Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in areas other than the CBD and North Adelaide. Includes Port Adelaide and Glenelg.
-
SRW
- Donating Member
- Posts: 3659
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2007 9:42 pm
- Location: Glenelg
#16
Post
by SRW » Tue Jul 14, 2015 6:03 pm
Nathan wrote:Patrick_27 wrote:Surely the hotel is heritage listed?
I don't really understand why developers are so eager to prop up low/medium-rise developments on the fringe of the city? In-case they haven't noticed, we have a massive city grid that for the most part hasn't been developed. Not to mention there are also an abundant of vacant office buildings along Fullarton and Greehill Road that that could be converted into apartments...
Read the article again. The original hotel will be preserved, the development is for the open lot car park area, and part of the beer garden.
The location is closer to the thick of the city than many spots within the square mile. It will have unbroken views over the Botanic Gardens and Rundle Park, and the East End is a couple of minutes away by foot. That area of Kent Town is also covered by the height increases for urban infill.
Added emphasis, as it really is the key.
Adding density across the square mile is of course important, but we really do get the most benefit from increasing the critical mass of already established areas. And with the the hospital leaving the East End, bringing in extra residents will help to keep that precinct a thriving part of the city.
Keep Adelaide Weird
-
[Shuz]
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3306
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
#17
Post
by [Shuz] » Wed Jul 15, 2015 8:23 am
Now that I think about it - 15 levels is a sizable development. That ought to be about 60m?
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
-
ml69
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1008
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 11:16 pm
- Location: Adelaide SA
#18
Post
by ml69 » Wed Jul 15, 2015 7:00 pm
[Shuz] wrote:Now that I think about it - 15 levels is a sizable development. That ought to be about 60m?
More like 45-48m. Residential apartments typically have a floor to floor height between 3-3.2m, whereas offices have a floor to floor height between 3.8-4.0m.
-
[Shuz]
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3306
- Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 5:26 pm
#19
Post
by [Shuz] » Thu Jul 16, 2015 8:07 am
That wouldn't make it the tallest outside the Adelaide CBD then.
Air Apartments is 55m, Atlantic Tower Glenelg is 48m.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
-
Ben
- VIP Member
- Posts: 7577
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#20
Post
by Ben » Thu Jul 16, 2015 9:24 am
[Shuz] wrote:That wouldn't make it the tallest outside the Adelaide CBD then.
Air Apartments is 55m, Atlantic Tower Glenelg is 48m.
I think The Advertiser were going by the number of level not the height. I guess at 15 levels that's the most outside of the CBD but not actually the tallest as Air apartments was an old office building converted. It could be tallest but will have to wait further information unlike the advertiser who just speculate and write it as fact.
-
Waewick
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm
#21
Post
by Waewick » Sat Jul 18, 2015 1:43 pm
Seriously a preserve Kent town association, is this state insane.
-
Will
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5869
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 6:48 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#22
Post
by Will » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:38 pm
Waewick wrote:Seriously a preserve Kent town association, is this state insane.
Similar organisations exist interstate too.
As an example, I recall there was a similar one in Melbourne that protested against the proposed freeway that was cancelled by the new state government.
-
Waewick
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm
#23
Post
by Waewick » Mon Jul 20, 2015 10:41 pm
Will wrote:Waewick wrote:Seriously a preserve Kent town association, is this state insane.
Similar organisations exist interstate too.
As an example, I recall there was a similar one in Melbourne that protested against the proposed freeway that was cancelled by the new state government.
They were insane too.
-
Patrick_27
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2581
- Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2013 4:41 pm
- Location: Adelaide CBD, SA
#24
Post
by Patrick_27 » Mon Jul 20, 2015 11:11 pm
Waewick wrote:Will wrote:Waewick wrote:Seriously a preserve Kent town association, is this state insane.
Similar organisations exist interstate too.
As an example, I recall there was a similar one in Melbourne that protested against the proposed freeway that was cancelled by the new state government.
They were insane too.
No, they were actually very right in fighting that cause. Read the reports on it, the freeway was an expensive lemon that was going to do more damage to culturally significant areas than actually provide what it was intended to provide. Melbourne need more invested in rail infrastructure, whilst there are some issues with their freeway network the east-west link in the form it was proposed was not a solution. Just like aspects of the MATS plan here.
-
Waewick
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 3791
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm
#25
Post
by Waewick » Mon Jul 20, 2015 11:15 pm
Patrick_27 wrote:Waewick wrote:Will wrote:
Similar organisations exist interstate too.
As an example, I recall there was a similar one in Melbourne that protested against the proposed freeway that was cancelled by the new state government.
They were insane too.
No, they were actually very right in fighting that cause. Read the reports on it, the freeway was an expensive lemon that was going to do more damage to culturally significant areas than actually provide what it was intended to provide. Melbourne need more invested in rail infrastructure, whilst there are some issues with their freeway network the east-west link in the form it was proposed was not a solution. Just like aspects of the MATS plan here.
you are right, I was being a bit facetious.
Funnily enough I stayed a week or so in one of the areas that would have benefited from it, well in theory.
they all wanted a none existent tram line, the people I spoke too were starting to regret the way it panned out because now they'll get nothing
-
Ben
- VIP Member
- Posts: 7577
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:46 am
- Location: Adelaide
#26
Post
by Ben » Wed Oct 21, 2015 4:39 pm
This is now on public notification.
http://www.dac.sa.gov.au/publications
One of the more interesting designs we have had. Looks as though the whole façade is movable. Opening and closing champagne coloured mesh.
There will be 128 apartments in this development.
-
Attachments
-
- KT.JPG (147.85 KiB) Viewed 10507 times
-
- kt0.JPG (136.46 KiB) Viewed 10507 times
-
- kt5.JPG (100.76 KiB) Viewed 10507 times
-
- kt4.JPG (83.79 KiB) Viewed 10507 times
-
- kt3.JPG (89.69 KiB) Viewed 10507 times
-
- kt2.JPG (140.07 KiB) Viewed 10507 times
-
- KT1.JPG (128.64 KiB) Viewed 10507 times
-
Goodsy
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 10:39 am
#27
Post
by Goodsy » Wed Oct 21, 2015 6:00 pm
wow that looks sweet
-
Wayno
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5138
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
- Location: Torrens Park
#29
Post
by Wayno » Wed Oct 21, 2015 8:44 pm
Yesssssss!!!
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.
-
crawf
- Donating Member
- Posts: 5521
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
- Location: Adelaide
#30
Post
by crawf » Wed Oct 21, 2015 11:30 pm
Very unique and interesting design. The cladding will either make or break this building.
It could be an architectural masterpiece or a hideous mess, giving the nearby North Terrace House some competition.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 2 guests