20-22 Currie St | 123m | 31lvls | Office

Message

#16 Post by **Pikey** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:33 pm

Will wrote:
Pikey wrote:Where's Will when you need him!
This is marvellous news!

I apologize that I have not been able to keep people up to date recently, but I have had huge amounts of uni work, and also I have my cousin's wedding next week and my grandma is currently in hospital. If I have time in the next few days I'll see if I can get more detailed information.

It's all good - we just usually hear about this kind of stuff from your first!

#17 Post by **Howie** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:35 pm

The plot is indeed slim, but it goes pretty deep.

How about trying to lobby the civil aviation authority? Maybe we should call Amanda Blair on this one.

aussie2000 · #18 Post by **aussie2000** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:35 pm

this is so cool, i hope it gets built and maybe adelaide will have a proper city observation deck, forget about santos!!!!

#19 Post by **Ben** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:36 pm

Howie wrote: How about trying to lobby the civil aviation authority? Maybe we should call Amanda Blair on this one.

That is a great idea!

Pistol · #20 Post by **Pistol** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:38 pm

168m for a 31 storey is TALL! Can't believe Adelaide might be getting new tallest. Just have to hope that AAL approve or its crash and burn!

#21 Post by **Ben** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:40 pm

We have had a 200m building approved before so i'm thinking positive about this.

#22 Post by **Howie** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:43 pm

beamer85 wrote:
Howie wrote: How about trying to lobby the civil aviation authority? Maybe we should call Amanda Blair on this one.
That is a great idea!

Well i've emailed Amanda on this one, this could be the first real test for her Greater Adelaide party. Enough time for rhetoric, we'd like to see action

#23 Post by **Pikey** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:43 pm

Not saying glass is half empty, but try not to get your hopes too high just yet

#24 Post by **Howie** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:46 pm

Well it's better to be proactive rather than reactive. Let's not have nimby's get in the way once again.

#25 Post by **Pikey** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:49 pm

Better still, get the Government involved and give this major project status.

#26 Post by **Ben** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:51 pm

I assume this building will house Transport SA so the Governement will definately be keen to see this approved.

#27 Post by **Howie** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 1:52 pm

Pikey wrote:Better still, get the Government involved and give this major project status.

Awesome.. who would we email? Capital City Committee you think?

#28 Post by **Pikey** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:05 pm

I'd say so.

I'd dare say they already know about it. (Al)

#29 Post by **Howie** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:06 pm

Well i fired off an email to them anyhow

aussie2000 · #30 Post by **aussie2000** » Wed Apr 11, 2007 2:23 pm

so is it one tower or are they twin towers

[CAN] 20-22 Currie St | 123m | 31lvls | Office

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

[CAN]

Who is online