only imagine what kind of soviet style cheap looking monolith will be erected on the site.
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
I thought at the time that the renders on page 8 looked ok, but real life is rather disappointing! It actually looks like cheap social welfare housing which I doubt was the original intention!
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
I had been reserving judgement, hoping the paintwork might help matters. It doesn't.
What a way to shit on Waymouth Street's revival.
What a way to shit on Waymouth Street's revival.
Keep Adelaide Weird
- Xaragmata
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 2:08 pm
- Location: Adelaide / West
- Contact:
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
Some pics from Monday - the raw concrete looks better than the painted finish (?)
It might have looked better if the 7 level section had been built to the full height to mask the blank concrete (?)
It might have looked better if the 7 level section had been built to the full height to mask the blank concrete (?)
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
What's even more offensive about this building is that it's right beside the Queen's Theatre. The new worst beside the oldest best.
Keep Adelaide Weird
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
I suspect this is only the first coat, but even still...
[COM] Re: #PRO: Kings Apartments | 68m | 26lvls | Residential
Would have been nicer.Howie wrote:Keep in mind these elevations are a couple years old, so it may be a totally different proposal by now.
Here's one from around that time, courtesy of AL.
[COM] U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
I'm sorry but this building is Architecture's suicide note.
[COM] Re: U/C: Uno Apartments | 16lvls | Residential
Dreadful concept, dreadful execution. Make it go away.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests