News & Discussion: Trams
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Most of the light poles between Frome Street and East Terrace on the southern side of North Terrace have been removed.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2003
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Interestingly, those poles were actually used for holding up the span wires for the MTT trams down North Terrace.
I wonder if anyone thought to test them to see if they could be recycled for...holding up span wires.
- Llessur2002
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2014 4:59 pm
- Location: Inner West
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
When I spoke to the DPTI chaps in the mall a few months back they advised that most of the existing street lamps would be able to be used to hold the span wires for the tram extension.
I would assume therefore that if any are being removed then it will be due to a legitimate reason rather than an oversight.
I would assume therefore that if any are being removed then it will be due to a legitimate reason rather than an oversight.
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
The light poles that are capable of supporting the new tram wires are those "Adelaide Poles" that were installed along North Terrace in the upgrades of 2003-10. Sections of Nth Tce that haven't been upgraded yet for example the section between Frome and East Tce will either need new infrastructure to support the wiring or the Adelaide Pole. The 5 million dollars that the ACC is contributing to the project will presumably bring the Frome-East Tce section up to a similar standard as the 2003-10 upgrades outside the museum, govt. house etc. and if we're lucky we might see the section from King William Street to Gawler Pl south side done too (or at least improved).
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2003
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
The existing poles could certainly carry tramway overhead - that was their original function, and poles of that design (it was a British Standard iirc) did so successfully for years on systems using British Standards for tramway overhead.Joelmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:39 amThe light poles that are capable of supporting the new tram wires are those "Adelaide Poles" that were installed along North Terrace in the upgrades of 2003-10. Sections of Nth Tce that haven't been upgraded yet for example the section between Frome and East Tce will either need new infrastructure to support the wiring or the Adelaide Pole. The 5 million dollars that the ACC is contributing to the project will presumably bring the Frome-East Tce section up to a similar standard as the 2003-10 upgrades outside the museum, govt. house etc. and if we're lucky we might see the section from King William Street to Gawler Pl south side done too (or at least improved).
Possibly though, the new poles have better lighting? If the old poles were being replaced solely for putting up tram overhead, one would need to ask about whether that was gold plating.
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
I think the old poles also carried wires for the lights, so they are undergrounding those lines as far as I can see.
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Do not understand why this wasn't done in the first place. For our premier boulevard, North Terrace is such a mish-mash.Joelmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:39 amThe 5 million dollars that the ACC is contributing to the project will presumably bring the Frome-East Tce section up to a similar standard as the 2003-10 upgrades outside the museum, govt. house etc. and if we're lucky we might see the section from King William Street to Gawler Pl south side done too (or at least improved).
Those poles used to run along the entire stretch of North Terrace. However last decade they were replaced with modern light poles to improve the lighting and most importantly, the streetscape.rubberman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:29 amThe existing poles could certainly carry tramway overhead - that was their original function, and poles of that design (it was a British Standard iirc) did so successfully for years on systems using British Standards for tramway overhead.
Possibly though, the new poles have better lighting? If the old poles were being replaced solely for putting up tram overhead, one would need to ask about whether that was gold plating.
This is not gold platting. The old light poles have been needed to be replaced for a very long time, it's only been delayed due to the eventual closure and demolition of the ORAH. In actually fact, street lighting needs to be improved in many parts of the CBD. Minor things like attractive street lighting, can make a big positive impact on its surrounds.
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2003
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Yeah. What I said was that if new poles were being installed because of new lighting requirements, that's fair enough, but if as some have stated, new poles were required to hold up the overhead, then there's a question of gold plating. Those poles were designed to hold up tramway overhead. That's the point.crawf wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 11:34 amDo not understand why this wasn't done in the first place. For our premier boulevard, North Terrace is such a mish-mash.Joelmark wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 12:39 amThe 5 million dollars that the ACC is contributing to the project will presumably bring the Frome-East Tce section up to a similar standard as the 2003-10 upgrades outside the museum, govt. house etc. and if we're lucky we might see the section from King William Street to Gawler Pl south side done too (or at least improved).
Those poles used to run along the entire stretch of North Terrace. However last decade they were replaced with modern light poles to improve the lighting and most importantly, the streetscape.rubberman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 9:29 amThe existing poles could certainly carry tramway overhead - that was their original function, and poles of that design (it was a British Standard iirc) did so successfully for years on systems using British Standards for tramway overhead.
Possibly though, the new poles have better lighting? If the old poles were being replaced solely for putting up tram overhead, one would need to ask about whether that was gold plating.
This is not gold platting. The old light poles have been needed to be replaced for a very long time, it's only been delayed due to the eventual closure and demolition of the ORAH. In actually fact, street lighting needs to be improved in many parts of the CBD. Minor things like attractive street lighting, can make a big positive impact on its surrounds.
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
I don't think it's gold plating to ensure the same standard of pole is used for the length of the extension.
Keep Adelaide Weird
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
So along this stretch of North Terrace there won't be any middle poles like there is along KWS?
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
No. It will be more like Jetty Road.[Shuz] wrote:So along this stretch of North Terrace there won't be any middle poles like there is along KWS?
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2003
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
That's why we pay more per km for tram extensions than Switzerland I guess. It's only money.
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Is Switzerland tram extensions costs a standard that we should be comparing to?rubberman wrote: That's why we pay more per km for tram extensions than Switzerland I guess. It's only money.
Does Australia typically build comparable things cheaper than Switzerland except for tram extensions?
- SouthAussie94
- Legendary Member!
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 10:03 pm
- Location: Southern Suburbs
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
They were designed to hold up tramway overhead 50+ years ago. Standards change. Just because they were suitable 50 years ago, doesn't mean they are suitable now. They've been pulled out, obviously for a reason, as someone who has all of the facts available has decided that they're not suitable for whatever reason. Again, they had all of the facts. I don't (and I presume that you don't either..)rubberman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 1:32 pm
Yeah. What I said was that if new poles were being installed because of new lighting requirements, that's fair enough, but if as some have stated, new poles were required to hold up the overhead, then there's a question of gold plating. Those poles were designed to hold up tramway overhead. That's the point.
It is hardly gold plating..
"All we are is bags of bones pushing against a self imposed tide. Just be content with staying alive"
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
Views and opinions expressed are my own and don't necessarily reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation
-
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2003
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2007 10:32 pm
- Location: ADL ex DRW, ASP, MGB
Re: News & Discussion: Trams
Yep. Let's not question our betters. They know what's best for us.SouthAussie94 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 7:03 pmThey were designed to hold up tramway overhead 50+ years ago. Standards change. Just because they were suitable 50 years ago, doesn't mean they are suitable now. They've been pulled out, obviously for a reason, as someone who has all of the facts available has decided that they're not suitable for whatever reason. Again, they had all of the facts. I don't (and I presume that you don't either..)rubberman wrote: ↑Wed Aug 23, 2017 1:32 pm
Yeah. What I said was that if new poles were being installed because of new lighting requirements, that's fair enough, but if as some have stated, new poles were required to hold up the overhead, then there's a question of gold plating. Those poles were designed to hold up tramway overhead. That's the point.
It is hardly gold plating..
Mind you, centre island platforms, bib and bub Citadis trams and expensive track, don't give me confidence. But as you say, governments know better than us ordinary folk.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Archer and 5 guests