SBD wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2019 8:16 pm
rev wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2019 6:10 pm
United Airlines has released new routes, and has overlooked Adelaide. So no direct flights to the US yet.
Labor gov. were in talks with them, who knows what if anything the new Lib. gov did.
What combinations of US airport and aircraft can handle a fully-laden trip to Adelaide without a fuel stop on the way?
Adelaide airport to LAX is just over 13,000 km.
United flies into Sydney and Melbourne and AA & Delta fly into Sydney. LAX is a major hub for all three.
Hawaiian Airlines flies to Sydney and Brisbane. Distance between Sydney and Honolulu is nearly 8,200km, to Brisbane 7,500km. Adelaide to Honolulu is nearly 9,200km.
-United operate the Boeing 777-200ER which has a range of just over 13,000km, but they are replacing them with the Airbus A350-900, which has a range of 15,000km.
-American Airlines also operates the 777-200ER, but they are replacing theirs with the Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner, which has a range of 14,140 km. United also operates the 787-9. It also operates the Airbus A330-200 with a range of 13,450km.
-Delta operates the 777-200ER and the 777-200LR. The 777-200LR has a range of 17,395km. It has orders for the A350-900 as well. Delta operates the A330-200 as well.
-Hawaiian operates the Boeing 787-9 and the A330-200.
The Airbus A380 can fly 14,800km.
Passenger planes always have additional fuel but I don't know how much...do they need enough to fly 500km, or 2000km in case of emergency, diversion, or have to be in a holding pattern, or is that extra fuel factored into those max ranges stated.
Perth to London, which Qantas operates non-stop flights, is 14,491km.
Qantas is planning on Sydney & Melbourne non stop to London and New York next.
Sydney to New York is 16,003km, London 17,008km.
Melbourne to New York is 16,687km, London 16,918km.
Direct non stop Adelaide to LAX is doable technically. Whether it's profitable for airlines is another thing.