Re: News & Discussion: Adelaide City Council
Posted: Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:03 pm
I think that would be a great idea.
Adelaide's Premier Development and Construction Site
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/
https://mail.sensational-adelaide.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=451
Knoll shoots down council bid to reclaim planning powers
11 April 2018
Bension Siebert
New Planning Minister Stephan Knoll has pre-emptively rejected an Adelaide City Council bid to reclaim its major planning powers.
The council lost its rights to advise on major developments in the CBD and North Adelaide in 2013, when then-Planning Minister John Rau dropped the maximum value of projects under its remit to $10 million.
Late last year, Lord Mayor Martin Haese wrote to Rau, asking for that threshold to be raised – but he received no response.
Haese told last night’s council meeting he had “enthusiastically, vigorously” pursued the matter with Rau and that he would launch a new bid to regain the council’s planning powers now that South Australia has a new government and a new Minister for Planning.
But Knoll told InDaily before yesterday’s meeting that the government had no intention of giving the council its old powers back.
“The State Government has no plans to amend the current city planning framework at this stage,” he said in a statement.
A spokesperson for his office confirmed this meant that the Government would not be returning planning powers to the city council.
Knoll added, however, that: “We will be working constructively with the Adelaide City Council and other stakeholders to streamline our planning processes and drive more investment into our city.”
Haese told InDaily this afternoon that he believed the Government might still reconsider.
“Following Council endorsement … in October last year, I raised these matters with the previous Minister for Planning, John Rau,” he said.
“I believe there is an opportunity for these matters to be reassessed and I look forward to discussing them soon with the new Minister for Planning.”
Area councillor Anne Moran spearheaded last year’s push and attempted to renew it last night (but her motion was deemed too similar to last year’s motion asking for the Capital City Committee to discuss the issue with the Planning Minister – a motion that remains in force).
She told InDaily this morning that the current planning framework was not good for the city.
Moran urged Knoll to reconsider and said she hoped the council could establish a more fruitful relationship with the Marshall Government on planning than it had with the Weatherill Government.
“The developers don’t like going through the government’s assessment (processes) anymore,” she told InDaily.
“Our (development assessment process) is probably a little too ‘yes/no’ and simplistic; theirs (the Government’s) has been bogged down in peer review.
“We need to work together.”
She added: “This isn’t just a ‘give us back our powers, you bastards’.”
“I’d ask him (Knoll) to look at what we’re proposing again.
“He shouldn’t say no to you (the media) before he’s spoken to us.”
Moran’s motion suggested that the Capital City Committee ask the Planning Minister to consider four options:
- Restoring council powers over all development in the City of Adelaide.
- Raising the $10 million limit to $40 million.
- Changing the “trigger” for development assessment, from dollar value to floor space of 25,000sqm.
- Establishing a joint City of Adelaide and State Planning Assessment panel.
She said she wouldn’t have expected the new Government to agree to a wholesale return of planning powers to the council, but she hoped it would consider the latter three options seriously.
“Three our to the four things that I put up still give the state power over the big stuff,” she said.
She argued that the council was effectively assessing less and less valuable development every year because of inflation – a situation that did not work for either level of government.
“It isn’t fair, the current situation,” she added.
Knoll told a press conference today that the Liberal Party would continue with the former Government’s broader planning reforms, which he said would give developers “certainty”.
In my experience "car first and mostly only choice people" are so selfish. The roads exist only for them and everything else on the road is an unnecessary impediment. They are always the most vocal opponents to spending any money on Public Transport infrastructure even though the evidence shows that the only way to reduce congestion is to remove cars from the network by giving people viable alternatives to driving every single time. They just cant see that it is they themselves in their single occupant cars that cause congestion, not bus and bike lanes.mshagg wrote: ↑Sat Apr 28, 2018 12:42 amWow, Haese is on fire in the past 24 hours.
Big thumbs up to Bryan who pipes up and complains that single occupant vehicles arent adequately catered for in the CBD:
https://www.facebook.com/27863282900438 ... =3&theater
Then a Grade-A whinge about a few lights on the Torrens footbridge:
https://www.facebook.com/27863282900438 ... 634810600/
Because Council has articulated such a clear vision for the space...
Wow i'm impressed! That's actually pretty progressive policy.by SRW » Wed Jul 18, 2018 1:17 pm
Latest policy endeavour of the council for city developments is to require qualified architects to have prepared every proposal. Apparently Australia is unusual in not mandating architectural involvement, so Adelaide would be setting a standard nationally. some weird comments from stakeholders in the article though. See over here.
From: https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/messenge ... 96ba4bba86Proposal for Adelaide City Council to remove crossing east of Pirie and King William St intersection
AN opinion-dividing pedestrian crossing on a busy CBD street would be scrapped in an attempt to stop traffic bottlenecks, under a proposal to be put to the Adelaide City Council.
The zebra crossing at Pirie St, just east of the intersection with King William St, has split opinion ever since it was installed in 2013 — marking a return to pedestrian crossings in the CBD for the first time since the 1970s.
Its installation drew criticism from some for banking up traffic, while others said it provided a safe point for thousands of city workers and pedestrians. But the crossing could soon be no more if a proposal to be heard by the Adelaide City Council next week gets up.
Councillor Alex Antic has proposed that the zebra crossing be scrapped, saying it was creating a “Pirie St bottleneck”.
“This is essentially a relic of the 2012 Smart Move policy,” he said.
“When there is a very workable set of traffic lights just 10m away, I don’t think it is required.
“At peak times it is causing traffic to bank up back to Gawler Place, and anyone predicting the death of the motor vehicle is very wrong and whatever form they are in be they electric or hydrogen, they will still be an important part of our city.”
Cr Antic said he was not sure whether his fellow elected members would support his push, saying he predicted an interesting debate on the issue.
While zebra crossings are present at low speed areas such as carparks and Adelaide Airport, the Pirie St one has failed to encourage a raft of installations around the city.
Former Adelaide Lord Mayor Stephen Yarwood, who said it was his “pet project” having lobbied the State Government to get it, said removing the crossing made no sense.
You’d think cars voted the way he acts sometimesChillyPhilly wrote:Antic the car addict.