Page 26 of 76
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Tue Oct 24, 2017 10:35 pm
by Nathan
A little tidbit from page 32 of the Adelaide Contemporary design comp brief:
It is also proposed to retain the Eleanor Harrald building, which is not on the Register.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 12:35 am
by crawf
Nathan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 10:35 pm
A little tidbit from page 32 of the Adelaide Contemporary design comp brief:
It is also proposed to retain the Eleanor Harrald building, which is not on the Register.
Awesome!. I'd be very sadden to see that lovely building go.
Would make a perfect 'loft style' apartment complex.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 4:02 pm
by JAKJ
As much as I dislike utilising parklands for private development which isn't community orientated - if the buildings are already there and heritage, would love to see this building and its next door neighbor as a residential or hotel conversion. Superficially well suited for it and could help fund some of the public buildings works.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 7:56 pm
by ml69
crawf wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2017 12:35 am
Nathan wrote: ↑Tue Oct 24, 2017 10:35 pm
A little tidbit from page 32 of the Adelaide Contemporary design comp brief:
It is also proposed to retain the Eleanor Harrald building, which is not on the Register.
Awesome!. I'd be very sadden to see that lovely building go.
Would make a perfect 'loft style' apartment complex.
Totally agree ... it would make lovely loft apartments.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Wed Oct 25, 2017 8:25 pm
by wilkiebarkid
JAKJ wrote: ↑Wed Oct 25, 2017 4:02 pm
As much as I dislike utilising parklands for private development which isn't community orientated - if the buildings are already there and heritage, would love to see this building and its next door neighbor as a residential or hotel conversion. Superficially well suited for it and could help fund some of the public buildings works.
Bravo!
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 4:31 pm
by ChillyPhilly
The Australian Institute of Architects has refused to endorse the first stage of the competition to design the Adelaide Contemporary art gallery, InDaily can reveal.
https://indaily.com.au/news/2017/11/24/ ... tute-test/
[SWP] Re: [VIS] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 6:20 pm
by Waewick
I think we can conclude they are a bit FOS.
I know for a fact this has attracted big names both nationally and internationally.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2017 6:25 pm
by Mpol03
I cannot wait to see the results
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Sun Dec 10, 2017 1:44 pm
by timtam20292
Scaffolding has gone up on the East Wing.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2017 9:55 pm
by timtam20292
Demolition is now underway.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:01 am
by Matt
Unable to get past the paywall, but AdelaideNow suggests there's some action on the ORAH front.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:25 am
by Nathan
Labor promises $350 million to redevelop Old Royal Adelaide Hospital site
LABOR is vowing to spend $350 million over nine years on redeveloping the prime Old Royal Adelaide Hospital site, focusing on future industries including artificial intelligence, cyber security, renewable energy and film.
Premier Jay Weatherill will on Tuesday unveil Labor’s third plan for the site since the new RAH was announced in 2007.
But the decision on a linchpin of the 7ha site — a proposed $250 million contemporary art gallery adjacent the Adelaide Botanic Gardens — will not be announced during the election campaign because results of a design competition are set to be released in April.
Much of the $350 million is likely to be spent on demolition and decontamination costs, which in 2016 were put at up to $200 million by government agency Renewal SA, which will oversee the redevelopment.
But the funding also would go to ultra-fast broadband infrastructure, refurbishing heritage buildings for tech firms and partnering with the private sector on a new research and innovation building.
Under Labor’s plan, workspace at the site would be made available to start-up firms and businesses in future industries.
The plan includes significant elements of a $1 billion proposal by a consortium including developers Commercial & General and John Holland, which collapsed in September last year.
These elements include a five-star hotel, returning more than 2ha to the Botanic Gardens, a strong university and research presence and student and short-stay accommodation.
Labor has ruled out large-scale residential apartments, which had been considered critical to achieving a private sector return on the site.
Mr Weatherill said start-ups and companies in future industries such as space, cyber security and artificial intelligence would be able to work together, grow ideas and make South Australia a world leader.
“The Old Royal Adelaide Hospital site presents us with an enormous opportunity to bring together our educational institutions, government and the private sector to work together to grow the types of industries that will provide the jobs of the future,” Mr Weatherill said.
Labor hopes to snare the seat of Adelaide from the Liberals, who have yet to reveal their plans for the old RAH site.
Opposition Leader Steven Marshall last September opposed housing towers, saying the site should become a beacon for generating jobs and prosperity.
Adelaide University vice-chancellor Peter Rathjen welcomed the announcement of a “large-scale, visionary redevelopment” for the old RAH, where the university is developing an Institute for Machine Learning.
“The site has the potential to expand the number of high-quality manufacturing jobs and industries that will secure the future for generations of South Australians to come,” Professor Rathjen said.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 1:20 am
by Patrick_27
Nathan wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 12:25 am
Labor promises $350 million to redevelop Old Royal Adelaide Hospital site
LABOR is vowing to spend $350 million over nine years on redeveloping the prime Old Royal Adelaide Hospital site, focusing on future industries including artificial intelligence, cyber security, renewable energy and film.
Premier Jay Weatherill will on Tuesday unveil Labor’s third plan for the site since the new RAH was announced in 2007.
But the decision on a linchpin of the 7ha site — a proposed $250 million contemporary art gallery adjacent the Adelaide Botanic Gardens — will not be announced during the election campaign because results of a design competition are set to be released in April.
Much of the $350 million is likely to be spent on demolition and decontamination costs, which in 2016 were put at up to $200 million by government agency Renewal SA, which will oversee the redevelopment.
But the funding also would go to ultra-fast broadband infrastructure, refurbishing heritage buildings for tech firms and partnering with the private sector on a new research and innovation building.
Under Labor’s plan, workspace at the site would be made available to start-up firms and businesses in future industries.
The plan includes significant elements of a $1 billion proposal by a consortium including developers Commercial & General and John Holland, which collapsed in September last year.
These elements include a five-star hotel, returning more than 2ha to the Botanic Gardens, a strong university and research presence and student and short-stay accommodation.
Labor has ruled out large-scale residential apartments, which had been considered critical to achieving a private sector return on the site.
Mr Weatherill said start-ups and companies in future industries such as space, cyber security and artificial intelligence would be able to work together, grow ideas and make South Australia a world leader.
“The Old Royal Adelaide Hospital site presents us with an enormous opportunity to bring together our educational institutions, government and the private sector to work together to grow the types of industries that will provide the jobs of the future,” Mr Weatherill said.
Labor hopes to snare the seat of Adelaide from the Liberals, who have yet to reveal their plans for the old RAH site.
Opposition Leader Steven Marshall last September opposed housing towers, saying the site should become a beacon for generating jobs and prosperity.
Adelaide University vice-chancellor Peter Rathjen welcomed the announcement of a “large-scale, visionary redevelopment” for the old RAH, where the university is developing an Institute for Machine Learning.
“The site has the potential to expand the number of high-quality manufacturing jobs and industries that will secure the future for generations of South Australians to come,” Professor Rathjen said.
A far better outcome for the site IMO, however I still don't understand why there is the faded out inclusion of high-rise buildings on this site? For what is trying to be achieved here, there is surely enough heritage listed buildings to remain that can take the load of what Labor are proposing...
If anything WERE to be built on this site (excluding the pipe plans for an new modern art gallery), I feel something that would fit nicely into the new open space created from the demolished buildings and that would find consistent enough use/purpose would be an outdoor concert amphitheatre similar to the Sidney Myer Music Bowl. This could provide an extra revenue stream for the Botanic Gardens, host a bulk of the outdoor events that Botanic Park currently host, and provide a nice outdoor venue for the ASO all the while being out of the way enough to not cause a headache every time they need to fence off some of the area for such a use. And if it were of a 1,000-7,000 capacity, this would then slot nicely between Thebby/Festival Theatre and the AEC or a new area at Memorial Drive.
Just a thought, anyway.
I'm glad to see they've ditched the $70m underground concert hall idea, it was always going to cost more than $70m to build a concert hall from the ground up.
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 10:47 am
by monotonehell
Patrick_27 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 20, 2018 1:20 am
I'm glad to see they've ditched the $70m
underground concert hall idea, it was always going to cost more than $70m to build a concert hall from the ground up.
I think you mean "ground down".
[SWP] Re: Former RAH Site (Design Competition)
Posted: Tue Feb 20, 2018 11:00 am
by Nathan
I was on board with the underground concert hall. It would generate good evening activity to complement the mostly daytime activity from the gallery.