[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 1:57 pm
Thank God thats only a mock up image...
Or, the journalist who wrote that article, is a poster on this forum..
Sensational-Adelaide.com
Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/
207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5991
Page 12 of 32
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 2:59 pm
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 3:26 pm
Almost everything in the article is wrong. The Advertiser clearly hasn't received their information from anyone involved in the project. That 'mock-up' image they've produced is comically bad - did they get the work experience kid to produce it using google?
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 3:35 pm
So the final design looks nada like this?
And thank you for confirming the stupidity behind the article.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:40 pm
Another thing that doesn't make sense in that article is that they state the airport says that the 230m building was too tall and size needed to be reduced 35m but then later in the article, it states that the airport "doesn't necessarily care about size", it just needs approval from the relevant bodies.
Why state any height when nothing has been confirmed? Or has 1990crow *cough* excuse me *cough* I mean the journalist just looked at the title and assumed.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 5:16 pm
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 6:20 pm
The initial confusion was whether the purported heights were expressed as AHD or height above street. It's quite embarrassing to see how the Advertiser 'journalist' spins that into some apparent high level board discussion where the height of the building was 'reduced'.HiTouch wrote: ↑Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:40 pmAnother thing that doesn't make sense in that article is that they state the airport says that the 230m building was too tall and size needed to be reduced 35m but then later in the article, it states that the airport "doesn't necessarily care about size", it just needs approval from the relevant bodies.
Why state any height when nothing has been confirmed? Or has 1990crow *cough* excuse me *cough* I mean the journalist just looked at the title and assumed.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 8:44 pm
What was the point of this article?
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 10:07 pm
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2018 11:17 pm
Engineer in Ballina, NSW but close!
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 8:31 am
I think personally it's in the wrong place
Sent from my SM-J730G using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-J730G using Tapatalk
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:00 am
I personally think it's in exactly the right place. Furthest distance from the airport while remaining within the Capital City Zone for planning and being at the corner of two main thoroughfares. The centre of the skyline will have to start moving east now that height is being constrained by airspace.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:09 am
I agree. As long as it's in the square mile, it's in a good spot. This spot won't make the skyline look awkward anyway.CDJ wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:00 amI personally think it's in exactly the right place. Furthest distance from the airport while remaining within the Capital City Zone for planning and being at the corner of two main thoroughfares. The centre of the skyline will have to start moving east now that height is being constrained by airspace.
From all viewpoints, it will look like it's in between Kodo and Adelaidean/Realm and that's not a bad thing.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:21 am
Yes I agree. And from street level it will make a wonderful impact to the area.CDJ wrote: ↑Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:00 amI personally think it's in exactly the right place. Furthest distance from the airport while remaining within the Capital City Zone for planning and being at the corner of two main thoroughfares. The centre of the skyline will have to start moving east now that height is being constrained by airspace.
Any confirmation of the model used in the article is the design being put forward?
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 195m | 60 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2018 11:28 am
It doesn't look too bad when the perspective is fixed
