No it shouldn't. Obahn carries more people per day than heavy rail can at full capacity. Ditto for trams. It has the added advantage of being able to drive off to feeder routes negating the need for transfer at the interchange. It's literally the most efficient pt service in Adelaide. Like it or not, the o bahn is awesome and should be rebuilt.
News & Discussion: O-Bahn
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
Vehemently disagree.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
The one made on page 84 of this thread...
The most recent one, duh.
The most recent one, duh.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
The Obahn should be demolished and replaced with a freeway and heavy rail, with bus depot/interchange/park&ride at key points.Zills wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 3:21 pmNo it shouldn't. Obahn carries more people per day than heavy rail can at full capacity. Ditto for trams. It has the added advantage of being able to drive off to feeder routes negating the need for transfer at the interchange. It's literally the most efficient pt service in Adelaide. Like it or not, the o bahn is awesome and should be rebuilt.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2006
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
So, is there a reason for spending a huge amount of money? Especially in view of the fact that the O-Bahn allows people to travel without transfers.
Now, if it's because you are a rail fan and it's your preference, fair enough. I'm a tram fan, so I completely understand preferences. However, 90% of people aren't even PT enthusiasts of any sort, let alone train or tram specific. So, possibly, you are representing 5% or less of the population.
So, are you expressing a personal opinion, and that's that? If so, fair enough. I prefer a tramway. Thus far we are equal...and with 5% of the population agreeing with each of us, and 90% likely to tell us "yeah, nah".
-
- Gold-Member ;)
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2022 6:23 pm
- Location: Inner South
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
How do you do the freeway without destroying linear park and the areas that would require interchanges?rev wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 1:15 pmThe Obahn should be demolished and replaced with a freeway and heavy rail, with bus depot/interchange/park&ride at key points.Zills wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 3:21 pmNo it shouldn't. Obahn carries more people per day than heavy rail can at full capacity. Ditto for trams. It has the added advantage of being able to drive off to feeder routes negating the need for transfer at the interchange. It's literally the most efficient pt service in Adelaide. Like it or not, the o bahn is awesome and should be rebuilt.
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
Utilizing the existing parking infrastructure footprint? build the freeway elevated particularly in those spots, run the train at ground level mostly.cocoiadrop wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 1:55 pmHow do you do the freeway without destroying linear park and the areas that would require interchanges?rev wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 1:15 pmThe Obahn should be demolished and replaced with a freeway and heavy rail, with bus depot/interchange/park&ride at key points.Zills wrote: ↑Wed Aug 09, 2023 3:21 pm
No it shouldn't. Obahn carries more people per day than heavy rail can at full capacity. Ditto for trams. It has the added advantage of being able to drive off to feeder routes negating the need for transfer at the interchange. It's literally the most efficient pt service in Adelaide. Like it or not, the o bahn is awesome and should be rebuilt.
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
Do you seriously propose an elevated freeway over the Torrens Linear Park !?? Given the neighbours' concerns about the height of a car park, that can never happen!rev wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 2:38 pmUtilizing the existing parking infrastructure footprint? build the freeway elevated particularly in those spots, run the train at ground level mostly.cocoiadrop wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 1:55 pmHow do you do the freeway without destroying linear park and the areas that would require interchanges?
I see no need for a freeway there anyway - much more important to complete the N-S motorway and connect it at least once to the South Eastern Freeway - maybe two or three (Monarto-Annadale, Mount Barker-Darlington, Glen Osmond-Wingfield)
O'Bahn seems to be doing a fine job for its place, with much less obtrusive invasion than a freeway.
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
It can never happen because governments in SA pander to whingers because the advertiser picks up their story and runs with it.SBD wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 7:16 pmDo you seriously propose an elevated freeway over the Torrens Linear Park !?? Given the neighbours' concerns about the height of a car park, that can never happen!rev wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 2:38 pmUtilizing the existing parking infrastructure footprint? build the freeway elevated particularly in those spots, run the train at ground level mostly.cocoiadrop wrote: ↑Thu Aug 10, 2023 1:55 pm
How do you do the freeway without destroying linear park and the areas that would require interchanges?
I see no need for a freeway there anyway - much more important to complete the N-S motorway and connect it at least once to the South Eastern Freeway - maybe two or three (Monarto-Annadale, Mount Barker-Darlington, Glen Osmond-Wingfield)
O'Bahn seems to be doing a fine job for its place, with much less obtrusive invasion than a freeway.
Much of the park could be left alone, with property acquisitions for a straighter run for a freeway/motorway and rail link.
Rail link would connect to the often talked about future CBD rail loop/tunnel.
The freeway could connect to SEF and NSM with links, finally fixing Portrush road, and either the so called short south link that was floated or Cross road being done.
Our transport infrastructure is lacking today. Our population is going to grow to over 2 million in the next 3 decades. Infrastructure needs to be built for that, preferably before things get worse.
- ChillyPhilly
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2745
- Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
- Location: Kaurna Land.
- Contact:
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
A freeway above the Torrens would be a sonic, visual, economic, social and environmental disaster.
Objectively speaking if converted, at best it could be a light rail corridor. The urban form along the corridor doesn't justify heavy rail.
The Modbury Freeway, on which the O-Bahn partly runs, would have connected the CBD/North Adelaide with Hillbank at what is now the intersection of Main North Road and Black Top Road.
Objectively speaking if converted, at best it could be a light rail corridor. The urban form along the corridor doesn't justify heavy rail.
The Modbury Freeway, on which the O-Bahn partly runs, would have connected the CBD/North Adelaide with Hillbank at what is now the intersection of Main North Road and Black Top Road.
Our state, our city, our future.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
All views expressed on this forum are my own.
-
- High Rise Poster!
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sat Jun 10, 2017 6:01 pm
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
Is there any way to improve the O-Bahn that doesn't involve turning it into a heavy rail?
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
Quieter buses? Would electric or the hydrogen buses do the trick?RetroGamer87 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 12, 2023 12:33 amIs there any way to improve the O-Bahn that doesn't involve turning it into a heavy rail?
Improving the interchanges with updated cover/amenities? More parking spaces?
What about extending it a little further north?
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2006
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: O-Bahn
Hybrid trolleybus/battery have been run for a while in Europe. They would be perfect for the O-Bahn. Use the O-Bahn track for overhead wire operations and run without wires into the CBD and where the buses head off the O-Bahn into suburbia.rev wrote: ↑Sat Aug 12, 2023 10:32 amQuieter buses? Would electric or the hydrogen buses do the trick?RetroGamer87 wrote: ↑Sat Aug 12, 2023 12:33 amIs there any way to improve the O-Bahn that doesn't involve turning it into a heavy rail?
Improving the interchanges with updated cover/amenities? More parking spaces?
What about extending it a little further north?
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot], Google [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests