Re: #Official Mining Thread
Posted: Thu Sep 27, 2012 8:26 am
We all knew this was coming. 46 month extension request. Just hope the Govt gets a decent interim spend commitment (in SA for the benefit of SA) from BHP, not just their own spend on getting their new 'heap leaching' technology right. Also maybe an increase on royalty payments once ODX finally expands. Oh, and a new office tower please - 40 storeys will suffice
BHP Billiton promise puts SA Government in hot seat
BHP BILLITON has promised to spend hundreds of millions of dollars over four years to get its planning right for its Olympic Dam mine expansion.
The mining giant yesterday formally asked the State Government to grant an extension to the agreement covering the expansion.
That puts pressure on the Government again to clear the way for BHP despite being hurt by the "disappointing" decision last month to defer the project indefinitely.
Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Tom Koutsantonis said the request meant BHP was serious about staying in South Australia and developing that mine.
"What they are debating is how they will do that and how much it will cost," he said.
"What you are seeing is BHP saying they have very deep roots in SA."
The indenture agreement, which was ratified by Parliament last year, is due to expire on December 15.
BHP last month said it would not meet the deadline as the capital costs were too high and it was going back to the drawing board to work out a more cost-effective system of expanding the copper, gold and uranium mine near Roxby Downs.
Yesterday, BHP asked for an extension to October 2016 - the first time a target date has been announced for completing the revised plans.
The date coincides with the expiration of federal approvals and Mr Koutsantonis said BHP had told him they were confident of being ready to go back to the BHP Billiton board by then.
Mr Koutsantonis and officials from the premier's office - but not Premier Jay Weatherill himself - met BHP's head of operations in SA, Dean Dalla Valle.
After the August deferral, Mr Weatherill said if BHP wanted an extension, it would need to seek permission from the community, which would be "very wary" of the miner because it had disappointed SA.
Yesterday, he took a more conciliatory approach.
"Although we remain disappointed by BHP's decision to put off the expansion, this confirms the company is committed to the project in the longer term," he said.
Mr Koutsantonis said the Government would take BHP's request seriously and give it due diligence.
"I won't make any comment about whether we will accept that request or not other to say I'll be carefully considering it," he said.
BHP had told him they expected to spend hundreds of millions of dollars advancing the project which would involve extracting the minerals by leaching them out of crushed ore.
This would be similar to, but more complex than, the systems used at BHP mines in Chile.
Mr Koutsantonis has authority to sign off an extension on his own, subject to it appearing in the parliamentary papers for 10 sitting days, when a move could be made to disallow it.
However, he said, he would consult Cabinet, the Opposition Leader and the Opposition resources spokesman as well as seeking crown law advice.
He may choose to take an extension request back to parliamentary debate or decide existing approvals are adequate and simply grant an extension.
In August, BHP cut back its design team from 190 to 50.
Mr Koutsantonis said much of the new work would involve university researchers rather than BHP employees directly.
BHP does not comment on financial projections for projects it has not approved.
However, BHP vice-president of external affairs Kym Winter-Dewhirst said it had given the minister an overview of how the project would proceed.
"The 46-month timing of the request is because we need to complete trials of heap-leach technology," he said.
BHP Billiton spent hundreds of millions of dollars and more than five years on environmental impact statements relating to the potential expansion of Olympic Dam.
In October, 2011, the expansion was awarded state and federal development approval with stringent conditions. In December that year the Indenture Act - an Act of state Parliament - ratified the approvals, but had a strict one year timeline for BHP to approve the new mine.
In August BHP announced the expansion would be indefinitely delayed.
WHY THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SAY YES
Extending the current Indenture Act will save millions of dollars and shave years off any potential expansion which might still go ahead.
WHY THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SAY NO
BHP has indicated it is looking at a vastly different mining proposal, which might have very different environmental impacts.
THE POLITICS
If Labor says yes - without securing new guarantees - they'll be portrayed as a weak party which is at the mercy of BHP. If they say no they'll be labelled "anti-development".