Page 164 of 299

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Mon Nov 26, 2012 12:51 am
by Goya's Line
metro wrote:Why on earth do they have Victoria Shitter on the heritage scoreboard? :sly:
It's temporary signage as a sponsor of the series. Wonder if West End has any say in the amount of VB (or Coopers) served at the venue?

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:02 pm
by Paulns
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355387505.633395.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355387505.633395.jpg (226.26 KiB) Viewed 3522 times

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:04 pm
by Paulns
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355387585.132542.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355387585.132542.jpg (205.2 KiB) Viewed 3521 times
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355387622.499374.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355387622.499374.jpg (179.39 KiB) Viewed 3521 times
a

Making good progress!

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:33 pm
by Paulns
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355389381.590105.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355389381.590105.jpg (92.9 KiB) Viewed 3508 times

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:52 pm
by Paulns
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355397652.750990.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355397652.750990.jpg (175.34 KiB) Viewed 3460 times
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355397677.748207.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355397677.748207.jpg (93.13 KiB) Viewed 3460 times
When it's finished this ground's going to be awesome!

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:39 pm
by Paulns
They were even working during the game!
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355404120.678219.jpg
ImageUploadedByTapatalk1355404120.678219.jpg (175.34 KiB) Viewed 3439 times

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:50 am
by Wayno
no photos of the streaker? :lol:

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
by pafc1870
Old trees to be cut for Adelaide Oval car park

Image

THE ADELAIDE Oval redevelopment has claimed an avenue of historic century-old white cedar trees to make way for car parks.

The state's most powerful planning body has upheld a State Government push to axe the 105-year-old trees lining a pedestrian avenue north of the oval.

The Government asked the City Council for permission to fell the trees and rip up the bitumen path linking Pennington Tce with the oval. When the council refused, the Government appealed to the Development Assessment Commission (DAC) which ruled in its favour.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sout ... 6543786786

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:09 pm
by Stefan
cant they incorporate the trees into the car park?

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:10 pm
by pafc1870
Stefan wrote:cant they incorporate the trees into the car park?
you'd think so

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:33 pm
by ml69
Look how closely spaced the trees are and how low the branches are. I'm sure if there was a viable way they could have been incorporated, the designers would have done so given the sensitivity of even chopping down one tree in the parklands.

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2012 11:07 pm
by PeFe
Fuck the carpark...let people use public transport!

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 1:32 pm
by ghs
Adelaide city council is a joke.

Seriously why did they refuse to remove the trees ?

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 5:55 pm
by mooshie
Umm. Anyone notice those trees have no leaves on them in the middle of summer? Looks like the photo was taken recently given the piles of dirt

[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:21 pm
by monotonehell
Normally I'd be all "build the carpark around the trees." As I know these trees, I have parked cars around them many a time when I used to work at the Oval during my university days.

BUT

Are these the same "white cedar" that have been decalred a noxious weed in Australia? Hard to tell as several trees go by that name.