Page 110 of 142

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:06 pm
by Prodical
Second crane is being increased in height this evening

and I for one think it is now a much better and more accessible public space than that soulless and tired plaza that it replaced

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:19 pm
by SRW
Of note re: plaza, several collapsable umbrellas (in similar style to steel trees) have been recently installed. Evidently, not enough shade planned (though, as above, still an improvement).

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2022 10:11 am
by Nort
Prodical wrote:
Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:06 pm
Second crane is being increased in height this evening

and I for one think it is now a much better and more accessible public space than that soulless and tired plaza that it replaced
It was soulless and tired because it had been neglected and allowed to decay for decades (some might say so that it was seen as disposable and could be redeveloped)

The areas of the plaza currently accessible certainly are more inviting, and hopefully they avoid the neglect that projects like these often see once they're no longer the new hotness. See the landscaping and water features on and around the neighbouring footbridge and how quickly they were abandoned.

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2022 3:06 pm
by Prodical
From today - level 23 in the core

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 10:05 am
by Brucetiki
relapse wrote:
Mon Nov 21, 2022 5:56 pm
The Plaza area is an absolute joke.

What a completely missed opportunity to turn the space into something usable.

2-3 years of work and for what? some metal trees and a horrible poorly designed car park?

Embarrassing
The car park is a disgrace and is actually unusable for Festival Theatre events.

When we saw 9 to 5 there the other week, it took close to 30 minutes getting into the car park, meaning we nearly missed the start of the show (and this was with the theatre only being about 40-45% full). At the end of the show, it took about 20 minutes to pay for parking, about another 10 minutes to get a lift down to the car, and another 25 minutes to get out.

The Festival Theatre would be better off telling their patrons to not use the car park for shows.

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 11:01 am
by SRW
Brucetiki wrote:
Fri Nov 25, 2022 10:05 am
relapse wrote:
Mon Nov 21, 2022 5:56 pm
The Plaza area is an absolute joke.

What a completely missed opportunity to turn the space into something usable.

2-3 years of work and for what? some metal trees and a horrible poorly designed car park?

Embarrassing
The car park is a disgrace and is actually unusable for Festival Theatre events.

When we saw 9 to 5 there the other week, it took close to 30 minutes getting into the car park, meaning we nearly missed the start of the show (and this was with the theatre only being about 40-45% full). At the end of the show, it took about 20 minutes to pay for parking, about another 10 minutes to get a lift down to the car, and another 25 minutes to get out.

The Festival Theatre would be better off telling their patrons to not use the car park for shows.
I haven't parked there so I'm not quite understanding why? Many carparks around Rundle Mall can take a long time to exit at peak times, but never 30 mins just to enter.

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 12:47 pm
by Ben
Brucetiki wrote:
Fri Nov 25, 2022 10:05 am
relapse wrote:
Mon Nov 21, 2022 5:56 pm
The Plaza area is an absolute joke.

What a completely missed opportunity to turn the space into something usable.

2-3 years of work and for what? some metal trees and a horrible poorly designed car park?

Embarrassing
The car park is a disgrace and is actually unusable for Festival Theatre events.

When we saw 9 to 5 there the other week, it took close to 30 minutes getting into the car park, meaning we nearly missed the start of the show (and this was with the theatre only being about 40-45% full). At the end of the show, it took about 20 minutes to pay for parking, about another 10 minutes to get a lift down to the car, and another 25 minutes to get out.

The Festival Theatre would be better off telling their patrons to not use the car park for shows.
It once took me just short of an hour to leave. It’s a terrible design.

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Fri Nov 25, 2022 11:44 pm
by Patrick_27
The car park doesn’t work because of the number of parks available vs. number of access points for cars. Also, the high volume of cars entering and exiting the car park are for select times (i.e. leading up to a performance or at the end of a performance). Whereas any car park of similar size in the CBD is taking in staggered volumes of cars throughout any given day (even during peak hour). This car park didn’t need to be as big as it is, the area sufficed previously without the sheer number of car parks it has now (from 300 to 1,200), even with the casino and Walker development, they could have settled for double what was there previously.

I was at the theatre the other night and noticed that in burying the Festival Theatre somewhat, they’ve left some of the ailing features of the theatre intact (namely around by the stage door) hiding behind or underneath the new ’ground’ level, I also noticed that it appears to already have significant leaking issues around this area also. Makes you wonder whether this area was ever intended to be engineered this way, or if it’s mere cost cutting.

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:14 pm
by ChillyPhilly
I am starting to realise that Walker Corp is quite a cheap and nasty developer.

Buckland Park as a whole and the set of new traffic lights (ugh) on Port Wakefield Road is a good example of this.

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:56 pm
by HiTouch
ChillyPhilly wrote:
Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:14 pm
I am starting to realise that Walker Corp is quite a cheap and nasty developer.

Buckland Park as a whole and the set of new traffic lights (ugh) on Port Wakefield Road is a good example of this.
Very true. Festival Plaza = Bad infrastructure and features in the wrong place
Buckland Park = No infrastructure, public trans in place, built on floodplains.

If we can't trust them to build a building, why trust them to build a suburb?

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 1:32 am
by joelmark2
Some plaza pics from mid November — apologies have had trouble with access to this site with my registered email for joelmark so am now joelmark2
F130FE55-C8E8-444C-A481-0217906E52A7.jpeg
A9B22A82-E7B5-42D6-B367-2BC0FB9BCAF0.jpeg
583EBDCB-344A-40D6-BD52-091B1392F7D1.jpeg

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 11:04 am
by Llessur2002
From Saturday:

Image

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Mon Nov 28, 2022 12:33 pm
by flat04
ChillyPhilly wrote:
Sun Nov 27, 2022 6:14 pm
I am starting to realise that Walker Corp is quite a cheap and nasty developer.....
Just in case anyone is wondering why the 21st floor number is now greyed out.... :lol:

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2022 12:21 pm
by VinyTapestry849
joelmark2 wrote:
Mon Nov 28, 2022 1:32 am
Some plaza pics from mid November — apologies have had trouble with access to this site with my registered email for joelmark so am now joelmark2 F130FE55-C8E8-444C-A481-0217906E52A7.jpegA9B22A82-E7B5-42D6-B367-2BC0FB9BCAF0.jpeg583EBDCB-344A-40D6-BD52-091B1392F7D1.jpeg
Third one >>>

[COM] Re: Festival Plaza Incl. 115m Tower | $800 million

Posted: Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:49 pm
by AndyWelsh
From today

Image


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk