Sensational-Adelaide.com

Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/

207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=5991

Page 18 of 32

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 7:26 pm
by Ho Really
Ben wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 6:20 pm
 Before anyone asks. That is NOT the render.
That's the Advertiser trying to be smart as usual. Nothing new in the article. All that was to be said (the important stuff) was said by CDJ.

Cheers

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:27 pm
by HiTouch
ml69 wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 6:08 pm
 Lead story on adelaidenow.
E3E873B3-354A-4E41-BA2C-BC427472A32F.png
Whoever drew that is a fuckwit.

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 11:01 pm
by AG
Whoever predicted that The Advertiser would copy the story that was broken here on the forums was indeed correct! (and add incorrect renders/info in the process).

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 12:47 am
by Howie
So typical of the tiser - at least we give proper thanks to the people who source the information.

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Thu Jan 20, 2022 8:44 am
by VinyTapestry849
ml69 wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 6:08 pm
 Lead story on adelaidenow.
E3E873B3-354A-4E41-BA2C-BC427472A32F.png
Could someone post the SA1 Tower article from the Advertiser please?

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:57 pm
by Smithy84
I assume the ‘announcement’ referenced by CDJ is different than the laughable Tiser article and is still to come?

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:18 pm
by CDJ
Smithy84 wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:57 pm
 I assume the ‘announcement’ referenced by CDJ is different than the laughable Tiser article and is still to come?
That's correct! The Rupert Rag is just embellishing what's in the public lodgement notice. Render will be released when the client is ready. I had assumed a few days, but I think it's going to be a few weeks now.

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 4:04 pm
by Smithy84
CDJ wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:18 pm
Smithy84 wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:57 pm
 I assume the ‘announcement’ referenced by CDJ is different than the laughable Tiser article and is still to come?
That's correct! The Rupert Rag is just embellishing what's in the public lodgement notice. Render will be released when the client is ready. I had assumed a few days, but I think it's going to be a few weeks now.
No worries, thought so. Thanks mate

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2022 7:38 pm
by Algernon
CDJ wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 21, 2022 3:18 pm
Smithy84 wrote: ↑
Fri Jan 21, 2022 12:57 pm
 I assume the ‘announcement’ referenced by CDJ is different than the laughable Tiser article and is still to come?
That's correct! The Rupert Rag is just embellishing what's in the public lodgement notice. Render will be released when the client is ready. I had assumed a few days, but I think it's going to be a few weeks now.
Have to say that's a rookie move. The Advertiser is positively gormless. They'll make anything up and have people believing this building is a 300m tall squid threatening to steal your ambulances.

I met an Advertiser journo and he had this glassy eyed cult look. Genuinely wanted to sniff his own farts because he worked there.

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:48 pm
by brizzlar
Awesome news, can't wait to see the finished product.

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:50 pm
by brizzlar
VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:42 am
Ho Really wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:02 am
 Was waiting for this news since December. CDJ gave us a hint for something then. A little disappointed not pushed to the 200 metre limit, but beggars can't be choosers. Anyhow back in December I put this image together to see what reaction it would get but never posted it. A bit of an anti climax now I guess. Anyhow let's enjoy the moment.

Image

Cheers
But why are these (red/black lines) relevant when the actual flight paths are far north from these developments (shown below)
Great image.

Does anyone know if we're likely to see buildings get up to/past 200m or nah?

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 9:33 pm
by Nort
brizzlar wrote: ↑
Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:50 pm
VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:42 am
Ho Really wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:02 am
 Was waiting for this news since December. CDJ gave us a hint for something then. A little disappointed not pushed to the 200 metre limit, but beggars can't be choosers. Anyhow back in December I put this image together to see what reaction it would get but never posted it. A bit of an anti climax now I guess. Anyhow let's enjoy the moment.

Image

Cheers
But why are these (red/black lines) relevant when the actual flight paths are far north from these developments (shown below)
Great image.

Does anyone know if we're likely to see buildings get up to/past 200m or nah?
Yeah, there's a 350m proposal going around but no-one figured it was worth making a thread on.

[CAN] Re: [PRO] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 9:45 pm
by citywatcher
Nort wrote:
brizzlar wrote: ↑
Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:50 pm
VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:42 am
 But why are these (red/black lines) relevant when the actual flight paths are far north from these developments (shown below)
Great image.

Does anyone know if we're likely to see buildings get up to/past 200m or nah?
Yeah, there's a 350m proposal going around but no-one figured it was worth making a thread on.
Image

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk

[CAN] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 7:16 am
by brizzlar
Nort wrote: ↑
Mon Jan 24, 2022 9:33 pm
brizzlar wrote: ↑
Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:50 pm
VinyTapestry849 wrote: ↑
Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:42 am

But why are these (red/black lines) relevant when the actual flight paths are far north from these developments (shown below)
Great image.

Does anyone know if we're likely to see buildings get up to/past 200m or nah?
Yeah, there's a 350m proposal going around but no-one figured it was worth making a thread on.
Yeah that's fair, 350m isn't that big a deal these days with the 1K+ towers on the cards abroad.

[CAN] Re: [PRO] Re: 207 Pulteney Street | 180m | 55 Levels | Mixed Use

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2022 7:51 am
by Mpol02
citywatcher wrote: ↑
Mon Jan 24, 2022 9:45 pm
Nort wrote:
brizzlar wrote: ↑
Mon Jan 24, 2022 5:50 pm

Great image.

Does anyone know if we're likely to see buildings get up to/past 200m or nah?
Yeah, there's a 350m proposal going around but no-one figured it was worth making a thread on.
Image

Sent from my SM-A515F using Tapatalk
When was this?? I can see the image alas
All times are UTC+10:30
Page 18 of 32
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited
https://www.phpbb.com/