Page 194 of 299
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:42 pm
by Shahkar
bretthandorf wrote:had a flight back from Melbourne yesterday and when coming in to land had a good view of the oval. Overheard the person next to me say to their friend/parter/whatever that they can't wait to come over and see a footy match. Good to see that people from interstate are excited as well!
Wonder how many jokes they'll make about not having a northern stand
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:18 pm
by SRW
Shahkar wrote:bretthandorf wrote:had a flight back from Melbourne yesterday and when coming in to land had a good view of the oval. Overheard the person next to me say to their friend/parter/whatever that they can't wait to come over and see a footy match. Good to see that people from interstate are excited as well!
Wonder how many jokes they'll make about not having a northern stand
FFS. Cannot a single positive post go unsullied?
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:28 pm
by Matt
YAWN
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Tue Jun 18, 2013 11:14 pm
by Shahkar
Jesus, have a sense of humour people
I'm picking on some previous posts.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 12:32 pm
by Port Adelaide Fan
Adam Hannon from Cox Architects takes us on a tour of Adelaide Oval Redevelopment.
http://www.theplan.net.au/?p=3009
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Thu Jun 20, 2013 4:34 pm
by believesinadsy
Great first shot with the panoramic view of the city from the back of the Southern Stand. Undercuts previous opinions on the view being interrupted by that beautiful old red gum(s).
Cheers,
Chris
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:27 am
by mattblack
That is taken from the very top of the stand not the dining room which is a fair bit below that level. Either way it gives a beautiful perspective of our city.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 3:57 pm
by bretthandorf
Looks like theres going to be a mix of teal and red seats. Good to see that they're not going all out teal
- Screen Shot 2013-06-21 at 3.46.30 PM.png (907.73 KiB) Viewed 3490 times
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 4:01 pm
by Matt
Where's that pic from?
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:17 pm
by SRW
I'm glad that they won't all be teal, because I always thought it was ill-suited, but good grief what a colour combination! They obviously haven't got a set aesthetic that they're working towards.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Fri Jun 21, 2013 6:31 pm
by bretthandorf
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 11:01 am
by ghs
The colour combination with the seats is pretty good as far as I am concerned.
Could be a lot worse - look at the Gabba for example. Ridiculous,
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 11:05 am
by ghs
ghs wrote:The colour combination with the seats is pretty good as far as I am concerned.
Could be a lot worse - look at the Gabba for example. Ridiculous.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 10:46 am
by JamesXander
the Gabba would have to the ugliest oval in Australia, simply because of their seat colour choice. Shows how important it is to get it right.
[COM] Re: U/C: Adelaide Oval Redevelopment | 53,500 | $545m
Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 5:10 pm
by Matt
JamesXander wrote:the Gabba would have to the ugliest oval in Australia, simply because of their seat colour choice. Shows how important it is to get it right.
I think there's a lot more about the Gabba that's ugly myself. Horrible, horrible venue.
One big uniform concrete bowl.
So glad that Adelaide Oval is split into three separate and unique stands, rather than one continuous structure.