[COM] M2 Northern Connector | 15.5km | $867m

Threads relating to transport, water, etc. within the CBD and Metropolitan area.
Message
Author
User avatar
Prince George
Legendary Member!
Posts: 974
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:02 pm
Location: Melrose Park

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#211 Post by Prince George » Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:02 am

Aidan wrote:Does a cloverleaf still count as a proper freeway style junction? A proper cloverleaf can't handle very much traffic.
I don't believe so. AFAIK, no full cloverleaf junctions are built in the States anymore, and California has a policy of replacing them when it's time for them to be rebuilt.

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#212 Post by drsmith » Sat Oct 24, 2009 1:44 am

Several cloverleafs have been eliminated by adding traffic lights on the non-freeway route. Sometimes, this is even done at the intersection of two freeways, particularly when one freeway terminates at an interchange with another. An example of this is in Lakewood, Washington, at the interchange between Interstate-5 and Wash.-512. A visible ramp stub shows that one of the four leaves was removed; thus eliminating an unsafe weave on I-5. In the future, the traffic signal will be replaced by a two-lane flyover, completing the freeway-to-freeway interchange once again.
Source

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloverleaf_interchange

The cloverleaf is an interchange of the past.

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2138
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#213 Post by Aidan » Sat Oct 24, 2009 3:33 pm

drsmith wrote: The cloverleaf is an interchange of the past.
Not exactly - it's still appropriate for the intersection of two freeways with low traffic volumes. It's just that there are very few places where two freeways with low traffic volumes intersect.

Advantages and disadvantages of various type of grade separated junctions can be found here.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#214 Post by Waewick » Wed Nov 18, 2009 3:33 pm

anyone checked out the project lately

i'm lazy and keen for an update :D

Hooligan
Legendary Member!
Posts: 906
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 8:03 pm

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#215 Post by Hooligan » Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:53 pm

capitalist wrote:anyone checked out the project lately

i'm lazy and keen for an update :D
Well, it's still being planned so i can't give you a photo update.

Code: Select all

Signature removed 

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[COM] #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#216 Post by ChillyPhilly » Mon Jun 14, 2010 12:18 am

DTEI has put up the proposed layout of the Northern Connector on the website.

http://www.infrastructure.sa.gov.au/northern_connector

It can be viewed by downloading the brochure (on the right-hand side of the page).

I'm liking the 'big city thinking' with a more proper approach to planning interchanges. Instead of a piddly widdly traffic light intersection, we're getting the Full Monty at last!
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#217 Post by drsmith » Mon Jun 14, 2010 9:09 pm

The artists impressions of the interchanges have been there for some time. Some changes to minor detail in the latest edition perhaps, but not much.

It would be interesting to know how much the cost is now estimated to be. IIRC, $2bn was suggested when this latest incarnation was initially made public. It will be a sight to behold if ever built but that will depend somewhat on the stability of China's economic growth path.

Out of curiosity, why is the rail line being bridged over the northeastbound carriageway on the Northern Expressway and not the other way around ?

User avatar
Norman
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 6488
Joined: Sun Mar 25, 2007 1:06 pm

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#218 Post by Norman » Tue Jun 15, 2010 9:12 pm

That document has been there for a good year now...

User avatar
ChillyPhilly
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2744
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:35 pm
Location: Kaurna Land.
Contact:

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#219 Post by ChillyPhilly » Thu Jun 24, 2010 3:59 pm

Has it? Already? Either I've gone blind, or...

=/

Not good, Phil, not good.
Our state, our city, our future.

All views expressed on this forum are my own.

User avatar
drsmith
Legendary Member!
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 3:35 pm
Location: Perth

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#220 Post by drsmith » Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:01 am

An entertaining justification for the Northern connector.

http://news-review-messenger.whereilive ... f-highway/

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#221 Post by Waewick » Sun Aug 01, 2010 8:11 pm

:hilarious:

koalaboy
Sen-Rookie-Sational
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:14 am

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#222 Post by koalaboy » Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:53 pm

drsmith wrote:An entertaining justification for the Northern connector.
http://news-review-messenger.whereilive ... f-highway/
What a load of crap. The developers want the Connector so that they can lobby the government for their own interchange to the development. This will make the land more valuable. Roads aren't built as dams, they have equalisation pipes under them so that the pavement doesn't fill with water and collapse. What happens when it rains heavily? The site will flood from the east instead of from the sea to the west. With Buckland Park and this site, the SES will be kept very busy. Luckily they will have freeway linking the sites.

Sorry, I am explaining something that was already implied by your post. Yes, a very entertaining justification.

jase111
Gold-Member ;)
Posts: 98
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 4:20 pm

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#223 Post by jase111 » Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:04 pm

Is this south australia first toll road ?

Aidan
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2138
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 3:10 am
Location: Christies Beach

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#224 Post by Aidan » Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:34 pm

jase111 wrote:Is this south australia first toll road ?
No. At the start of the Freeway in Glen Osmond there's the old tollgate, as that was (AFAIK) SA''s first toll road.

It's not even certain that the Northern Connector will have tolls.
Just build it wrote:Bye Union Hall. I'll see you in another life, when we are both cats.

User avatar
metro
Legendary Member!
Posts: 970
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 10:11 pm
Location: Sydney

[COM] Re: #PRO: Northern Connector | 14km

#225 Post by metro » Wed Jul 13, 2011 7:42 pm

The Premier has said a few times that there will be no tolls roads while Labor are running the state. I think the only way there will be tolls in SA is if the Liberals get in at the next election and they get a private company in to build a new motorway, then it will be a tollway.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Smithy84 and 5 guests