I was in Rundle St with the family for a couple of hours today. Also when to Rymill Lake to play with my remote-control boat (under the pretence of the boat being entertaining for my child!)
Had a great time, wandered up/down looking at the various stalls. Bumped into some friends and we stopped for a coffee/chat. Went into the "Chocolat" shop and spent $1.80 on a little pleasure - mmmm fattening! We also took the time to talk with several stall owners - it was interesting learning about the background on the products they are selling - a couple of stall owners were very surprised by our 'gregariousness' (if that's a word), and took the opportunity to really get into the conversation
So back to the upgrade: Having visited and looked at the street with fresh eyes, i'm now more in favour of a true shared space, and less in favour of removing cars altogether from the street. sure, pave the road, remove the firm "gutter boundary" between road/pavement, reduce the speed limit to 5km/h, and on occasion close the road to traffic altogether, but as a rule keep access open for
all forms of transport (including 'hover boards'). Consider it a social experiment - it will force 'cultural change' on the people who use the space, and who knows - it might even catch on and be applied elsewhere in the city. A 5km/h limit will remove "through traffic" from Rundle St, which is a good result in itself. And of course it's easy to go the extra step and eliminate cars altogether if the experiment fails.