News & Discussion: Adelaide Metro Trains

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
muzzamo
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1029
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 4:44 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1171 Post by muzzamo » Mon Sep 13, 2010 7:12 pm

Isiskii wrote:2. They are considering converting the route to light rail (ala Glenelg tramway).
Thats the first I have heard of this. Source?

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6485
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1172 Post by Norman » Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:35 pm

Isiskii wrote:1. Pending the outcome of the Hills Frieght Rail Study.
That's already been completed and the proposals rejected, the freight trains are going to stay for some time yet.

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2148
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1173 Post by Aidan » Tue Sep 14, 2010 1:59 am

Norman wrote:
Isiskii wrote:1. Pending the outcome of the Hills Frieght Rail Study.
That's already been completed and the proposals rejected, the freight trains are going to stay for some time yet.
I had a look at the study report and am unimpressed. Some of the assumptions their figures are based on are actually contradicted by the text of the report!. For example, figure 14 is inconsistent with section 7.1.1. Assumptions regarding growth are based on historical averages and seem to be rather pessimistic. And the treatment of noise does not even appear to comply with the terms of reference.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

ozisnowman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1174 Post by ozisnowman » Mon Sep 20, 2010 2:37 pm

Wonder if the government slashing the budget had anything to do with this outcome. Would like to know
if GHD factored into this study the supposed increase in Hills Population for example Mount Barker etc
which will be affected as are current residence. I live a fair distence from the Eden Hills station and
you can always here the goods trains would hate to be one of those living a lot closer.

Its time the SA government hassle the Federal Government about getting the tunnels fixed and allowing
duplication of the Belair Line up to Mount Barker, because it will be needed.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1175 Post by rhino » Mon Sep 20, 2010 3:02 pm

ozisnowman wrote:Its time the SA government hassle the Federal Government about getting the tunnels fixed and allowing
duplication of the Belair Line up to Mount Barker, because it will be needed.
Which goes to show how much you don't know about commuting on public transport. Check the routes of train vs express bus. 90mins vs 45mins. Nuff said.
cheers,
Rhino

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3783
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1176 Post by Waewick » Mon Sep 20, 2010 3:15 pm

what would it be like with an express train do you tihnk?

(question only - not loaded)

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1177 Post by rhino » Mon Sep 20, 2010 3:30 pm

Still has to go via Blackwood and avoid any all-stoppers in front of it. Then it stops on North Tce. Compare this to an express bus down the freeway - 5 minute headways if it's warranted. Drops you off in Hindmarsh Square or on Grenfell or Currie street. The only slow point is Glen Osmond Road. I regularly bus in from Crafers, and G.O. Road has never been a problem.
cheers,
Rhino

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3783
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1178 Post by Waewick » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:01 pm

ah fair enough.

I can't say i've ever taken a train in Adelaide before.

I would have thought for those longer distances trains would be better than buses. But I guess that kind of sums up our passenger rail services in this state really (that is not an attack on Labor btw)

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6485
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1179 Post by Norman » Mon Sep 20, 2010 5:31 pm

capitalist wrote:ah fair enough.

I can't say i've ever taken a train in Adelaide before.

I would have thought for those longer distances trains would be better than buses. But I guess that kind of sums up our passenger rail services in this state really (that is not an attack on Labor btw)
It's not so much the trains themselves, it's more the gradient and the path of the actual line the train has to follow.

ozisnowman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1180 Post by ozisnowman » Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:21 pm

You are making the comparison between express bus and current diesel train and current single track.
What would be the difference if the tunnels were fixed and electrified with tilt train rolling stock
capable of doing 160km/hr? Also one has to consider the benefits of electrified rail with lower
emissions, reduced congestion of city streets especially during peak hour. I have driven through
town at peak hour to pick up my wife and the buses are a nightmare...

User avatar
AG
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 2099
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:44 am
Location: Adelaide SA

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1181 Post by AG » Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:58 pm

ozisnowman wrote:You are making the comparison between express bus and current diesel train and current single track.
What would be the difference if the tunnels were fixed and electrified with tilt train rolling stock
capable of doing 160km/hr? Also one has to consider the benefits of electrified rail with lower
emissions, reduced congestion of city streets especially during peak hour. I have driven through
town at peak hour to pick up my wife and the buses are a nightmare...
That's assuming the freight trains that currently use the corridor can magically disappear elsewhere. The whole issue of upgrading the Hills Line is a bit more technically challenging than just whacking up some wires and getting new trains (it's possible of course!). Those issues include the two tracks for interstate and local trains being different gauges, the local trains dealing with a single track and passing loops which makes timetabling important and the restricting heights within at least one of the tunnels along the route.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1182 Post by metro » Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:53 pm

Trains between Mawson Lakes and the City return on october 4

http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/RR/ ... talisation

ozisnowman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1183 Post by ozisnowman » Wed Sep 22, 2010 2:58 pm

AG wrote:
ozisnowman wrote:You are making the comparison between express bus and current diesel train and current single track.
What would be the difference if the tunnels were fixed and electrified with tilt train rolling stock
capable of doing 160km/hr? Also one has to consider the benefits of electrified rail with lower
emissions, reduced congestion of city streets especially during peak hour. I have driven through
town at peak hour to pick up my wife and the buses are a nightmare...
That's assuming the freight trains that currently use the corridor can magically disappear elsewhere. The whole issue of upgrading the Hills Line is a bit more technically challenging than just whacking up some wires and getting new trains (it's possible of course!). Those issues include the two tracks for interstate and local trains being different gauges, the local trains dealing with a single track and passing loops which makes timetabling important and the restricting heights within at least one of the tunnels along the route.
They should be standardising the rail line as part of the electrification on all lines. That would allow them to utilise the other hills line when not in use. With modern switching technology, gps tracking etc i cant see why it would be too difficult. With new diesel electric hybrids they could then use diesel say between mitcham and blackwood and and electric elsewhere. The line should be extended to Mount Barker at least if not Murray Bridge. The sections after say Stirling could be electrified. That way you could use diesel through the tunnels and not have electric wires and supports affecting the goods trains.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1184 Post by rhino » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:20 am

ozisnowman wrote:
They should be standardising the rail line as part of the electrification on all lines. That would allow them to utilise the other hills line when not in use. .
Except that the other line is owned by someone else with a different agenda. The current standard guage line is owned by ARTC (Australian Rail Track Corporation) and is there to facilitate inter-capital freight, which is somewhat at odds with commuter transport.

Also, can you imagine a tilt train trying to negotiate our Hills line at any sort of fast pace? There are way too many twists and turns, level crossings, etc, to negotiate, not to mention all-stoppers in front of it. Fixable? yes, but at what cost, and will that be worth it in the end? (Will you get value for money?) I doubt it.
cheers,
Rhino

ozisnowman
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 12:34 pm

Re: Electrification and Resleepering of TransAdelaide Networ

#1185 Post by ozisnowman » Mon Sep 27, 2010 9:45 am

Is it worth the cost? depends what you compare it against! What about a Desalination Plant that we will be paying through the
nose for even though it most likely will see little use. Just hope with the Desalination Plant that they actually use it
and leave more water for environmental flows in our catchments such as the Para, Torrens and Onkaparinga Rivers.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 2 guests