Page 2 of 36
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:03 pm
by Howie
Done wrote:It would be better if there wasn't as many old people on the beach
What do you consider old? And why wouldn't you want them there? Glenelg's a place for everyone to enjoy - not just kids with too much time on their hands.
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 4:47 pm
by Mants
Done wrote:the beach is horible at Gleneg there is seaweed everywhere we couldnt go in the water the council needs to fix that problem.
are you educated or do you just want to completely fuck up the ecosystem?
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 6:24 pm
by AG
I'd be more worried about the environmental effects than the social part. The development has made Glenelg into a great tourist spot, amongst both Adelaideans and those from interstate and overseas. But by looking around the development site, there will be some serious environmental issues within a few decades.
With rising sea levels, some parts of the site may flood during high tide, particularly the below ground carparks immediately behind the beach.
Also concerning is the uneven movement of sand due to longshore drift along this section of coast. The north side of the river at North Glenelg will lose all its sand if replenishment action does not keep up. It is pretty thin as we speak.
Posted: Mon Sep 11, 2006 2:01 pm
by crawf
Done wrote:I never knew there were youg people in Adelaide
thats one of the most stupidest things, i have ever heard you say Done aka Las Vegas
Posted: Tue Sep 12, 2006 10:34 am
by Edgar
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:12 pm
by mrblack
check dis out fools
interesting vid of the beachouse and da new trams.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY_FgKsF ... ed&search=
Posted: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:15 pm
by Howie
Nice did you make that video?
Posted: Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:24 pm
by mrblack
negative, i just was looking around youtube and came across it.
Glenelg Development News and Progress Thread
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:12 pm
by shinji_123
Yes = Positive impact
No = Negative impact
The recent Holdfast Shores development consist of the redevelopment of Moseley Square - also addition of new shops/cafes to Moseley square, the addition of the 'Beachhouse' which replaced Magic Mountain and the development of new apartments on the foreshore.
I'd like to see both sides to the arguement here. So if anyone has been affected in any way (Whether ur a local or tourist) in either a positive or negative way due to these developments please let us know.
Here are some previous posts on The developments.
Glenelg Entertainment Complex (New Magic Mountain)
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... .php?t=144
Moseley Square Redevelopment
http://www.sensational-adelaide.com/for ... c.php?t=81
Cheers
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 11:02 pm
by AtD
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:01 am
by JAKJ
The developments have been good... but it could have been a lot better...
Holdfast shores, the Marina etc will all date very quickly, it is unfortunate that a higher standard of construction/design, better utilising the beach front wasn't employed.
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 12:45 pm
by Will
Those that criticise the development have an incorrect and nostalgic, fanciful view of what Glenelg used to be. However in fact they are wrong; before Holdfast Shores Glenelg was slow and many of the shops along Jetty Road were vacant. Where the marina is now there used to be a car-park which the nostalgics claim was a family fun park, but in reality it was a car-park where bogans would do burn-outs and drink beer. Holdfast Shores has had a massive positive impact for Glenelg. It has increased property values, it has added a new tourist assett to the state, it has also stimulated other improvements and modernisations across Glenelg. Although the development could have been better, for example the Colley Street facade of the Pier hotel is bland, Platinum should have been 15 stories and the shops fronting Jetty Road should have been 5 levels high and included a cinema, the development is still a positive move to Glenelg. One which future generations will acclaim as visionary.
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 4:13 pm
by crawf
I dont know if holdfast shores was a success or not. because every time ive been down there, its dead.
also the beachhouse is pretty pathetic, especially their website.
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 10:29 pm
by AtD
Because we all know the website is the most important part of a development.
Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 12:20 pm
by Will
crawf wrote:I dont know if holdfast shores was a success or not. because every time ive been down there, its dead.
also the beachhouse is pretty pathetic, especially their website.
You are going at the wrong times...