[COM] 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Ibis Hotel
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
the best opinion one can have is one that is dynamic to the facts.
no point having an opinion which is factually incorrect.(if it is the case in this situation)
in terms of the small building next to this development, one day in 50 or 60 years (perhaps more)
someone will somehow make it viable.
no point having an opinion which is factually incorrect.(if it is the case in this situation)
in terms of the small building next to this development, one day in 50 or 60 years (perhaps more)
someone will somehow make it viable.
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
Indeed.Waewick wrote:the best opinion one can have is one that is dynamic to the facts.
no point having an opinion which is factually incorrect.(if it is the case in this situation).
If they do, I hope they manage to keep that little art deco facade (unlikely, I know...)Waewick wrote:in terms of the small building next to this development, one day in 50 or 60 years (perhaps more)
someone will somehow make it viable.
cheers,
Rhino
Rhino
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
Oh come now people, most members did not shed a tear at the demise of the heritage buildings that were razed to make way for this lovely piece of architecture. So no complaining now, you have what you wanted.
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
I can't really work out what people are complaining about (I don't see a blank wall in those pictures) but your argument is still fallacious.omada wrote:Oh come now people, most members did not shed a tear at the demise of the heritage buildings that were razed to make way for this lovely piece of architecture. So no complaining now, you have what you wanted.
Allowing the development, and wanting the development to be of architectural merit are two different issues, so there is no need to tut tut the board members who seek development in the Adelaide CBD.
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
What do you think this is? A bowl of goldfish?Waewick wrote:I can't really work out what people are complaining about (I don't see a blank wall in those pictures) but your argument is still fallacious.omada wrote:Oh come now people, most members did not shed a tear at the demise of the heritage buildings that were razed to make way for this lovely piece of architecture. So no complaining now, you have what you wanted.
Allowing the development, and wanting the development to be of architectural merit are two different issues, so there is no need to tut tut the board members who seek development in the Adelaide CBD.
That is two extremely large blank walls on the western side.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
Because I am sometimes pro-heritage/pro-activated laneways does not mean I am anti-development Waewick. I am just seeking appropriate development, not development at-all-costs. But, now that we have the building, and at such a cost, it had better be worth it.Waewick: I can't really work out what people are complaining about (I don't see a blank wall in those pictures) but your argument is still fallacious.
Allowing the development, and wanting the development to be of architectural merit are two different issues, so there is no need to tut tut the board members who seek development in the Adelaide CBD.
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
[Shuz] wrote:What do you think this is? A bowl of goldfish? ...
Pikey wrote:Aclupanel segments and dark glass isn't a blank wall.
cheers,
Rhino
Rhino
- monotonehell
- VIP Member
- Posts: 5466
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:10 am
- Location: Adelaide, East End.
- Contact:
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
On my monitor it looks like half a wall of an interesting glass veil over windows and the other half covered in an interesting architectural treatment.[Shuz] wrote:What do you think this is? A bowl of goldfish? ... That is two extremely large blank walls on the western side.
Maybe you need to adjust your monitor settings?
Exit on the right in the direction of travel.
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
We will have to wait and see until it's complete then.
Any views and opinions expressed are of my own, and do not reflect the views or opinions of any organisation of which I have an affiliation with.
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
I guess we will shuz, honestly that doesn't look to bad to me.
- skyliner
- Super Size Scraper Poster!
- Posts: 2359
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 9:16 pm
- Location: fassifern (near Brisbane)
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
same here.
ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
ADELAIDE - TOWARDS A GREATER CITY SKYLINE
Jack.
[COM] Re: SWP: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Hotel
if it is dark glass panelling, fair enough. but judging by the shadow from the arcade dome on the wall in question, i'd say it is fair enough for any lay person to assume that it was rendered cement or something similar.
[COM] Re: U/C: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Ibis Hotel
Press release from Watpac today. Tower crane to be up shortly according to announcement.
"Work commences on Australia's largest Ibis hotel"
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130227/p ... 26fhms.pdf
"Work commences on Australia's largest Ibis hotel"
http://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20130227/p ... 26fhms.pdf
[COM] Re: U/C: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Ibis Hotel
Seems like we need more hotel accommodation in Adelaide in March.
This weekend there was a shortage with Soundwave and the Clipsal 500 on at the same
time. Apparently some of the bands performing at Soundwave were forced to fly straight
to Perth after the event here because there was no accommodation available.
This weekend there was a shortage with Soundwave and the Clipsal 500 on at the same
time. Apparently some of the bands performing at Soundwave were forced to fly straight
to Perth after the event here because there was no accommodation available.
[COM] Re: U/C: 122 Grenfell Street | 59m | 17lvls | Ibis Hotel
or maybe organisers could plan to have large events on different weekends throughout the year?ghs wrote:Seems like we need more hotel accommodation in Adelaide in March.
This weekend there was a shortage with Soundwave and the Clipsal 500 on at the same
time. Apparently some of the bands performing at Soundwave were forced to fly straight
to Perth after the event here because there was no accommodation available.
i dont want to stereotype here, but i would say that a lot of people who went to the clipsal would be metallica fans, who headlined soundwave.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests