#Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

Anything goes here.. :) Now with Beer Garden for our smoking patrons.
Message
Author
teflon fox
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:23 am

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#16 Post by teflon fox » Wed Jan 16, 2008 7:42 pm

Howie wrote:
PhilM wrote: Unless you call an undersized tram to nowhere that keeps braking down an achievement? Oh there is that 30 metre tunnel they just opened. Whoopi, we are living in an era of unprecedented Government wealth yet the less fortunate in society are being trodden into the ground and their stories hidden under spin.
You really need to get a clue.

Every post you make ends up in a shit fight. How about a 24 hour ban to cool you down?
Please do - The repetitive themes in all the threads are becomming quite boring

JusticeDenied
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#17 Post by JusticeDenied » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:30 pm

Lets see if anyone has the courage to ask why PhilM was blocked and his opinions banned?
Banned - please take caution in dealing with this member

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#18 Post by crawf » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:31 pm

PhilM wrote:Unless you call an undersized tram to nowhere that keeps braking down an achievement? Oh there is that 30 metre tunnel they just opened. Whoopi, we are living in an era of unprecedented Government wealth yet the less fortunate in society are being trodden into the ground and their stories hidden under spin.
:roll:

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#19 Post by crawf » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:33 pm

JusticeDenied/PhilM wrote:Lets see if anyone has the courage to ask why PhilM was blocked and his opinions banned?
Oh gawd

JusticeDenied
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:11 pm

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#20 Post by JusticeDenied » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:38 pm

I did, and this is the mature, thought out response I got, must be indicative of the level of the forum.


Have a cry.. :) That's what you're good at anyway.
Banned - please take caution in dealing with this member

User avatar
Howie
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4877
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#21 Post by Howie » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:40 pm

JusticeDenied wrote:Lets see if anyone has the courage to ask why PhilM was blocked and his opinions banned?
Because of the immature email he just sent the webmaster, has turned a 24 hour ban into a week ban. Once more it's permanent by ip and email. Have a good day.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#22 Post by rev » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:41 pm

JusticeDenied wrote:Lets see if anyone has the courage to ask why PhilM was blocked and his opinions banned?
His...no wait, your opinions, are not banned, they are still here. You, with your PhilM account, are banned for stirring trouble in an otherwise peaceful, civilised, fun and welcoming online community.
Your central pre-occupation on here has been to white wash thread after thread with anti-Labor/government nonsense.
Now, more people might take you seriously, if you weren't a Liberal party lacky, if you were unbiased in your criticism like a lot of people here are(criticising both sides of politics and so on). But you are neither.

User avatar
Howie
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4877
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 3:55 pm
Location: Adelaide
Contact:

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#23 Post by Howie » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:45 pm

Don't worry about PhilM, he just needs time to grow up and needs to learn how to get along with people in a civilised online community. Hopefully he'll learn one day.

rev
SA MVP (Most Valued Poster 4000+)
Posts: 6455
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 12:14 pm

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#24 Post by rev » Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:53 pm

Anyway back on topic now guys, I don't think Rann will stay as premier or leader of the Labor party(if they fall into opposition), for the next decade.
I reckon people will get sick of him, not necessarily due to screw ups or bad policies, but just wanting a change, similar to federally with Howard. I can see him stepping down as premier one day, taking a back bench seat or filling a spot in the Cabinet, and handing the reigns over to his deputy if public opinion(of him) starts to slide.

User avatar
SRW
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 3661
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
Location: Glenelg

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#25 Post by SRW » Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:43 am

I had expected an announcement to made about his retirement plans. It is quite an unsual thing to do, and something I don't think is really necessary (especially when you consider that it's just a statement of his (now) intentions). However, insofar as it sends the message that Rann is not addicted to power but rather in it for the service of South Australia, it's a positive annoucement.
rev wrote:Anyway back on topic now guys, I don't think Rann will stay as premier or leader of the Labor party(if they fall into opposition), for the next decade.
I reckon people will get sick of him, not necessarily due to screw ups or bad policies, but just wanting a change, similar to federally with Howard. I can see him stepping down as premier one day, taking a back bench seat or filling a spot in the Cabinet, and handing the reigns over to his deputy if public opinion(of him) starts to slide.
Oh gosh, I shudder at the thought of a Premier Foley...
Keep Adelaide Weird

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#26 Post by crawf » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:29 pm

As much as I'm state labor fan atm (especially Rann), if Folley took charge I would seriously consider voting Liberal next election.

The way he has gone about a few things such as the Victoria Park sage is just totally inappropriate and there is something about him I have never liked.

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#27 Post by Cruise » Thu Jan 17, 2008 2:54 pm

crawf wrote:As much as I'm state labor fan atm (especially Rann), if Folley took charge I would seriously consider voting Liberal next election.

The way he has gone about a few things such as the Victoria Park sage is just totally inappropriate and there is something about him I have never liked.
Yes voting liberal would be a great move, they like to tackle all the big problems like foxtel ads and city smoking bans and trivial shit like that.

And have you noticed all they do is whine about the rann government but have never pledged to change anything when/if they come into power?

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#28 Post by crawf » Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:02 pm

I just do not like Folley.

Anyway Rann is staying, so its more than likely I'll be voting Labor (if Im still in SA by then) unless Liberal start acting like a serious opposition and propose some major projects and services for Adelaide and SA.

Will
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5869
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#29 Post by Will » Thu Jan 17, 2008 9:45 pm

crawf wrote:I just do not like Folley.

Anyway Rann is staying, so its more than likely I'll be voting Labor (if Im still in SA by then) unless Liberal start acting like a serious opposition and propose some major projects and services for Adelaide and SA.
I don't think, Foley will ever be premier. My bet is that when Mike retires, Jay Weatherill will be premier.

teflon fox
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 11:23 am

Re: #Article: Rann to retire in 10 years.

#30 Post by teflon fox » Thu Jan 17, 2008 10:53 pm

My mail is Mike is very happy in his position. Whether he is still here in 10 years as the premier is up for discussion
but don't expect a change whilst this city is about to go boom in a big way.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest