Page 16 of 32
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:12 pm
by Ben
Nort wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:11 pm
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:13 pm
CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like.
What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away?
Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly. The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I think most will be happy with it.
The king returns: Capture.JPG
The advertiser will think that's real again and it will be in tomorrows paper
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:03 pm
by CDJ
Nort wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:11 pm
The king returns: Capture.JPG
Hahahaha - I couldn't believe it when the Advertiser published that horrendous photoshop
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 6:04 pm
by Mpol02
Hahahaha honestly given some of the crap we’ve had, that old beast wouldn’t be that bad.
Thanks for clarifying. I guess with anything if it’s quality then it should look quite elevated either way.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:09 pm
by Jaymz
Exciting times!
So can someone please clarify regarding dwelling numbers. Does it mean 322 apartments plus 160 hotel rooms, or 322 including?
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:15 pm
by Ben
It is 322 plus hotel.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:38 pm
by VinyTapestry849
Nort wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 5:11 pm
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:13 pm
CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like.
What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away?
Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly. The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I think most will be happy with it.
The king returns: Capture.JPG
lmao nort
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:44 pm
by VinyTapestry849
Jaymz wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 7:09 pm
Exciting times!
So can someone please clarify regarding dwelling numbers. Does it mean 322 apartments plus 160 hotel rooms, or 322 including?
Apartment to purchase : 322
Hotel : 160
Total of 482 rooms of which humans reside in lol
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 8:55 pm
by VinyTapestry849
Here's a more accurate vision of what it looks like in comparison to other highrises in the city. Even when its been shortened to 180m, It'll be an absolute Beast!
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | ~195m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:07 pm
by ghs
HiTouch wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:16 am
Great to hear! I have no doubt this one will go up in current economic conditions! This road desperately needs a tram line
Mate, how do you define good economic conditions ?
The economy is a shambles.
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:44 pm
by aceman
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:30 pm
The difference between SA1 Tower and previous tall proposals for Adelaide is that in this case the work has actually been done with regard to aviation. Previous proposals have made no attempt to do so and therefore had no chance of ever being approved at DA stage. This is the first time we've had a real project in Adelaide which will achieve height greater than the Westpac antennae. (Realm and Adelaidean are lower than Westpac antennae, with respect to sea level, which is what matters for aviation).
when you say the work has been done with regard to aviation does that mean that it has already been approved by the aviation authorities?
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 10:01 pm
by CDJ
aceman wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:44 pm
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 2:30 pm
The difference between SA1 Tower and previous tall proposals for Adelaide is that in this case the work has actually been done with regard to aviation. Previous proposals have made no attempt to do so and therefore had no chance of ever being approved at DA stage. This is the first time we've had a real project in Adelaide which will achieve height greater than the Westpac antennae. (Realm and Adelaidean are lower than Westpac antennae, with respect to sea level, which is what matters for aviation).
when you say the work has been done with regard to aviation does that mean that it has already been approved by the aviation authorities?
All will be revealed shortly. The full submission will be public in the next day or two and that will answer your question
[CAN] Re: [PRO] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | ~195m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:46 pm
by citywatcher
ghs wrote:HiTouch wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 9:16 am
Great to hear! I have no doubt this one will go up in current economic conditions! This road desperately needs a tram line
Mate, how do you define good economic conditions ?
The economy is a shambles.
He probably means Vanguard will buy it for their new Super arm .
Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Tue Jan 18, 2022 11:55 pm
by Algernon
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:13 pm
CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like.
What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away?
Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly.
The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I think most will be happy with it.
It looks like a phone exchange and a tyre and auto?
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 12:41 am
by HiTouch
CDJ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:57 pm
Mpol02 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 18, 2022 4:13 pm
CDJ i assume you’ve seen what this looks like.
What are your thoughts on the design without giving much away?
Now that it's public, you'll get to see the renders shortly. The design is elegant and striking while also being sympathetic to the streetscape. JPE and Cox have done a brilliant job. I think most will be happy with it.
So it’ll have wind chimes and a tyre swing?
[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use
Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:02 am
by Ho Really
Was waiting for this news since December. CDJ gave us a hint for something then. A little disappointed not pushed to the 200 metre limit, but beggars can't be choosers. Anyhow back in December I put this image together to see what reaction it would get but never posted it. A bit of an anti climax now I guess. Anyhow let's enjoy the moment.
Cheers