Sensational-Adelaide.com

Ben is right.

The closure is permanent and is part of the development of the Uni SA campus development.

We are also about to start work on making this section of Hindley St into a traffic-calmed shared zone with widened footpaths, new landscaping and street furniture. This will make a more unified public place linking the growing parts of the campus on either side of Hindley Street.

This is a Council project in partnership with the State Government and UniSA

David

mattblack wrote:Well you could say 'a city for people', 'a city of destinations', 'an active city', 'a accessible city', 'a socially inclusive city', 'a city of arts and culture', 'a city of events', 'a city of diversity', or even 'a city with multiple transport options'. Then again, you can just say 'a vibrant city'. Take your pick.

CITY workers will soon be banned from parking all day on War Memorial Drive.

The City Council will introduce a four-hour time limit on War Memorial Drive, west of Montefiore Rd.

Councillors voted in favour of the move at a meeting this week to preserve parking spaces for people who use the parklands.

The council voted against introducing paid parking in the area.

Councillor David Plumridge told the meeting "parking in the parklands should primarily be reserved for people using the parklands".

Timed parking will be introduced once the road verge is gravelled and a pedestrian path created.

Until now there have been no parking controls and drivers often park across the width of the verge, forcing pedestrians to walk on the road.

Wayno wrote:This'll annoy many commuters, but personally i think it's a good idea. It'll drive PT usage up a notch i imagine...

We did not need such widespread relaxation of height limits, the dumping of proven quantitative measures and such a generous gift to the ‘here today, gone tomorrow’ developers as has been bestowed by catalyst sites. We neither need nor want developments of the scale of Sturt St and Claxton St. If these are the results of the Design Review Process and deliberations of the Development Assessment process the future of the city is indeed bleak.

Dvious wrote:

We did not need such widespread relaxation of height limits, the dumping of proven quantitative measures and such a generous gift to the ‘here today, gone tomorrow’ developers as has been bestowed by catalyst sites. We neither need nor want developments of the scale of Sturt St and Claxton St. If these are the results of the Design Review Process and deliberations of the Development Assessment process the future of the city is indeed bleak.