Page 9 of 11

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:26 pm
by Nathan
Ben wrote:I hope the arbour is not finished because it looks horrible!! looks like someone has crushed up a few 1970's hills hoists and stuck them up on the side of the carpark.
Clearly it's not finished until it's covered with vines — bare metal frames aren't the intended look.

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 2:42 pm
by jk1237
Interesting I must say. If the sun actually comes back in summer, it may grow quicker

[COM] PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:48 pm
by Matt
Photo please? :)

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2012 10:02 pm
by AdelaideAlive
Nathan wrote:
Ben wrote:I hope the arbour is not finished because it looks horrible!! looks like someone has crushed up a few 1970's hills hoists and stuck them up on the side of the carpark.
Clearly it's not finished until it's covered with vines — bare metal frames aren't the intended look.
saw it today ,hope your right very stunning and not in a good way :shock:

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:39 pm
by omada
Photo's please!! I can't bag the ACC without evidence.

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 12:44 pm
by Waewick
can confirm it looks very very ugly.

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2012 1:28 pm
by AdelaideAlive
gold plated emblem things on bottom help,but wow $30,000 for that? i could of done that for $3000 max i reckon, including installation :lol: lol

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:58 pm
by SRW
Meh. I walked by today and the arbour section is tiny relative to the structure, and not nearly as ugly. Barely noticeable and will be covered with greenery soon enough anyway.

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 11:43 pm
by Matt
Would appreciate if someone can grab a quick happy snap on their phone next time they're wandering past? Cheers.

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:52 pm
by Plasmatron
Almost forgot, I took a few photos recently (last week).

Image
Image

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:56 pm
by AdelaideAlive
SRW wrote:Meh. I walked by today and the arbour section is tiny relative to the structure, and not nearly as ugly. Barely noticeable and will be covered with greenery soon enough anyway.
glad your optimistic ,looks like afuturistic bike rack lol that thing wont be covered for at least 2 yrs with vines by my estimations :hilarious:

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 12:59 pm
by Ben
How can they justify $35,000 on that??? No wonder the council have no money to finish anything properly!! I could have done it for $500

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 2:18 pm
by SRW
AdelaideAlive wrote:
SRW wrote:Meh. I walked by today and the arbour section is tiny relative to the structure, and not nearly as ugly. Barely noticeable and will be covered with greenery soon enough anyway.
glad your optimistic ,looks like afuturistic bike rack lol that thing wont be covered for at least 2 yrs with vines by my estimations :hilarious:
Come next Spring, you'll all be wondering what the brouhaha was about.

Saying that, I also can't fathom how it amounted to $35,000. C'mon ACC, those pennies are precious!

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 6:15 pm
by [Shuz]
Ben wrote:How can they justify $35,000 on that??? No wonder the council have no money to finish anything properly!! I could have done it for $500
I could've done it for free!

[COM] Re: PRO: Rundle Street Upgrade

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 6:34 pm
by Pants
I'll wait to pass judgment until the vines are up, but one thing that won't change and it's synonymous with a lot of art and design, including building, in Adelaide, is that whatever the sculptures are at the bases of the steel work, they miss the mark. They have no reference point to the rest of the structure, are too awkward and messy to be contemporary and not intricate enough to be the opposite.

It's like a lot of the ACC-driven street art that's around the place and a lot of their splash Adelaide initiatives, they just miss the mark of being contemporary or alternatively, a good kind of retro and look thrown together, but at the same time, inorganic.