News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

All high-rise, low-rise and street developments in the Adelaide and North Adelaide areas.
Message
Author
User avatar
omada
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 686
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 10:03 am
Location: Eden Hills

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2176 Post by omada » Thu Nov 15, 2012 9:00 am

Ben is right.

The closure is permanent and is part of the development of the Uni SA campus development.

We are also about to start work on making this section of Hindley St into a traffic-calmed shared zone with widened footpaths, new landscaping and street furniture. This will make a more unified public place linking the growing parts of the campus on either side of Hindley Street.

This is a Council project in partnership with the State Government and UniSA

David
Thanks David.

That's great news! And good to see some tangible action in light of all the recent reports and studies. Here's hoping the ACC and State Govt. ramp up these efforts.

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2177 Post by Wayno » Thu Nov 15, 2012 10:15 am

excellent.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

Adelarch
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:34 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2178 Post by Adelarch » Thu Nov 15, 2012 11:39 am

Sounds like a great initiative - I'm guessing this is broadly part of the Jan Gehl's public spaces and public life plan. Well done to Adelaide City Council and the State Government for having the guts to start implementing it.

mattblack
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2179 Post by mattblack » Wed Nov 21, 2012 12:09 pm

Really important new Smart Move Strategy released today by the council to direct how it will create and accessible and vibrant city over the next 10 years.

http://smartmoveadelaide.com.au/?utm_so ... =SmartMove

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2180 Post by Waewick » Thu Nov 22, 2012 8:25 am

is anyone else getting tired of the buzz word "vibrant"

I like the concept, but perhaps it is time to stop adding it to everything that happens in the city.....

(just to be sure, I am not having a crack at the ACC or their latest release)

mattblack
Legendary Member!
Posts: 1084
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 11:20 am

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2181 Post by mattblack » Thu Nov 22, 2012 9:29 am

Well you could say 'a city for people', 'a city of destinations', 'an active city', 'a accessible city', 'a socially inclusive city', 'a city of arts and culture', 'a city of events', 'a city of diversity', or even 'a city with multiple transport options'. Then again, you can just say 'a vibrant city'. Take your pick.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2182 Post by Waewick » Thu Nov 22, 2012 11:19 am

mattblack wrote:Well you could say 'a city for people', 'a city of destinations', 'an active city', 'a accessible city', 'a socially inclusive city', 'a city of arts and culture', 'a city of events', 'a city of diversity', or even 'a city with multiple transport options'. Then again, you can just say 'a vibrant city'. Take your pick.
I see what you are saying, but why do we even need to harp on about it ? ( and yes it could be seen as complaining for the sake of it. )

but is just seems to be dropped at every possible occasion. Don't get me wrong I'm not against the philosphy I'm just not sure the constant reminder of "vibrant" is required outside the actions of actually doing it.

User avatar
Ho Really
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 2715
Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2006 3:29 pm
Location: In your head

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2183 Post by Ho Really » Thu Nov 22, 2012 1:52 pm

The word vibrant reminds me of something that vibrates (and something that you need to shove somewhere). Does Adelaide really need something like that, something to give it a buzz? :shock:

How about just "a living city" (as opposed to being dead or defunct)?

Cheers

P.S. Noticed on the Visit Brisbane site, they use the motto "Australia's New World City".
Confucius say: Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

david
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2184 Post by david » Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:04 am

Notes from Cllr David Plumridge - Issue 87

- Extent of Poverty in Australia
- Coffee Shop Revolution
- Changing of the Guard
- Splash-taculaR event in Whitmore Square

Decisions of Council Meeting 27 November.
Notes from Councillor Issue 87a.pdf
(196.51 KiB) Downloaded 129 times
Cllr David Plumridge AM
Deputy Lord Mayor
Adelaide City Council

and yes, I am totally over the use of the word 'vibrant' .............!

User avatar
Wayno
VIP Member
VIP Member
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 2:18 pm
Location: Torrens Park

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2185 Post by Wayno » Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:30 am

This'll annoy many commuters, but personally i think it's a good idea. It'll drive PT usage up a notch i imagine...
CITY workers will soon be banned from parking all day on War Memorial Drive.

The City Council will introduce a four-hour time limit on War Memorial Drive, west of Montefiore Rd.

Councillors voted in favour of the move at a meeting this week to preserve parking spaces for people who use the parklands.

The council voted against introducing paid parking in the area.

Councillor David Plumridge told the meeting "parking in the parklands should primarily be reserved for people using the parklands".

Timed parking will be introduced once the road verge is gravelled and a pedestrian path created.

Until now there have been no parking controls and drivers often park across the width of the verge, forcing pedestrians to walk on the road.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work.

User avatar
Maximus
Legendary Member!
Posts: 630
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:05 pm
Location: The Bush Capital (Canberra)

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2186 Post by Maximus » Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:34 am

Wayno wrote:This'll annoy many commuters, but personally i think it's a good idea. It'll drive PT usage up a notch i imagine...
Lunch time's gonna be like musical chairs for cars! :wink:
It's = it is; its = everything else.
You're = you are; your = belongs to.
Than = comparative ("bigger than"); then = next.

david
High Rise Poster!
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:04 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2187 Post by david » Wed Dec 12, 2012 10:10 am

Notes from Councillor David Plumridge - Issue No 88

- The Year in Retrospect
- Planning - Park Lands - Precincts
- Decisions of Council Meeting 11 December 2013.
Notes from Councillor Issue 88.pdf
(149.16 KiB) Downloaded 135 times
With best wishes for the Festive Season to all my colleagues on Sensational Adelaide

Cllr David Plumridge
Adelaide City Council

Dvious
Legendary Member!
Posts: 641
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 11:46 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2188 Post by Dvious » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:03 am

We did not need such widespread relaxation of height limits, the dumping of proven quantitative measures and such a generous gift to the ‘here today, gone tomorrow’ developers as has been bestowed by catalyst sites. We neither need nor want developments of the scale of Sturt St and Claxton St. If these are the results of the Design Review Process and deliberations of the Development Assessment process the future of the city is indeed bleak.

Waewick
Super Size Scraper Poster!
Posts: 3774
Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 1:39 pm

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2189 Post by Waewick » Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:37 am

I'll ignore the height restriction debate the councillor as a person elected to represent people has the right to hold his opinion

I just attended the EUA meeting (Enviromental Upgrade Agreement) held by the council

these appear to be a very exciting development, especially in the Adelaide CBD where we have a lot of old stock ripe for improvement - is there a view that the council has in the timing for engagement?

I realise that there is a fair bit of water to go under the bridge, but it appears to be a move in the right direction (environmentally speaking)

crawf
Donating Member
Donating Member
Posts: 5527
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:49 pm
Location: Adelaide

Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council

#2190 Post by crawf » Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:37 pm

Dvious wrote:
We did not need such widespread relaxation of height limits, the dumping of proven quantitative measures and such a generous gift to the ‘here today, gone tomorrow’ developers as has been bestowed by catalyst sites. We neither need nor want developments of the scale of Sturt St and Claxton St. If these are the results of the Design Review Process and deliberations of the Development Assessment process the future of the city is indeed bleak.
In actual fact, Adelaide CBD's future has never looked so bright. With much of the thanks going to the State Government, who are treating the CBD as an actual CBD and not just another suburb. If people don't like hi-rises then don't bother living in the CBD area.
Last edited by crawf on Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests