Page 162 of 208

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:13 pm
by wilkiebarkid
Not sure if this has been posted before. From Maras Group website. Proposed 361-367 King William Street (corner of Sturt Street). 18 floors of offices over 4 levels of carparking.

Image

News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:44 pm
by cmet
wilkiebarkid wrote:Not sure if this has been posted before. From Maras Group website. Proposed 361-367 King William Street (corner of Sturt Street). 18 floors of offices over 4 levels of carparking.

Image
Has this been proposed/approved?

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 12:18 am
by Ho Really
cmet wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:44 pm
Has this been proposed/approved?
It's "in the pipeline" so probably still in the planning stage. It looks like approximately 85 metres in height.

Cheer's

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 12:49 am
by Algernon
Ho Really wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 12:18 am
cmet wrote:
Fri Jan 17, 2020 12:44 pm
Has this been proposed/approved?
It's "in the pipeline" so probably still in the planning stage. It looks like approximately 85 metres in height.

Cheer's
Looks to me more or less the height of Vue.

This would be a big step forwards for the canyonistion of King William St.

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 7:54 am
by ml69
That’s not really a great location for office space.

But superb for apartments.

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:01 pm
by NTRabbit
Image is gone, can anyone rehost it?

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:08 pm
by gnrc_louis
NTRabbit wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:01 pm
Image is gone, can anyone rehost it?
Picture here including further details about the building: https://www.marasgroup.com.au/our-prope ... -adelaide/

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:58 pm
by Jaymz
ml69 wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 7:54 am
That’s not really a great location for office space.

But superb for apartments.
Please explain why not a good location for office space?

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Sun Jan 19, 2020 7:37 am
by wilkiebarkid
NTRabbit wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:01 pm
Image is gone, can anyone rehost it?
Image

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:18 am
by ml69
Jaymz wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:58 pm
ml69 wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 7:54 am
That’s not really a great location for office space.

But superb for apartments.
Please explain why not a good location for office space?
Not a prime location if you were going to build 18 levels of office space. I know offices exist in the southern part of KW St, I’m just saying it’s not the best.

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 8:40 am
by Pikey
ml69 wrote:
Mon Jan 20, 2020 12:18 am
Jaymz wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 10:58 pm
ml69 wrote:
Sat Jan 18, 2020 7:54 am
That’s not really a great location for office space.

But superb for apartments.
Please explain why not a good location for office space?
Not a prime location if you were going to build 18 levels of office space. I know offices exist in the southern part of KW St, I’m just saying it’s not the best.
Actually prime space within proximity of the central CBD but not right within it is considered desirable. The definition of "prime" is very circumstantial. This spot is adjacent to public transport and includes on site parking. For the right client I'd say this is very desirable.

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:43 pm
by phenom
Having worked in 400KWS back when it was first built, most people found it very workable. The free tram right out front actually made meetings in the 'core' of the CBD easier to get to than it is for a lot of offices located, say, in the Hindmarsh Sq vicinity. I do think there are a number of businesses that absolutely do not need to be in the 'thick of things' but just close by, and it probably makes more sense to densify the southern part of the CBD instead of building more in places like Unley etc where the public transport infrastructure is pretty hopeless relatively speaking.

The only issue, if you can call it that, was that most of the visitors we had from interstate seemed to struggle with the idea they were in a (previously) residential part of the city and therefore couldn't seem to grasp why there were so few other shops and offices around... despite the core CBD being perfectly visible from the rather large windows in the near distance and many of them riding the free tram down to Haighs in their lunch break. I think it's because the Adelaide CBD is just so huge (for the population). If it was Perth or similar, that part of the CBD would have its own suburb name and be called 'South Adelaide' or something.

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 5:16 am
by ml69
phenom wrote:
Mon Jan 20, 2020 10:43 pm
Having worked in 400KWS back when it was first built, most people found it very workable. The free tram right out front actually made meetings in the 'core' of the CBD easier to get to than it is for a lot of offices located, say, in the Hindmarsh Sq vicinity. I do think there are a number of businesses that absolutely do not need to be in the 'thick of things' but just close by
Fair enough. I can understand how this would be workable.

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2020 12:28 pm
by gnrc_louis
“But one of the medium-term challenges for the Adelaide market is working out what to do with the 63 per cent of our building stock that is greater than 30 years old.”
From this article: https://indaily.com.au/news/business/20 ... ancy-rate/

Convert it into apartments like what Postcode 3000 did in Melbourne in the 90s, however with a particular emphasis on affordability to attract young people.

Re: News & Discussion: General CBD Development

Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:06 pm
by Llessur2002
gnrc_louis wrote:
Thu Feb 06, 2020 12:28 pm
“But one of the medium-term challenges for the Adelaide market is working out what to do with the 63 per cent of our building stock that is greater than 30 years old.”
From this article: https://indaily.com.au/news/business/20 ... ancy-rate/

Convert it into apartments like what Postcode 3000 did in Melbourne in the 90s, however with a particular emphasis on affordability to attract young people.
Especially in the case of the smaller heritage stock which is activated by retail on ground level but has only empty floors above. In Europe these would be apartments - this would help to activate areas such as Rundle Mall after hours.