Page 12 of 18
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 3:36 pm
by [Shuz]
It seems this project is going by the name of Qi, and the street address is now 70 Franklin after the merge of land titles.
Mods, I'd suggest updating the thread title to;
U/C: 70 Franklin Street | 70m | 19lvls | Mixed-Use
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 4:29 pm
by Will
[Shuz] wrote:It seems this project is going by the name of Qi, and the street address is now 70 Franklin after the merge of land titles.
Mods, I'd suggest updating the thread title to;
U/C: 70 Franklin Street | 70m | 19lvls | Mixed-Use
Qi only refers to the residential component of the development. The commercial component is going under the name of 70 Franklin Street.
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:06 pm
by Thanial
isn't this one 73m?
maybe changing it to something like this would be better.
U/C: 58-76 Franklin Street | 73/60m | 19/16lvls | Mixed-Use
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:01 pm
by UrbanSG
Core box pic taken today:
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:50 am
by Xaragmata
From Monday...
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:58 pm
by Ben
new Website:
Office:
http://www.70franklin.com.au/
Residential:
http://www.qiliving.net.au/
Bit of an idea of the impact on the skyline too:
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:15 pm
by crawf
It's not the most exciting design, though it could look quite good if sexy quality glass is used.
The impact this will make on tired old Franklin Street will be fantastic and is sorely needed.
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 7:31 pm
by Wayno
zzzzzzip! looks like a giant fly...
- zip.jpg (86.5 KiB) Viewed 3617 times
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2012 9:07 am
by [Shuz]
Although not that tall, it appears to be quite a wide tower across the Franklin Street frontage. Seeing as the developer behind this is the same one as 400KWS, if they can create the same kind of effect, and use good quality glass, I think it'll turn out to be pretty good.
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:55 pm
by UrbanSG
Pics taken today:
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 8:50 pm
by shiftaling
Ben, I was wondering if you might have a word or two to say explaining the meaning of the curved lines in the photo/diagram you posted? Very intrguing, what do they represent?
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2012 9:49 pm
by Pants
It's from the advertising brochure, with the curved lines highlighting nearby landmarks/attractions
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 9:29 am
by Ben
Adelaide really really struggles when it comes to apartment building sales. It's really disappointing this has happened yet again!
DA/322/2010/D 17/02/2012
Development Application Received
Vary previous authorisation to demolish existing building fronting Franklin Street, construct further 5 levels to existing Young Street car park, reclad facade and upgrade existing retail tenancies, construct 16 level residential building and 19 level office building with associated car parking - VARIATION - change the use to serviced apartments.
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:02 pm
by Waewick
I think it will depend on what how who and why before I get disappointed.
it could simply be a tick of approval to the States future rather than a negative - depending on who the operator is.
[COM] Re: U/C: 58-76 Franklin St | 19, 16 & 10 | Office, Res and c
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2012 12:58 pm
by Dvious
I think its heavily due to location, that end of the city is still pretty rough in my eyes and franklin st is still very under developed, and until we start seeing some nice architectural buildings with height in the city, its going to be hard to sell apartments like this.