Page 15 of 32

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2011 11:38 am
by fabricator
stumpjumper wrote:
look forward to seeing if any businesses open up in there.
Kayak rentals.
Salt Damp treatment
Drywall repairs
Carpet cleaning
Sump Pump rental

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:07 am
by bm7500
Buckland Park start date

THE first stage of Walker Corporation’s Buckland Park development will start in September this year.

The company announced a $76 million commitment today for the 140 allotment stage to be known as Riverlea.

“Investment in the first stage of the master planned community at Buckland Park signifies Walker’s commitment to Adelaide’s future growth and our confidence in the northern suburbs as a significant part of that process,” company spokesman Michael Eggington said.

“This project will be home to innovation and a fresh start for thousands of South Australian families over the next 25 years.”

The new community at Buckland Park is 30 minutes from the Adelaide CBD in a region earmarked for significant residential and employment growth over the next 25 years.

Between September 2012 and June 2013, more than 630,000 cubic metres of soil will be moved on the site to create 140 allotments across Stage One.

Walker has approval for the initial infrastructure works including providing water, power and gas services to the site. These works commence this Autumn.

http://www.indaily.com.au

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 1:46 pm
by metro
lol at the name: Riverlea

What was wrong with the name Fuckland Park? :roll:

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 2:49 pm
by mokeystyley
metro wrote:lol at the name: Riverlea

What was wrong with the name Fuckland Park? :roll:
Riverpee is much easier to swallow :P

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:22 pm
by Omicron
The article in today's Business Journal makes me despise it even more. What a hateful, ghastly place. To Buckland Park doth ambition and sense go to die.

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:31 pm
by Waewick
worst development.....ever.

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:29 am
by bm7500
Omicron wrote:The article in today's Business Journal makes me despise it even more. What a hateful, ghastly place. To Buckland Park doth ambition and sense go to die.
A spur line from the Gawler line should be sent up to a development of this size!

But I'm interested Omi as to why you think this project will be so horrible.

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 8:25 pm
by P.K.
oh dear, haven't you lot got over this yet!

Haven't you realised yet, that your wimpering little cries of disapproval mean nothing.

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:59 pm
by crawf
It's been three months since the last reply...

Re: #PRO: Buckland Park Development

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2012 8:22 am
by Waewick
well since it has been bumped....

it is still a dud :lol:

Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs

Posted: Tue Jul 29, 2014 6:17 pm
by ChillyPhilly
The first stage of Buckland Park today got approval.

How how how how? So stupid. :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash: :wallbash:
$2 billion satellite city approved

THE State Government has approved the first stage of a proposed $2 billion satellite city north of Adelaide, but the developer is yet to set a start date for the project.
The Planning Department has this month given the go-ahead for Stage One of the Buckland Park development, which would include almost 600 houses, a display village, supermarket, specialty shops and parks.

Buckland Park is about 35km from the Adelaide CBD, just north of St Kilda.
However, a start date for construction remains unclear, as developer Walker Corporation says it will not start ground works until all approvals have been granted. This ­includes endorsement from Playford Council and the ­department for the upgrade of an intersection at Port Wakefield and Angle Vale roads, at Buckland Park.
In a statement, Walker Corporation said it welcomed the government’s decision to approve Stage One of the development, named Riverlea.
“We are working closely with (the department) and the Playford Council on critical ­elements of the project, including the intersection on Port Wakefield Rd,” it said. "Significant capital works, (such as) moving 600,000 tonnes of soil, must get underway before construction gets under way on Stage One.”

Planning Minister John Rau said the department would help streamline the project’s delivery.
Mr Rau said the government’s newly-created position of state co-ordinator general, held by James Hallion, could help move the project forward.
The state co-ordinator general aims to cut red tape on private developments valued at $3 million or more by working with developers to overcome issues such as planning, environment, council regulations and water.
Under Walker Corporation’s plans, about 12,000 houses would be built at Riverlea over the next 25 years, providing accommodation for 30,000 people.
The comments on AdelaideNow sum up the situation well.
Jason
A satellite city 35km north of Adelaide? What a horrible idea. The last thing we need is more urban sprawl, when there is a clear need for greater density and far better transport options in inner suburban Adelaide.
Fred
There is no mention of the flooding problem and how they are going to solve it. If you buy in there, make sure you have a boat to get to work.
- This is clear proof that local knowledge (quite simply, the knowledge of the locals) was ignored during the public participation process, and instead 'experts' allowed to dominate feedback to government and decision-makers.
Ricardas
This is insanity. Politicians elected to represent our interests are allowing this pandering to lazy uncreative developers. We'll see the urban sprawl get worse and worse - and our roads will get more and more choked up whilst the quality of life goes down the toilet. It is high time such developments are stopped, and focus is placed on redevelopment and new development within the existing boundaries of greater Adelaide, where there is plenty of room (e.g. Port Adelaide anyone?). The best way to grow quality infrastructure (including decent public transport) is by having sufficient revenue density.

We should be trying to enhance our lives, not diminish them.

Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 8:12 am
by [Shuz]
Heaps disappointed with this outcome. Poor planning.

Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 6:30 pm
by ChillyPhilly
[Shuz] wrote:Heaps disappointed with this outcome. Poor planning.
It's not planning at all. This kind of garbage is the antithesis of 'planning'.

Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs

Posted: Wed Jul 30, 2014 11:36 pm
by PeFe
This really is depressing news.....satellite city?...wtf.....its will be just another suburb.
Did the SA government really not have the guts to say no to shit like this?
A suburb with no jobs....
A suburb with no public transport (and why should taxpayers fork out hard earned dollars for public transport to this out-of-the-way-wasteland!)
A suburb that is only being developed because it exists just outside the metro area boundary......
Bogan Hunters Series 5......... filmed entirely in.......

Re: Housing Developments | Northern Suburbs

Posted: Thu Jul 31, 2014 1:24 am
by ChillyPhilly
$$$$$$$$$$$$. It talks, alas. Sick of it.