Page 244 of 340

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2018 8:32 pm
by rubberman
LanewayMapper wrote:
Mon Oct 01, 2018 5:00 pm
rubberman wrote:
Mon Oct 01, 2018 6:38 am
The Scooter Guy wrote:
Sun Sep 30, 2018 9:40 pm


Magic Mirror on the wall, when will the new extension be open to all?
Thank you for calling magic mirror prediction services, all our consultants are busy in Sydney right now. Your call is important to us, and you have been placed in a queue until one of our friendly staff can deal with you.

Cue to endless loop of "Time Passages by Al Stewart" in the background
I've heard from people in the know that the odds are looking better for services commencing before the end of the year rather than in the new year.
I was hoping for next week sometime. I mean, honestly, wha is there left to do. At least some explanation might give us hope they know what is wrong and are fixing it.

When a project goes bad, the worst thing an organisation can do is cut off 8nformation to the public. That's a vacuum that gets filled with rumours very easily.

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:04 pm
by aaronjameslange
The original brocure had stated that trams would be operational by 'late first quarter 2018'
Lets hope its late 2018 and not first quarter 2019

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:17 am
by Eurostar
aaronjameslange wrote:
Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:04 pm
The original brocure had stated that trams would be operational by 'late first quarter 2018'
Lets hope its late 2018 and not first quarter 2019
I can't remember the extension from Victoria Square to Lion Arts Centre having any issues, what's changed ?

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:50 am
by claybro
Eurostar wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:17 am
aaronjameslange wrote:
Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:04 pm
The original brocure had stated that trams would be operational by 'late first quarter 2018'
Lets hope its late 2018 and not first quarter 2019
I can't remember the extension from Victoria Square to Lion Arts Centre having any issues, what's changed ?
Personnel in the DPTI. Remembering when Vic Sq to North Terrace was constructed it was not competing with simultaneous Gold Coast, Sydney and Canberra light rail projects. It would seem there is not the expertise to go around, and Adelaide tiny little extension is no match for the employment prospects of the much larger projects interstate. That is why it would have been prudent for the former government to set up a pipeline of tram construction ongoing, instead of the isolated piece by piece extensions, so those experts and consultants were less likely to be poached.

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:33 pm
by rubberman
There's apparently a new head of Transport here in SA.

See the following link for a bit of background. John Radcliffe's linkedin summary is informative.

https://tdu.to/messages.aspx

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:46 pm
by rev
claybro wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:50 am
Eurostar wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:17 am
aaronjameslange wrote:
Mon Oct 01, 2018 10:04 pm
The original brocure had stated that trams would be operational by 'late first quarter 2018'
Lets hope its late 2018 and not first quarter 2019
I can't remember the extension from Victoria Square to Lion Arts Centre having any issues, what's changed ?
Personnel in the DPTI. Remembering when Vic Sq to North Terrace was constructed it was not competing with simultaneous Gold Coast, Sydney and Canberra light rail projects. It would seem there is not the expertise to go around, and Adelaide tiny little extension is no match for the employment prospects of the much larger projects interstate. That is why it would have been prudent for the former government to set up a pipeline of tram construction ongoing, instead of the isolated piece by piece extensions, so those experts and consultants were less likely to be poached.
Have they started the build in Parramatta yet? Stage One is just over 12km in length...compare that to our pitiful little extensions every now and then.
How long have many of us on here been saying they should have just bit the bullet and done massive extensions? Now we have the Liberals in government, which was inevitable after so long of Labor being in government...and now any likelihood of further extensions are basically zilch. Although some on here will still kid them selves that Marshall and Lucas will do more extensions.

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:59 pm
by rubberman
rev wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:46 pm
claybro wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:50 am
Eurostar wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 9:17 am


I can't remember the extension from Victoria Square to Lion Arts Centre having any issues, what's changed ?
Personnel in the DPTI. Remembering when Vic Sq to North Terrace was constructed it was not competing with simultaneous Gold Coast, Sydney and Canberra light rail projects. It would seem there is not the expertise to go around, and Adelaide tiny little extension is no match for the employment prospects of the much larger projects interstate. That is why it would have been prudent for the former government to set up a pipeline of tram construction ongoing, instead of the isolated piece by piece extensions, so those experts and consultants were less likely to be poached.
Have they started the build in Parramatta yet? Stage One is just over 12km in length...compare that to our pitiful little extensions every now and then.
How long have many of us on here been saying they should have just bit the bullet and done massive extensions? Now we have the Liberals in government, which was inevitable after so long of Labor being in government...and now any likelihood of further extensions are basically zilch. Although some on here will still kid them selves that Marshall and Lucas will do more extensions.
Those other states have more money. SA lost about $4.5bn in the State Bank disaster, and about $2bn so far from the privatisation of ETSA...and that is ongoing.

That $6.5bn, so far, would have funded a modest tram system, suburban and regional road upgrades and a city loop. The whole point of loss is that you simply can't plough on and spend as if it doesn't exist. Other states can do the things they have, because they didn't blow the money.

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 4:34 pm
by claybro
rubberman wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:59 pm
rev wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:46 pm
claybro wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:50 am


Personnel in the DPTI. Remembering when Vic Sq to North Terrace was constructed it was not competing with simultaneous Gold Coast, Sydney and Canberra light rail projects. It would seem there is not the expertise to go around, and Adelaide tiny little extension is no match for the employment prospects of the much larger projects interstate. That is why it would have been prudent for the former government to set up a pipeline of tram construction ongoing, instead of the isolated piece by piece extensions, so those experts and consultants were less likely to be poached.
Have they started the build in Parramatta yet? Stage One is just over 12km in length...compare that to our pitiful little extensions every now and then.
How long have many of us on here been saying they should have just bit the bullet and done massive extensions? Now we have the Liberals in government, which was inevitable after so long of Labor being in government...and now any likelihood of further extensions are basically zilch. Although some on here will still kid them selves that Marshall and Lucas will do more extensions.
Those other states have more money. SA lost about $4.5bn in the State Bank disaster, and about $2bn so far from the privatisation of ETSA...and that is ongoing.

That $6.5bn, so far, would have funded a modest tram system, suburban and regional road upgrades and a city loop. The whole point of loss is that you simply can't plough on and spend as if it doesn't exist. Other states can do the things they have, because they didn't blow the money.
It would not have been necessary to fund the whole system upfront. It has taken about what, 18 months for each extension? If the former government had kept funds rolling at about 50 million per year (not an insurmountable sum in the scheme of things) and followed on the Hindmarsh extension immediately after North Terrace West, then commenced immediately the East end extension, and had already commenced the Section to Adelaide Oval/ North Adelaide, etc then the momentum and expertise would have been maintained (or accelerated), and costs most probably reduced due to the increased scale. Federal funding would also have been more likely as is evident from the other states whos rail projects have also received Federal funding even when not strictly economically stacking up.

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:18 pm
by rubberman
claybro wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 4:34 pm
rubberman wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:59 pm
rev wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:46 pm


Have they started the build in Parramatta yet? Stage One is just over 12km in length...compare that to our pitiful little extensions every now and then.
How long have many of us on here been saying they should have just bit the bullet and done massive extensions? Now we have the Liberals in government, which was inevitable after so long of Labor being in government...and now any likelihood of further extensions are basically zilch. Although some on here will still kid them selves that Marshall and Lucas will do more extensions.
Those other states have more money. SA lost about $4.5bn in the State Bank disaster, and about $2bn so far from the privatisation of ETSA...and that is ongoing.

That $6.5bn, so far, would have funded a modest tram system, suburban and regional road upgrades and a city loop. The whole point of loss is that you simply can't plough on and spend as if it doesn't exist. Other states can do the things they have, because they didn't blow the money.
It would not have been necessary to fund the whole system upfront. It has taken about what, 18 months for each extension? If the former government had kept funds rolling at about 50 million per year (not an insurmountable sum in the scheme of things) and followed on the Hindmarsh extension immediately after North Terrace West, then commenced immediately the East end extension, and had already commenced the Section to Adelaide Oval/ North Adelaide, etc then the momentum and expertise would have been maintained (or accelerated), and costs most probably reduced due to the increased scale. Federal funding would also have been more likely as is evident from the other states whos rail projects have also received Federal funding even when not strictly economically stacking up.
Not disagreeing particularly. I mean, after all, that's the way they've been upgrading South Road until seven or eight years ago. However, if you have the money, doing the whole system in one series of big contracts is far cheaper. As an example, extension to Adelaide Oval, or extension along Colley Terrace would require an extra tram. If that's all that's being done, how do you choose the best tram? It may be that Bombardier might build an extra for SA. But don't bet on it. It may be we could get more Citadis, but that's simply a very uneconomic proposition, considering the damage they do. However, if we were ordering fifty new trams, then we'd have Stadler, Škoda, Pesa, Bombardier competing, AND with a good chance that a lot of the work could be done in SA.

However, I do agree with you for the short term. I am on record as supporting the Shuz Plan, which is what you suggest, but with lots more detail. However, the idea of doing short extensions is to build up local expertise. That means getting people in from Melbourne, and overseas, and trying different track laying techniques, and critically looking at existing standards. For example, use of combined bus and tram stops is common in cities in Europe, but not in Melbourne. That's huge. Many cities have grass track like Victoria Square, but with much cheaper construction techniques. Doing short extensions for a few years using different techniques makes sense in the sorely needed planning and capability building phase, but once that's past, economies of scale take over.

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:33 pm
by rev
rubberman wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:59 pm
rev wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:46 pm
claybro wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 10:50 am


Personnel in the DPTI. Remembering when Vic Sq to North Terrace was constructed it was not competing with simultaneous Gold Coast, Sydney and Canberra light rail projects. It would seem there is not the expertise to go around, and Adelaide tiny little extension is no match for the employment prospects of the much larger projects interstate. That is why it would have been prudent for the former government to set up a pipeline of tram construction ongoing, instead of the isolated piece by piece extensions, so those experts and consultants were less likely to be poached.
Have they started the build in Parramatta yet? Stage One is just over 12km in length...compare that to our pitiful little extensions every now and then.
How long have many of us on here been saying they should have just bit the bullet and done massive extensions? Now we have the Liberals in government, which was inevitable after so long of Labor being in government...and now any likelihood of further extensions are basically zilch. Although some on here will still kid them selves that Marshall and Lucas will do more extensions.
Those other states have more money. SA lost about $4.5bn in the State Bank disaster, and about $2bn so far from the privatization of ETSA...and that is ongoing.

That $6.5bn, so far, would have funded a modest tram system, suburban and regional road upgrades and a city loop. The whole point of loss is that you simply can't plough on and spend as if it doesn't exist. Other states can do the things they have, because they didn't blow the money.
That was nearly 30 years ago. When will it cease being used as an excuse for why this state is lagging so far behind the rest of the major states/capitals?

The state government lost money due to privatization? That would surely be a first..usually privatization of state assets and utilities ends in a one off increase in revenue, usually in the billions. But you reckon we apparently lost money? Hmm.

Other states are undertaking the major infrastructure projects they are by utilizing the funds from privatization(if there's anything left to privatize), or by borrowing the money. It's how our western world works. Credit/Debt. Victoria is proposing a $50 billion rail loop through the suburbs bypassing the CBD. Most of that will be borrowed money, if not all of it.

We had those massively blown out of proportion traffic delays, we now have these huge issues with when it's going to be open, when its' going to be safe for the public to use, and the cost blow outs. And when it's all done and dusted, for what...? That little extension..
Sure they're having issues in NSW too. But at least when it's all sorted out there, they'll have something substantial built.

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2018 6:16 pm
by rubberman
rev wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 5:33 pm
rubberman wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:59 pm
rev wrote:
Tue Oct 02, 2018 3:46 pm


Have they started the build in Parramatta yet? Stage One is just over 12km in length...compare that to our pitiful little extensions every now and then.
How long have many of us on here been saying they should have just bit the bullet and done massive extensions? Now we have the Liberals in government, which was inevitable after so long of Labor being in government...and now any likelihood of further extensions are basically zilch. Although some on here will still kid them selves that Marshall and Lucas will do more extensions.
Those other states have more money. SA lost about $4.5bn in the State Bank disaster, and about $2bn so far from the privatization of ETSA...and that is ongoing.

That $6.5bn, so far, would have funded a modest tram system, suburban and regional road upgrades and a city loop. The whole point of loss is that you simply can't plough on and spend as if it doesn't exist. Other states can do the things they have, because they didn't blow the money.
That was nearly 30 years ago. When will it cease being used as an excuse for why this state is lagging so far behind the rest of the major states/capitals?

The state government lost money due to privatization? That would surely be a first..usually privatization of state assets and utilities ends in a one off increase in revenue, usually in the billions. But you reckon we apparently lost money? Hmm.

Other states are undertaking the major infrastructure projects they are by utilizing the funds from privatization(if there's anything left to privatize), or by borrowing the money. It's how our western world works. Credit/Debt. Victoria is proposing a $50 billion rail loop through the suburbs bypassing the CBD. Most of that will be borrowed money, if not all of it.

We had those massively blown out of proportion traffic delays, we now have these huge issues with when it's going to be open, when its' going to be safe for the public to use, and the cost blow outs. And when it's all done and dusted, for what...? That little extension..
Sure they're having issues in NSW too. But at least when it's all sorted out there, they'll have something substantial built.
The answer is, possibly another thirty or forty years. There's two reasons. First is that if you have $6bn, there's an income stream from that by itself that funds stuff. Then, there's a big ongoing loss from the infrastructure that hasn't been built. If South Road had been upgraded totally in the 90s, we wouldn't be spending money now on T2T and the next stage. Those backlogs just keep rolling forward.

Just think, if South Road had been upgraded in the 90s, we wouldn't be doing that now, and that money would be being spent on the trams. If the resleepering of the system ($2.7bn iirc) had been done in the late 90s, then the money we spent recently would go most of the way to the city loop. In the late 1800s, the SA Railways almost bankrupted the State building lines to places that were totally uneconomic. That then crippled the ability to modernise until Webb came along, but it was decades later, and his intervention almost bankrupted the place. At least his improvements made sense.

Edit.The loss of money from ETSA. First, ETSA returned a net profit. That net profit was a forever revenue stream. Next, prices have skyrocketed. If the companies are private, those companies get the loot. Those State governments with power assets have also raised prices, but, they get the loot. This money in the State's pockets is one of the sources of money for big capital projects. SA gets zilch.

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 2:07 pm
by timtam20292
Dear Stakeholder

Thank you for your interest in the City Tram Extension Project. We write to notify you of upcoming kerb works in front of Ayres House, on North Terrace, as part of the City Tram Extension.

Day and night works will commence on Sunday, 7 October 2018 and are expected to be completed within a week, weather permitting. There will be no works on Friday or Saturday (5-6 October).

Lane and speed restrictions will be in place in the vicinity of the works. Two lanes will be maintained for west bound traffic in front of Ayres House. A 40km/h speed restriction will be in place whilst works are undertaken. Signage and traffic management will advise motorists of changed conditions.

Access to businesses and properties will be maintained.

Thank you for your continued interest in the City Tram Extension Project. For more information on the City Tram Extension Project please visit www.citytramextension.sa.gov.au, call the enquiry line on 1300 030 919 or email [email protected].

Regards

Stakeholder and Community Engagement Team

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:57 pm
by citywatcher
timtam20292 wrote:
Dear Stakeholder

Thank you for your interest in the City Tram Extension Project. We write to notify you of upcoming kerb works in front of Ayres House, on North Terrace, as part of the City Tram Extension.

Day and night works will commence on Sunday, 7 October 2018 and are expected to be completed within a week, weather permitting. There will be no works on Friday or Saturday (5-6 October).

Lane and speed restrictions will be in place in the vicinity of the works. Two lanes will be maintained for west bound traffic in front of Ayres House. A 40km/h speed restriction will be in place whilst works are undertaken. Signage and traffic management will advise motorists of changed conditions.

Access to businesses and properties will be maintained.

Thank you for your continued interest in the City Tram Extension Project. For more information on the City Tram Extension Project please visit www.citytramextension.sa.gov.au, call the enquiry line on 1300 030 919 or email [email protected].

Regards

Stakeholder and Community Engagement Team
Didn't they already do the kerbing along there a year ago

Sent from my SM-J730G using Tapatalk


Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 7:09 pm
by timtam20292
citywatcher wrote:
Fri Oct 05, 2018 5:57 pm
timtam20292 wrote:
Dear Stakeholder

Thank you for your interest in the City Tram Extension Project. We write to notify you of upcoming kerb works in front of Ayres House, on North Terrace, as part of the City Tram Extension.

Day and night works will commence on Sunday, 7 October 2018 and are expected to be completed within a week, weather permitting. There will be no works on Friday or Saturday (5-6 October).

Lane and speed restrictions will be in place in the vicinity of the works. Two lanes will be maintained for west bound traffic in front of Ayres House. A 40km/h speed restriction will be in place whilst works are undertaken. Signage and traffic management will advise motorists of changed conditions.

Access to businesses and properties will be maintained.

Thank you for your continued interest in the City Tram Extension Project. For more information on the City Tram Extension Project please visit www.citytramextension.sa.gov.au, call the enquiry line on 1300 030 919 or email [email protected].

Regards

Stakeholder and Community Engagement Team
Didn't they already do the kerbing along there a year ago

Sent from my SM-J730G using Tapatalk
🤷🏻‍♂️

Re: News & Discussion: Trams

Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2018 9:01 pm
by Llessur2002
FOI documents reveal the complexities right-hand tram turn could face

A RIGHT-hand tram turn onto North Tce from King William St requires a number of planning compromises to achieve a functional design because of the existing complexity of the intersection, Freedom of Information documents reveal.

The documents, from a request by Labor’s transport spokesman Tom Koutsantonis, outline just how complex the $37 million project — a Liberal pre-election promise — will be through hundreds of pages of DPTI correspondence and even a presentation from lead designer Aurecon.

They also reveal an engineering report into the proposed turn was completed on September 30 — prompting Mr Koutsantonis to call on Transport Minister Stephan Knoll to release the full advice.

The study by Aurecon’s investigated three “configuration options” to install a right-hand turn onto North Tce to serve the East End tram extension, which has missed numerous deadlines and still doesn’t have a start date.

They were, adding a right-hand turn to the existing track and road geometry, lowering the rail relative to the existing road level to achieve the appropriate geometry or elevating the rail.

In a presentation to DPTI, Aurecon says because of the mirroring of the existing left hand turn from North Tce to King William St, just adding another right-turn would encounter numerous challenges.

But the designer says even adding a second track will be difficult.

“The requirement to assess the viability of adding a second track to the North Terrace (East) to King William Street manoeuvre, connecting the southern and eastern legs adds a significant degree of complexity to what is already an extremely complex piece of rail geometry,” the documents say.

“The requirement to have intersecting sections of track be planar (on a flat surface) means that the addition of this second turning track will require a number of compromises to be made in order to achieve a functional design.”

Part of the complexities around the project include a potential retaining wall outside Parliament House.

Mr Knoll said the Government would consider the report.

“We always knew this would be a technically difficult project to deliver,” he said.

“That’s why we’ve commissioned this engineering report and once we’ve considered the report we’ll be in a better position to talk about how we’ll deliver the right hand turn.”

Mr Koutsantonis said Mr Knoll owed it to taxpayers to release the engineering report immediately, especially since it contained how much it would cost to dig up the King William St intersection.

“We now know that Minister Stephan Knoll has received an engineering report into the tram right-hand turn, including how much it will cost to dig up the intersection of King William and North Terrace and how engineers plan to address the significant issues associated with the project,” he said.

“The Minister must immediately release this report in full.

“After continually failing to deliver on the opening of the new tram extension, the least the Minister can do is release this report, tell us exactly how much a right-hand turn will cost taxpayers, and when he plans to deliver this Liberal election promise.”

Emails from DPTI also reveal that the department has told Aurecon that bus operations will not change if a right-hand turn is implemented.

The documents also reveal that the Adelaide City Council has proposed to modify the high entry left turn at the north eastern corner of the intersection.
From: https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/sou ... 628dbc5662