[COM] New Royal Adelaide Hospital | $2.1b

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#166 Post by Cruise » Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:00 am

Martin hamiton-smith will personally rip the started work away with a sledge hammer and shovel

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5521
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#167 Post by crawf » Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:17 pm

Hopefully Mr Hamilton-Smith will retire before the 2010 state election :lol:

urban
Legendary Member!
Posts: 611
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 10:59 am
Location: City of Unley

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#168 Post by urban » Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:20 pm

At the current rate of Liberal leaders we should see another 2 before the next election.

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#169 Post by Shuz » Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:15 pm

urban wrote:At the current rate of Liberal leaders we should see another 2 before the next election.
At this rate, theyre all worse than the previous one. I'd say 3 more. And then about 6 thereafter during Rann's 3rd term in 2010.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2721
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#170 Post by Ho Really » Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:01 am

Let's say that the "Marj" is not built and the RAH is redeveloped. How would you guys do it?

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2721
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#171 Post by Ho Really » Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:08 am

Also, looking at the aerial images of the "Marj" it looks like there's very limited vehicular access. It seems you can only gain entry from North Terrace. I hope they look at a bridge at the Torrens Lake weir and an underpass under the rail lines for access from the north. I know this won't help the restaurant and the golfers on the north side of the weir, but a hospital should always have good access in case of emergencies. What do you guys think?

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
jimmy_2486
Legendary Member!
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Glenelg-Marion Area

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#172 Post by jimmy_2486 » Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:23 pm

Instead of calling it the Margarery Jackson Hospital, we should call it the Samuel L Jackson Hospital!!!!

And have a 'Snakes on a Plane' ward, a 'Pulp fiction ward' etc etc hahaah

jane
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:15 pm

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#173 Post by jane » Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:18 pm

Has anything been done in terms of desgin yet? Or is that still all up in the air?

Thanks :)

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2721
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#174 Post by Ho Really » Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:24 pm

jane wrote:Has anything been done in terms of desgin yet? Or is that still all up in the air?

Thanks :)
There should be a concept design somewhere with floorplans as well. Maybe give the state health minister a tingle.

Cheers
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

User avatar
rhino
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3093
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 4:37 pm
Location: Nairne

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#175 Post by rhino » Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:37 am

jane wrote:Has anything been done in terms of desgin yet? Or is that still all up in the air?

Thanks :)

If it's not up in the air it will squash the trains! :wink:
cheers,
Rhino

jane
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:15 pm

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#176 Post by jane » Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:03 pm

Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately I need the information for an assignment for Uni, and we are not allowed to approach anyone from the government for it. So I was really hoping they would be somewhere I could just go and have a look at them.

Hehe, perhaps if it were up in the air there wouldn't be all this trouble with the parklands!

User avatar
Shuz
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2538
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 1:48 pm
Location: Glandore

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#177 Post by Shuz » Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:32 pm

Just to clarify - is the Goverment dead-set about building it on the railyards site, or is there still time for negotiation to relocate/redevelop on either the RAH site, Clipsal, Keswick Barracks, etc?

User avatar
Cruise
Banned
Banned
Posts: 2201
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Bay 115, Football Park

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#178 Post by Cruise » Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:43 pm

momentkiller wrote:Just to clarify - is the Goverment dead-set about building it on the railyards site, or is there still time for negotiation to relocate/redevelop on either the RAH site, Clipsal, Keswick Barracks, etc?
They say, we follow. its like a dictatorship

User avatar
AtD
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 4579
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:00 pm
Location: Sydney

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#179 Post by AtD » Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:05 pm

The way this project has been discussed, I suspect it was leaked to the media before it was ready, and the government launched the whole project too early to save face. I wouldn't be surprised if it gets shelved.

User avatar
jimmy_2486
Legendary Member!
Posts: 619
Joined: Wed Apr 18, 2007 9:28 pm
Location: Glenelg-Marion Area

[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH

#180 Post by jimmy_2486 » Sat Sep 08, 2007 3:36 pm

I think our shelf is starting to look full wouldn't u say?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot] and 12 guests