Page 12 of 78
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:00 am
by Cruise
Martin hamiton-smith will personally rip the started work away with a sledge hammer and shovel
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:17 pm
by crawf
Hopefully Mr Hamilton-Smith will retire before the 2010 state election
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:20 pm
by urban
At the current rate of Liberal leaders we should see another 2 before the next election.
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:15 pm
by Shuz
urban wrote:At the current rate of Liberal leaders we should see another 2 before the next election.
At this rate, theyre all worse than the previous one. I'd say 3 more. And then about 6 thereafter during Rann's 3rd term in 2010.
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:01 am
by Ho Really
Let's say that the "Marj" is not built and the RAH is redeveloped. How would you guys do it?
Cheers
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2007 12:08 am
by Ho Really
Also, looking at the aerial images of the "Marj" it looks like there's very limited vehicular access. It seems you can only gain entry from North Terrace. I hope they look at a bridge at the Torrens Lake weir and an underpass under the rail lines for access from the north. I know this won't help the restaurant and the golfers on the north side of the weir, but a hospital should always have good access in case of emergencies. What do you guys think?
Cheers
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 10:23 pm
by jimmy_2486
Instead of calling it the Margarery Jackson Hospital, we should call it the Samuel L Jackson Hospital!!!!
And have a 'Snakes on a Plane' ward, a 'Pulp fiction ward' etc etc hahaah
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 4:18 pm
by jane
Has anything been done in terms of desgin yet? Or is that still all up in the air?
Thanks
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Thu Sep 06, 2007 11:24 pm
by Ho Really
jane wrote:Has anything been done in terms of desgin yet? Or is that still all up in the air?
Thanks
There should be a concept design somewhere with floorplans as well. Maybe give the state health minister a tingle.
Cheers
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Fri Sep 07, 2007 9:37 am
by rhino
jane wrote:Has anything been done in terms of desgin yet? Or is that still all up in the air?
Thanks
If it's not up in the air it will squash the trains!
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 12:03 pm
by jane
Thanks for the suggestion. Unfortunately I need the information for an assignment for Uni, and we are not allowed to approach anyone from the government for it. So I was really hoping they would be somewhere I could just go and have a look at them.
Hehe, perhaps if it were up in the air there wouldn't be all this trouble with the parklands!
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:32 pm
by Shuz
Just to clarify - is the Goverment dead-set about building it on the railyards site, or is there still time for negotiation to relocate/redevelop on either the RAH site, Clipsal, Keswick Barracks, etc?
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:43 pm
by Cruise
momentkiller wrote:Just to clarify - is the Goverment dead-set about building it on the railyards site, or is there still time for negotiation to relocate/redevelop on either the RAH site, Clipsal, Keswick Barracks, etc?
They say, we follow. its like a dictatorship
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 2:05 pm
by AtD
The way this project has been discussed, I suspect it was leaked to the media before it was ready, and the government launched the whole project too early to save face. I wouldn't be surprised if it gets shelved.
[COM] Re: $1.7bn plan to build a new RAH
Posted: Sat Sep 08, 2007 3:36 pm
by jimmy_2486
I think our shelf is starting to look full wouldn't u say?