Sensational-Adelaide.com

Wayno wrote:Heard today of a new proposal in the works. New building comprised of offices, retail & supermarket behind the Newmarket Hotel on corner of Rose/Newmarket streets. No idea of height yet, but involves demolishing the existing chemist & pool hall buildings, and includes a pedestrian tunnel under North Tce across to the new RAH site.

Lochie1 wrote:

Wayno wrote:Heard today of a new proposal in the works. New building comprised of offices, retail & supermarket behind the Newmarket Hotel on corner of Rose/Newmarket streets. No idea of height yet, but involves demolishing the existing chemist & pool hall buildings, and includes a pedestrian tunnel under North Tce across to the new RAH site.

bump

Any new info on this development?

Shahkar wrote:What's the point of a pedestrian tunnel when you have a tram?

BUILDING across city streets to create new plazas and shared zones for walkers, cyclists and shops is part of a bold vision to transform Adelaide from a car-friendly grid into a pedestrian haven.

City-based architect Richard Samulis' says the CBD can increase its population by building "horizontally as well as vertically" through "a radical rethink of use of the street grid". Mr Samulis has pitched his manifesto to City Council staff and the State Government, which has referred it to the Office of Design and Architecture for consideration.

The plan includes:

EXTENDING building frontages and allowing new buildings in the middle of "wide and little-used" streets to create "semi-enclosed pedestrian plazas";

BANNING through-traffic from those streets and slowing vehicles accessing shops and homes to walking speed;

CREATING "walk-under" areas for shade and social use by elevating new buildings;

RESURFACING shared zones with "beautiful materials" such as cobblestones "to remove the distinction between street and footpath", and;

ENCOURAGING hole-in-the-wall bars, cafes, and shops in the shared zones and adding fountains, sculptures and street furniture.

The City Council has welcomed Mr Samulis' vision but says it presents significant economic and legislative challenges.

Mr Samulis nominated Frome and Flinders streets as prime candidates for his plan because they took little traffic outside peak times.

He said his plan would address Adelaide's lack of "surprising spaces", make the city a more appealing place to live in, and help absorb population growth without the need for highrises in residential areas.

"You could walk a long way from block to block without worrying about traffic and it starts to change the character of the city," he said.

Mr Samulis said the plan was a radical proposition for a conservative city, but pointed to the upcoming upgrade of Hindley St outside UniSA, creating a shared zone for pedestrians and cars, as a modest test case.

He said motorists would likely baulk at his plan and conceded it could not be implemented widely without major public transport improvements, including underground rail in the longer term.

Formerly a London-based computer engineer and account manager for software companies, Mr Samulis returned to his native Adelaide in 2005.

He qualified as an architect in 2009 and launched his own practice last year. His plan can be found on his blog: provocate.com.au.

Wayno wrote:The above proposal (e.g. building over streets) could be a source of additional income for the ACC. Effectively selling 'air rights' to developers. Thoughts?

metro wrote:

Wayno wrote:The above proposal (e.g. building over streets) could be a source of additional income for the ACC. Effectively selling 'air rights' to developers. Thoughts?

it's been done already in Adelaide, and it isn't pretty..

monotonehell wrote: With a different outcome in mind however, the designs would be different.
For example requireing streetfront activation, landscaping, lighting and sunlight requirments.

Mants wrote: how can a building which is suspended over the road have streetfront activation?

Mants wrote:

monotonehell wrote: With a different outcome in mind however, the designs would be different.
For example requireing streetfront activation, landscaping, lighting and sunlight requirments.

how can a building which is suspended over the road have streetfront activation?

Aidan wrote:

Mants wrote: how can a building which is suspended over the road have streetfront activation?

A good example is Wood Green Shopping City, in London's northern suburbs